Pemphigus Vulgaris Scoring Systems: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sue-Ching Yeoh, Stephen Adelstein, Omar Kujan
{"title":"Pemphigus Vulgaris Scoring Systems: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sue-Ching Yeoh, Stephen Adelstein, Omar Kujan","doi":"10.1111/jop.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare autoimmune blistering condition characterised by mucocutaneous lesions secondary to acantholysis. Assessment of disease activity, severity, and treatment response is crucial for guiding management and research. Multiple clinical scoring systems have been developed for pemphigus vulgaris; however, consensus on their optimal use is lacking. This scoping review aims to identify, evaluate, and summarise the clinical scoring systems used in pemphigus vulgaris, focusing on validity, reliability, and application in clinical practice and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases (PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) as well as grey literature to identify studies describing clinical scoring systems for pemphigus vulgaris. Data on scoring system components, validity, clinical applicability, and limitations were extracted and synthesised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified several scoring systems, including the Pemphigus Disease Area Index, Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score, and other less commonly used tools. Scoring systems varied in design, with key differences noted in assessment domains, including mucosal versus cutaneous involvement, patient-reported outcomes, and usability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current clinical scoring systems for pemphigus vulgaris provide frameworks for disease assessment but exhibit variability in scope, validation, and practical implementation. Further development to incorporate emerging biomarkers and quality of life, as well as encompass all clinical subsites, will enhance their utility in guiding patient care and advancing research. This review highlights the need for consensus on a universal scoring system tailored to the multifaceted nature of pemphigus vulgaris.</p>","PeriodicalId":16588,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare autoimmune blistering condition characterised by mucocutaneous lesions secondary to acantholysis. Assessment of disease activity, severity, and treatment response is crucial for guiding management and research. Multiple clinical scoring systems have been developed for pemphigus vulgaris; however, consensus on their optimal use is lacking. This scoping review aims to identify, evaluate, and summarise the clinical scoring systems used in pemphigus vulgaris, focusing on validity, reliability, and application in clinical practice and research.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases (PubMed (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) as well as grey literature to identify studies describing clinical scoring systems for pemphigus vulgaris. Data on scoring system components, validity, clinical applicability, and limitations were extracted and synthesised.

Results: The review identified several scoring systems, including the Pemphigus Disease Area Index, Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score, and other less commonly used tools. Scoring systems varied in design, with key differences noted in assessment domains, including mucosal versus cutaneous involvement, patient-reported outcomes, and usability.

Conclusion: Current clinical scoring systems for pemphigus vulgaris provide frameworks for disease assessment but exhibit variability in scope, validation, and practical implementation. Further development to incorporate emerging biomarkers and quality of life, as well as encompass all clinical subsites, will enhance their utility in guiding patient care and advancing research. This review highlights the need for consensus on a universal scoring system tailored to the multifaceted nature of pemphigus vulgaris.

寻常性天疱疮评分系统:范围审查。
背景:寻常型天疱疮是一种罕见的自身免疫性水疱,其特征是继发于棘层松解的皮肤粘膜病变。评估疾病活动性、严重程度和治疗反应对指导管理和研究至关重要。多种临床评分系统已开发寻常型天疱疮;然而,对它们的最佳使用还缺乏共识。本综述旨在识别、评估和总结用于寻常型天疱疮的临床评分系统,重点关注有效性、可靠性及其在临床实践和研究中的应用。方法:通过电子数据库(PubMed (Medline)、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library)以及灰色文献进行全面的文献检索,以确定描述寻常型天疱疮临床评分系统的研究。提取和综合评分系统组成、有效性、临床适用性和局限性的数据。结果:本综述确定了几种评分系统,包括天疱疮疾病面积指数、自身免疫性大疱性皮肤疾病强度评分和其他不太常用的工具。评分系统在设计上各不相同,在评估领域存在关键差异,包括粘膜与皮肤受累、患者报告的结果和可用性。结论:目前的寻常型天疱疮临床评分系统为疾病评估提供了框架,但在范围、有效性和实际实施方面存在差异。进一步发展纳入新兴生物标志物和生活质量,以及涵盖所有临床亚位点,将增强其在指导患者护理和推进研究方面的效用。这篇综述强调需要共识的普遍评分系统量身定制寻常性天疱疮的多方面性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine is to publish manuscripts of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in oral pathology and oral medicine. Papers advancing the science or practice of these disciplines will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of techniques within the spheres of light and electron microscopy, tissue and organ culture, immunology, histochemistry and immunocytochemistry, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信