Deep-sea mining risks for sharks, rays, and chimaeras.

IF 7.5 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Aaron B Judah, Christopher G Mull, Nicholas K Dulvy, Brittany Finucci, Victoria E Assad, Jeffrey C Drazen
{"title":"Deep-sea mining risks for sharks, rays, and chimaeras.","authors":"Aaron B Judah, Christopher G Mull, Nicholas K Dulvy, Brittany Finucci, Victoria E Assad, Jeffrey C Drazen","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep-sea mining is expected to cause disturbances of sufficient scale and intensity to pose a risk to biodiversity and ecosystem function.<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup> We assess the potential impact of deep-sea mining on sharks, rays, and chimaeras in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ) and identify 30 species (of the total 1,223 marine chondrichthyan species) that overlap spatially with the anticipated mining footprint, specifically through 2 pathways: benthic impacts from physical disturbance and the collector vehicle plume<sup>2</sup> and midwater impacts from the discharge plume.<sup>4</sup> Most species' depth ranges (83%, 25/30, range: 3%-80%) overlapped vertically with the benthic mining footprint, while all species overlapped with discharge plume scenarios. Further, 17 of these species had >50% depth overlap with benthic impacts of at least one of the mineral types. Seven species were egg-laying, benthic, or benthopelagic, which increases their susceptibility to seabed impacts. Filter-feeding species also had high depth overlap with potential midwater discharge plumes. Nearly two-thirds (60%, 18/30) are already threatened with an elevated risk of extinction, and 64.3% are predicted to be threatened. Our analysis raises concerns that deep-sea mining would compound and worsen their extinction risk. We recommend updated risk assessments of significant adverse impacts to chondrichthyans; robust baseline monitoring prior to, during, and after mining; spatial protections near crust and sulfide mining; and that the discharge plume be set at a minimum depth below 2,000 m or at the seabed to minimize overlap with midwater species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11359,"journal":{"name":"Current Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2025.09.019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep-sea mining is expected to cause disturbances of sufficient scale and intensity to pose a risk to biodiversity and ecosystem function.1,2,3 We assess the potential impact of deep-sea mining on sharks, rays, and chimaeras in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ) and identify 30 species (of the total 1,223 marine chondrichthyan species) that overlap spatially with the anticipated mining footprint, specifically through 2 pathways: benthic impacts from physical disturbance and the collector vehicle plume2 and midwater impacts from the discharge plume.4 Most species' depth ranges (83%, 25/30, range: 3%-80%) overlapped vertically with the benthic mining footprint, while all species overlapped with discharge plume scenarios. Further, 17 of these species had >50% depth overlap with benthic impacts of at least one of the mineral types. Seven species were egg-laying, benthic, or benthopelagic, which increases their susceptibility to seabed impacts. Filter-feeding species also had high depth overlap with potential midwater discharge plumes. Nearly two-thirds (60%, 18/30) are already threatened with an elevated risk of extinction, and 64.3% are predicted to be threatened. Our analysis raises concerns that deep-sea mining would compound and worsen their extinction risk. We recommend updated risk assessments of significant adverse impacts to chondrichthyans; robust baseline monitoring prior to, during, and after mining; spatial protections near crust and sulfide mining; and that the discharge plume be set at a minimum depth below 2,000 m or at the seabed to minimize overlap with midwater species.

深海采矿对鲨鱼、鳐鱼和嵌合体的风险。
深海采矿预计会造成足够规模和强度的干扰,对生物多样性和生态系统功能构成威胁我们评估了深海采矿对国家管辖范围以外地区(ABNJ)鲨鱼、鳐鱼和奇合体的潜在影响,并确定了30种(总计1,223种海洋软骨鱼类)与预期采矿足迹在空间上重叠,特别是通过两种途径:物理干扰对底栖生物的影响、收集器羽流2和排放羽流对中水的影响大多数物种的深度范围(83%,25/30,范围:3%-80%)与底栖生物采矿足迹垂直重叠,而所有物种都与排放羽情景重叠。此外,这些物种中有17种与至少一种矿物类型的底栖生物影响有50%的深度重叠。其中7种为产卵、底栖或底栖动物,这增加了它们对海底影响的敏感性。滤食性物种也与潜在的中水排放羽流有高度重叠。近三分之二(60%,18/30)的物种已经面临灭绝风险上升的威胁,预计64.3%的物种将受到威胁。我们的分析引起了人们的担忧,即深海采矿会加剧它们灭绝的风险。我们建议更新对软骨鱼的重大不利影响的风险评估;在采矿之前、期间和之后进行稳健的基线监测;近地壳与硫化物开采的空间保护排放烟羽的最小深度应设在2000米以下或海底,以尽量减少与水中物种的重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Biology
Current Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
869
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Biology is a comprehensive journal that showcases original research in various disciplines of biology. It provides a platform for scientists to disseminate their groundbreaking findings and promotes interdisciplinary communication. The journal publishes articles of general interest, encompassing diverse fields of biology. Moreover, it offers accessible editorial pieces that are specifically designed to enlighten non-specialist readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信