Improving policy design and epidemic response using integrated models of economic choice and disease dynamics with behavioral feedback.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
PLoS Computational Biology Pub Date : 2025-10-03 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013549
Hongru Du, Matthew V Zahn, Sara L Loo, Tijs W Alleman, Shaun Truelove, Bryan Patenaude, Lauren M Gardner, Nicholas Papageorge, Alison L Hill
{"title":"Improving policy design and epidemic response using integrated models of economic choice and disease dynamics with behavioral feedback.","authors":"Hongru Du, Matthew V Zahn, Sara L Loo, Tijs W Alleman, Shaun Truelove, Bryan Patenaude, Lauren M Gardner, Nicholas Papageorge, Alison L Hill","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human behavior plays a crucial role in infectious disease transmission, yet traditional models often overlook or oversimplify this factor, limiting predictions of disease spread and the associated socioeconomic impacts. Here we introduce a feedback-informed epidemiological model that integrates human behavior with disease dynamics in a credible, tractable, and extendable manner. From economics, we incorporate a dynamic decision-making model where individuals assess the trade-off between disease risks and economic consequences, and then link this to a risk-stratified compartmental model of disease spread taken from epidemiology. In the unified framework, heterogeneous individuals make choices based on current and future payoffs, influencing their risk of infection and shaping population-level disease dynamics. As an example, we model disease-decision feedback during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the decision to participate in paid, in-person work was a major determinant of disease risk. Comparing the impacts of stylized policy options representing mandatory, incentivized/compensated, and voluntary work abstention, we find that accounting for disease-behavior feedback has a significant impact on the relative health and economic impacts of policies. Including two crucial dimensions of heterogeneity-health and economic vulnerability-the results highlight how inequities between risk groups can be exacerbated or alleviated by disease control measures. Importantly, we show that a policy of more stringent workplace testing can potentially slow virus spread and, surprisingly, increase labor supply since individuals otherwise inclined to remain at home to avoid infection perceive a safer workplace. In short, our framework permits the exploration of avenues whereby health and wealth need not always be at odds. This flexible and extendable modeling framework offers a powerful tool for understanding the interplay between human behavior and disease spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 10","pages":"e1013549"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human behavior plays a crucial role in infectious disease transmission, yet traditional models often overlook or oversimplify this factor, limiting predictions of disease spread and the associated socioeconomic impacts. Here we introduce a feedback-informed epidemiological model that integrates human behavior with disease dynamics in a credible, tractable, and extendable manner. From economics, we incorporate a dynamic decision-making model where individuals assess the trade-off between disease risks and economic consequences, and then link this to a risk-stratified compartmental model of disease spread taken from epidemiology. In the unified framework, heterogeneous individuals make choices based on current and future payoffs, influencing their risk of infection and shaping population-level disease dynamics. As an example, we model disease-decision feedback during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the decision to participate in paid, in-person work was a major determinant of disease risk. Comparing the impacts of stylized policy options representing mandatory, incentivized/compensated, and voluntary work abstention, we find that accounting for disease-behavior feedback has a significant impact on the relative health and economic impacts of policies. Including two crucial dimensions of heterogeneity-health and economic vulnerability-the results highlight how inequities between risk groups can be exacerbated or alleviated by disease control measures. Importantly, we show that a policy of more stringent workplace testing can potentially slow virus spread and, surprisingly, increase labor supply since individuals otherwise inclined to remain at home to avoid infection perceive a safer workplace. In short, our framework permits the exploration of avenues whereby health and wealth need not always be at odds. This flexible and extendable modeling framework offers a powerful tool for understanding the interplay between human behavior and disease spread.

利用经济选择和带有行为反馈的疾病动力学的综合模型改进政策设计和流行病应对。
人类行为在传染病传播中起着至关重要的作用,但传统模型往往忽视或过度简化了这一因素,限制了对疾病传播和相关社会经济影响的预测。在这里,我们介绍了一个反馈信息的流行病学模型,该模型以可信、可处理和可扩展的方式将人类行为与疾病动态相结合。从经济学角度,我们结合了一个动态决策模型,其中个人评估疾病风险和经济后果之间的权衡,然后将其与来自流行病学的疾病传播的风险分层区隔模型联系起来。在统一的框架中,异质个体根据当前和未来的回报做出选择,影响他们的感染风险并形成人口水平的疾病动态。作为一个例子,我们在COVID-19大流行的最初几个月对疾病决策反馈进行了建模,当时参加有报酬的面对面工作的决定是疾病风险的主要决定因素。通过比较强制性、激励性/补偿性和自愿性放弃工作的风格化政策选择的影响,我们发现,考虑疾病-行为反馈对政策的相对健康和经济影响具有显著影响。包括异质性的两个关键维度——健康和经济脆弱性——结果强调了疾病控制措施如何加剧或减轻风险群体之间的不平等。重要的是,我们表明,更严格的工作场所检测政策可能会减缓病毒的传播,并且令人惊讶的是,增加劳动力供应,因为那些倾向于留在家里避免感染的人认为工作场所更安全。简而言之,我们的框架允许探索健康和财富不必总是相冲突的途径。这种灵活且可扩展的建模框架为理解人类行为与疾病传播之间的相互作用提供了强大的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Computational Biology
PLoS Computational Biology BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.70%
发文量
820
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery. Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines. Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights. Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology. Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信