Deep learning approach for classifying grazing behavior in yearling horses using triaxial accelerometer data: A pilot study

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Uta Kamiya , Kasumi Kakiuchi , Kensuke Kawamura , Koichiro Ueda , Masahito Kawai , Akira Matsui , Natsuko Negishi
{"title":"Deep learning approach for classifying grazing behavior in yearling horses using triaxial accelerometer data: A pilot study","authors":"Uta Kamiya ,&nbsp;Kasumi Kakiuchi ,&nbsp;Kensuke Kawamura ,&nbsp;Koichiro Ueda ,&nbsp;Masahito Kawai ,&nbsp;Akira Matsui ,&nbsp;Natsuko Negishi","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accurate monitoring of grazing behavior in horses is essential for pasture management and welfare evaluation; however, conventional observation methods are labor-intensive and lack temporal resolution.</div></div><div><h3>Aims/objectives</h3><div>This pilot study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model using jaw-mounted accelerometer data to classify grazing and non-grazing behaviors in yearling horses under various pasture conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Four yearling Thoroughbred horses were equipped with triaxle accelerometers mounted under their jaws. Data were recorded at 10 Hz (100 ms) during a 19 h free-grazing period in a 4.0 ha paddock. A total of 230,286 data points were annotated as grazing (G) or non-grazing (NG) using synchronized video observation. Three deep learning models—one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and combined CNN+LSTM—were trained and evaluated under varying sampling rates (100–10,000 ms) and time windows (5–60 s). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and area under the curve (AUC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CNN+LSTM model demonstrated the highest classification performance with a test accuracy of 98.0 % and an AUC of 1.00. F1 scores were 0.99 for G and 0.97 for NG behavior. Across the full observational period, the proportion of grazing behavior was 58.3 % (±2.1 %). Spatial analysis revealed that grazing was concentrated along paddock peripheries, whereas non-grazing was more frequent in central zones.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A deep learning framework that combines CNN and LSTM can accurately classify grazing behavior in horses using jaw-mounted accelerometers. This non-invasive, high-resolution method offers a promising tool for automated behavioral monitoring in pasture-based systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 105706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080625003648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate monitoring of grazing behavior in horses is essential for pasture management and welfare evaluation; however, conventional observation methods are labor-intensive and lack temporal resolution.

Aims/objectives

This pilot study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model using jaw-mounted accelerometer data to classify grazing and non-grazing behaviors in yearling horses under various pasture conditions.

Methods

Four yearling Thoroughbred horses were equipped with triaxle accelerometers mounted under their jaws. Data were recorded at 10 Hz (100 ms) during a 19 h free-grazing period in a 4.0 ha paddock. A total of 230,286 data points were annotated as grazing (G) or non-grazing (NG) using synchronized video observation. Three deep learning models—one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and combined CNN+LSTM—were trained and evaluated under varying sampling rates (100–10,000 ms) and time windows (5–60 s). Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

The CNN+LSTM model demonstrated the highest classification performance with a test accuracy of 98.0 % and an AUC of 1.00. F1 scores were 0.99 for G and 0.97 for NG behavior. Across the full observational period, the proportion of grazing behavior was 58.3 % (±2.1 %). Spatial analysis revealed that grazing was concentrated along paddock peripheries, whereas non-grazing was more frequent in central zones.

Conclusion

A deep learning framework that combines CNN and LSTM can accurately classify grazing behavior in horses using jaw-mounted accelerometers. This non-invasive, high-resolution method offers a promising tool for automated behavioral monitoring in pasture-based systems.
利用三轴加速度计数据对一岁马放牧行为进行分类的深度学习方法:一项试点研究。
背景:准确监测马的放牧行为对牧场管理和福利评估至关重要;然而,传统的观测方法是劳动密集型的,而且缺乏时间分辨率。目的:本研究旨在开发并验证一种深度学习模型,该模型利用下颌加速度计数据对不同牧场条件下一岁马的放牧和非放牧行为进行分类。方法:在4匹一岁纯种马的下颌下安装三轴加速度计。在一个4.0公顷的围场中,在19小时的自由放牧期间,以10 Hz (100 ms)的频率记录数据。利用同步视频观测,共将230,286个数据点标注为放牧(G)或非放牧(NG)。在不同采样率(100-10,000 ms)和时间窗(5-60 s)下,对一维卷积神经网络(CNN)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和CNN+LSTM三种深度学习模型进行了训练和评估。使用准确性、F1评分、精度、召回率和曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型性能。结果:CNN+LSTM模型的分类性能最高,测试准确率为98.0%,AUC为1.00。G和NG行为的F1得分分别为0.99和0.97。在整个观测期内,放牧行为的比例为58.3%(±2.1%)。空间分析表明,放牧活动主要集中在围场外围,而非放牧活动在中心地带更为频繁。结论:结合CNN和LSTM的深度学习框架可以使用下颌加速度计准确分类马的放牧行为。这种非侵入性、高分辨率的方法为牧场系统的自动行为监测提供了一种很有前途的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信