{"title":"EXPRESS: Nucleated red blood cells in critically ill cats.","authors":"René Dörfelt, Kerstin Pabst, Katrin Hartmann","doi":"10.1177/1098612X251387446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study investigates the presence of NRBCs in the circulation as a prognostic factor in critically ill cats.MethodsCritically ill cats were prospectively included over 11 months if they fulfilled at least 3/4 SIRS criteria or if their general condition was severely reduced. All cats underwent a physical examination and blood collection for haematological and clinical chemical parameters, including NRBCs at admission and during hospitalisation. Outcome was defined as survival to 28 days after discharge from the hospital. For manual microscopic NRBCs count, 300 nucleated cells were examined and recorded as relative NRBC count (rNRBC). Absolute NRBC (aNRBC) numbers were calculated from those values: aNRBC = rNRBC × (WBC/100).ResultsNRBCs, and most commonly metarubricytes, were detected in 25/94 critically ill cats.Underlying diseases were infectious (10), neoplastic (33), metabolic (29), cardiovascular (10), neurologic (5) and miscellaneous (7). A positive correlation of absolute NRBCs with corrected white blood cells (r = 0.448) was observed. After 28 days, 18 cats were alive and 76 cats did not survive. Mortality did not differ between NRBC-positive and NRBC-negative cats (p = 0.641). Absolute NRBC count was 0.382 G/l (0.032-28.990 G/l) and was not different between survivors and non-survivors. Anaemia was not associated with NRBCs. All but one of 6 on day 2 NRBC positive cats did not survive.Conclusion and relevanceNRBCs can be observed in the blood of critically ill cats but their occurrence did not have a prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1098612X251387446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X251387446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study investigates the presence of NRBCs in the circulation as a prognostic factor in critically ill cats.MethodsCritically ill cats were prospectively included over 11 months if they fulfilled at least 3/4 SIRS criteria or if their general condition was severely reduced. All cats underwent a physical examination and blood collection for haematological and clinical chemical parameters, including NRBCs at admission and during hospitalisation. Outcome was defined as survival to 28 days after discharge from the hospital. For manual microscopic NRBCs count, 300 nucleated cells were examined and recorded as relative NRBC count (rNRBC). Absolute NRBC (aNRBC) numbers were calculated from those values: aNRBC = rNRBC × (WBC/100).ResultsNRBCs, and most commonly metarubricytes, were detected in 25/94 critically ill cats.Underlying diseases were infectious (10), neoplastic (33), metabolic (29), cardiovascular (10), neurologic (5) and miscellaneous (7). A positive correlation of absolute NRBCs with corrected white blood cells (r = 0.448) was observed. After 28 days, 18 cats were alive and 76 cats did not survive. Mortality did not differ between NRBC-positive and NRBC-negative cats (p = 0.641). Absolute NRBC count was 0.382 G/l (0.032-28.990 G/l) and was not different between survivors and non-survivors. Anaemia was not associated with NRBCs. All but one of 6 on day 2 NRBC positive cats did not survive.Conclusion and relevanceNRBCs can be observed in the blood of critically ill cats but their occurrence did not have a prognostic value.
期刊介绍:
JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.