Anticipation of pain during operant learning increases cognitive performance and feedback-related cortical potentials.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Carolina Ceruti, Laura Petrini, Giulia Erica Aliotta, Dennis Boye Larsen, Elia Valentini, Kristian Hennings, Carina Graversen, Carsten Dahl Mørch
{"title":"Anticipation of pain during operant learning increases cognitive performance and feedback-related cortical potentials.","authors":"Carolina Ceruti, Laura Petrini, Giulia Erica Aliotta, Dennis Boye Larsen, Elia Valentini, Kristian Hennings, Carina Graversen, Carsten Dahl Mørch","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07167-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Operant conditioning (OC) evokes behavioral changes and may be useful in pain management. However, it is unknown how alteration of a tonic painful stimulus may affect cognitive performance in an OC learning task and the associated neural activity. To address this, specific event-related potentials (ERPs) and cognitive performance were assessed after an OC task, using altered pain intensity as the operant stimulus. Two OC paradigms were designed using painful tonic pressure pain as the conditioning stimulus. 29 healthy participants received individually set tonic pressure pain corresponding to visual analogue scale 5 (VAS5; pain threshold). Pressure was maintained and a cognitive task performance yielded reward or punishment. Consequences of correct and incorrect answers in the negative reinforcement (NR) condition were pain relief (VAS3) or no pressure change (VAS5), respectively, and no pressure change (VAS5) or increased pressure (VAS7) in the positive punishment (PP) condition, respectively. The initial condition (NR or PP) was randomized, and 120 trials were conducted in three same-day sessions. 64-channel electroencephalography was recorded, and auditory-feedback ERPs (P1N1, P2N2, P3N3) were extracted. Higher ERP peak-to-peak amplitudes were found when participants received feedback that their answer was incorrect. A small OC learning behavior effect was found across trials with no difference between NR and PP. Independent of OC paradigm, learning behavior was induced, and ERP complex amplitudes increased when incorrect answers were given. These novel findings show that higher pain expectancy due to an incorrect answer, facilitated feedback-related ERPs when using pain as a conditioning stimulus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 11","pages":"221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07167-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Operant conditioning (OC) evokes behavioral changes and may be useful in pain management. However, it is unknown how alteration of a tonic painful stimulus may affect cognitive performance in an OC learning task and the associated neural activity. To address this, specific event-related potentials (ERPs) and cognitive performance were assessed after an OC task, using altered pain intensity as the operant stimulus. Two OC paradigms were designed using painful tonic pressure pain as the conditioning stimulus. 29 healthy participants received individually set tonic pressure pain corresponding to visual analogue scale 5 (VAS5; pain threshold). Pressure was maintained and a cognitive task performance yielded reward or punishment. Consequences of correct and incorrect answers in the negative reinforcement (NR) condition were pain relief (VAS3) or no pressure change (VAS5), respectively, and no pressure change (VAS5) or increased pressure (VAS7) in the positive punishment (PP) condition, respectively. The initial condition (NR or PP) was randomized, and 120 trials were conducted in three same-day sessions. 64-channel electroencephalography was recorded, and auditory-feedback ERPs (P1N1, P2N2, P3N3) were extracted. Higher ERP peak-to-peak amplitudes were found when participants received feedback that their answer was incorrect. A small OC learning behavior effect was found across trials with no difference between NR and PP. Independent of OC paradigm, learning behavior was induced, and ERP complex amplitudes increased when incorrect answers were given. These novel findings show that higher pain expectancy due to an incorrect answer, facilitated feedback-related ERPs when using pain as a conditioning stimulus.

在操作性学习过程中,对疼痛的预期会增加认知表现和反馈相关的皮质电位。
操作性条件反射(OC)引起行为改变,可能在疼痛管理中有用。然而,目前尚不清楚强直性疼痛刺激的改变如何影响OC学习任务中的认知表现和相关的神经活动。为了解决这个问题,使用改变的疼痛强度作为操作刺激,在OC任务后评估特定事件相关电位(erp)和认知表现。设计了以疼痛性紧张性疼痛作为条件反射刺激的两个OC范式。29名健康参与者分别接受与视觉模拟量表5 (VAS5;疼痛阈值)相对应的紧张性压力疼痛。压力被维持,认知任务的表现产生奖励或惩罚。负强化(NR)条件下正确答案和错误答案的结果分别为疼痛缓解(VAS3)或无压力变化(VAS5),积极惩罚(PP)条件下压力无变化(VAS5)或压力增加(VAS7)。初始条件(NR或PP)是随机的,120个试验在同一天的三个疗程中进行。记录64通道脑电图,提取听觉反馈erp (P1N1、P2N2、P3N3)。当参与者收到他们的答案不正确的反馈时,发现更高的ERP峰对峰振幅。在不同的实验中,不同的认知模式对学习行为有较小的影响,但NR和PP之间没有差异。在认知模式之外,学习行为被诱导,当给出错误答案时,ERP复波幅度增加。这些新发现表明,当将疼痛作为条件反射刺激时,错误答案导致的更高的疼痛预期促进了与反馈相关的erp。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信