Proton therapy may reduce the risk of cancer progression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a propensity score-matched analysis of intensity-modulated proton versus photon radiotherapy.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cong Bo, Zhenhuan Lv, Hong Zhang, Xianmin Hou, Yinxin Wang, Jing Liu, Xue Meng
{"title":"Proton therapy may reduce the risk of cancer progression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a propensity score-matched analysis of intensity-modulated proton versus photon radiotherapy.","authors":"Cong Bo, Zhenhuan Lv, Hong Zhang, Xianmin Hou, Yinxin Wang, Jing Liu, Xue Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) may preserve the immune response more effectively than intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) owing to its dosimetric advantages, making it a potentially superior modality in immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of IMPT versus IMRT during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the data of 466 patients (IMPT group, n=109; IMRT group, n=357) who received radiotherapy (RT) during ICI therapy between July 2022 and September 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was the duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and post-RT adverse events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to calculate survival curves and identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold used to dichotomize post-RT lymphocyte count was 0.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced after PSM. The IMPT group showed significantly longer median DoR (17.7 vs. 5.7 months, p=0.0001) and PFS (18.8 vs. 6.8 months, p<0.0001) than the IMRT group. Multivariable regression revealed IMPT to be an independent predictor of improved DoR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.55; p<0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.52; p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit of IMPT over IMRT in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, lung cancer, advanced-stage disease, or those receiving palliative, thoracic, or abdominal/pelvic RT. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts in the IMPT group showed potential correlation with improved DoR and PFS. Additionally, the IMPT group had fewer grade ≥2 post-RT adverse events (p=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMPT is linked to enhanced efficacy of ICIs, compared to IMRT, by improving DoR and PFS with tolerable adverse effects. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts may be associated with improved survival in patients receiving IMPT during ICI therapy. These findings suggest that IMPT may be a preferable option for preserving immune function, thereby optimizing outcomes during immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) may preserve the immune response more effectively than intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) owing to its dosimetric advantages, making it a potentially superior modality in immunotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of IMPT versus IMRT during immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment.

Methods and materials: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 466 patients (IMPT group, n=109; IMRT group, n=357) who received radiotherapy (RT) during ICI therapy between July 2022 and September 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was the duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and post-RT adverse events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to calculate survival curves and identify independent prognostic factors. The threshold used to dichotomize post-RT lymphocyte count was 0.5 × 109/L.

Results: Baseline clinical characteristics were balanced after PSM. The IMPT group showed significantly longer median DoR (17.7 vs. 5.7 months, p=0.0001) and PFS (18.8 vs. 6.8 months, p<0.0001) than the IMRT group. Multivariable regression revealed IMPT to be an independent predictor of improved DoR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.55; p<0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.36; 95% CI: 0.25-0.52; p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses suggested greater benefit of IMPT over IMRT in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, lung cancer, advanced-stage disease, or those receiving palliative, thoracic, or abdominal/pelvic RT. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts in the IMPT group showed potential correlation with improved DoR and PFS. Additionally, the IMPT group had fewer grade ≥2 post-RT adverse events (p=0.012).

Conclusions: IMPT is linked to enhanced efficacy of ICIs, compared to IMRT, by improving DoR and PFS with tolerable adverse effects. Higher post-RT lymphocyte counts may be associated with improved survival in patients receiving IMPT during ICI therapy. These findings suggest that IMPT may be a preferable option for preserving immune function, thereby optimizing outcomes during immunotherapy.

质子治疗可以降低免疫检查点抑制剂治疗期间癌症进展的风险:强度调制质子与光子放疗的倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:调强质子放射治疗(IMPT)由于其剂量学上的优势,可能比调强光子放射治疗(IMRT)更有效地保持免疫应答,使其成为一种潜在的优越的免疫治疗方式。本研究旨在评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗期间IMPT与IMRT的临床益处。方法与材料:回顾性分析2022年7月至2024年9月期间在ICI治疗期间接受放疗(RT)的466例患者(IMPT组,n=109; IMRT组,n=357)的资料。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于平衡临床特征。主要终点是反应持续时间(DoR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和放疗后不良事件。Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险回归用于计算生存曲线和确定独立预后因素。rt后淋巴细胞计数二分类阈值为0.5 × 109/L。结果:PSM后基线临床特征平衡。IMPT组显着延长了中位DoR(17.7个月vs 5.7个月,p=0.0001)和PFS(18.8个月vs 6.8个月)。结论:与IMRT相比,IMPT通过改善DoR和PFS以及可容忍的不良反应来增强ICIs的疗效。在ICI治疗期间接受IMPT的患者,较高的rt后淋巴细胞计数可能与生存率提高有关。这些发现表明IMPT可能是保存免疫功能的更好选择,从而优化免疫治疗期间的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信