{"title":"Myofunctional Therapy in Adults and Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Overview and Re-Analysis of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Eleonora Pisoni, Lorenza Buttafava, Stefania Guida, Greta Castellini, Silvia Bargeri, Silvia Gianola","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This overview with re-analysis of systematic reviews (SRs) aims to assess the effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy (MT) for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2024. SRs with meta-analyses on OSA in adults or children who underwent MT intervention compared to any control were included. Primary outcomes were severity of sleep apnea, oxygen saturation, sleep efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, while secondary outcomes included snoring intensity, frequency, and sleep quality. We included nine SRs, encompassing 21 unique primary studies (13 RCTs, 8 pre-post studies; n = 716 participants). The methodological quality of the SRs was generally critically low (5/9 SRs). After re-analyzing outcome data (primary studies overlap: 13.44%), MT seems to be more effective than control in reducing severity of sleep apnea (MD -9.54; CIs 95% -14.04, -5.04), daytime sleepiness (MD -3.62; CIs 95% -6.61, -0.63), sleep quality (MD -2.23; CIs 95% -2.93, -1.53), and in improving minimum oxygen saturation (MD 3.19; CIs 95% 1.47, 4.91) in adults. No differences were found in mean oxygen saturation and sleep efficiency. Meta-analyses comparing pre-MT to post-MT showed improvements post-MT. Sparse evidence was found for other outcomes and for children. MT may improve multiple clinical outcomes in OSA. Results should be interpreted cautiously, as most primary studies are at high risk of bias. More research is needed on the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70219"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This overview with re-analysis of systematic reviews (SRs) aims to assess the effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy (MT) for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) patients. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2024. SRs with meta-analyses on OSA in adults or children who underwent MT intervention compared to any control were included. Primary outcomes were severity of sleep apnea, oxygen saturation, sleep efficiency, and daytime sleepiness, while secondary outcomes included snoring intensity, frequency, and sleep quality. We included nine SRs, encompassing 21 unique primary studies (13 RCTs, 8 pre-post studies; n = 716 participants). The methodological quality of the SRs was generally critically low (5/9 SRs). After re-analyzing outcome data (primary studies overlap: 13.44%), MT seems to be more effective than control in reducing severity of sleep apnea (MD -9.54; CIs 95% -14.04, -5.04), daytime sleepiness (MD -3.62; CIs 95% -6.61, -0.63), sleep quality (MD -2.23; CIs 95% -2.93, -1.53), and in improving minimum oxygen saturation (MD 3.19; CIs 95% 1.47, 4.91) in adults. No differences were found in mean oxygen saturation and sleep efficiency. Meta-analyses comparing pre-MT to post-MT showed improvements post-MT. Sparse evidence was found for other outcomes and for children. MT may improve multiple clinical outcomes in OSA. Results should be interpreted cautiously, as most primary studies are at high risk of bias. More research is needed on the pediatric population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.