Myofunctional Therapy in Adults and Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Overview and Re-Analysis of Systematic Reviews.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eleonora Pisoni, Lorenza Buttafava, Stefania Guida, Greta Castellini, Silvia Bargeri, Silvia Gianola
{"title":"Myofunctional Therapy in Adults and Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Overview and Re-Analysis of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Eleonora Pisoni, Lorenza Buttafava, Stefania Guida, Greta Castellini, Silvia Bargeri, Silvia Gianola","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This overview with re-analysis of systematic reviews (SRs) aims to assess the effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy (MT) for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2024. SRs with meta-analyses on OSA in adults or children who underwent MT intervention compared to any control were included. Primary outcomes were severity of sleep apnea, oxygen saturation, sleep efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, while secondary outcomes included snoring intensity, frequency, and sleep quality. We included nine SRs, encompassing 21 unique primary studies (13 RCTs, 8 pre-post studies; n = 716 participants). The methodological quality of the SRs was generally critically low (5/9 SRs). After re-analyzing outcome data (primary studies overlap: 13.44%), MT seems to be more effective than control in reducing severity of sleep apnea (MD -9.54; CIs 95% -14.04, -5.04), daytime sleepiness (MD -3.62; CIs 95% -6.61, -0.63), sleep quality (MD -2.23; CIs 95% -2.93, -1.53), and in improving minimum oxygen saturation (MD 3.19; CIs 95% 1.47, 4.91) in adults. No differences were found in mean oxygen saturation and sleep efficiency. Meta-analyses comparing pre-MT to post-MT showed improvements post-MT. Sparse evidence was found for other outcomes and for children. MT may improve multiple clinical outcomes in OSA. Results should be interpreted cautiously, as most primary studies are at high risk of bias. More research is needed on the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70219"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This overview with re-analysis of systematic reviews (SRs) aims to assess the effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy (MT) for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2024. SRs with meta-analyses on OSA in adults or children who underwent MT intervention compared to any control were included. Primary outcomes were severity of sleep apnea, oxygen saturation, sleep efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, while secondary outcomes included snoring intensity, frequency, and sleep quality. We included nine SRs, encompassing 21 unique primary studies (13 RCTs, 8 pre-post studies; n = 716 participants). The methodological quality of the SRs was generally critically low (5/9 SRs). After re-analyzing outcome data (primary studies overlap: 13.44%), MT seems to be more effective than control in reducing severity of sleep apnea (MD -9.54; CIs 95% -14.04, -5.04), daytime sleepiness (MD -3.62; CIs 95% -6.61, -0.63), sleep quality (MD -2.23; CIs 95% -2.93, -1.53), and in improving minimum oxygen saturation (MD 3.19; CIs 95% 1.47, 4.91) in adults. No differences were found in mean oxygen saturation and sleep efficiency. Meta-analyses comparing pre-MT to post-MT showed improvements post-MT. Sparse evidence was found for other outcomes and for children. MT may improve multiple clinical outcomes in OSA. Results should be interpreted cautiously, as most primary studies are at high risk of bias. More research is needed on the pediatric population.

成人和儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的肌功能治疗:综述和系统综述的再分析。
本综述通过对系统综述(SRs)的再分析,旨在评估口面部肌功能治疗(MT)对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的有效性。我们检索了PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆,截止到2024年7月。与任何对照组相比,接受MT干预的成人或儿童的OSA荟萃分析纳入了SRs。主要结局是睡眠呼吸暂停的严重程度、血氧饱和度、睡眠效率和白天嗜睡,而次要结局包括打鼾的强度、频率和睡眠质量。我们纳入了9个SRs,包括21个独特的主要研究(13个随机对照试验,8个前后研究,n = 716名受试者)。SRs的方法学质量通常极低(5/9 SRs)。在重新分析结果数据后(主要研究重叠:13.44%),MT在降低成人睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度(MD -9.54; ci 95% -14.04, -5.04)、白天嗜睡(MD -3.62; ci 95% -6.61, -0.63)、睡眠质量(MD -2.23; ci 95% -2.93, -1.53)和改善最低血氧饱和度(MD 3.19; ci 95% 1.47, 4.91)方面似乎比对照组更有效。在平均血氧饱和度和睡眠效率方面没有发现差异。meta分析比较治疗前和治疗后显示治疗后的改善。其他结果和儿童的证据很少。MT可能改善OSA的多种临床结果。结果应谨慎解释,因为大多数初级研究有很高的偏倚风险。需要对儿科人群进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信