Anterior vitrectomy incidence in cataract surgery among experienced surgeons and residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Salem Abu Al-Burak, Fahad Butt, Xiaole Li, Amit X Garg, Cindy Ml Hutnik, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta
{"title":"Anterior vitrectomy incidence in cataract surgery among experienced surgeons and residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Salem Abu Al-Burak, Fahad Butt, Xiaole Li, Amit X Garg, Cindy Ml Hutnik, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta","doi":"10.1177/11206721251380886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeCataract surgery is a fundamental procedure in ophthalmology, yet intraoperative complications such as anterior vitrectomy can compromise surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42025637001) aim to compare the incidence of anterior vitrectomy in cataract surgeries performed by ophthalmology residents versus experienced surgeons and assess factors contributing to surgical complications.MethodsA systematic search was conducted across EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, PQDT Global, ARVO and AAO for studies published after 2000 that reported on anterior vitrectomy incidence in cataract surgery. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA v. 18.0.ResultsOut of 1,190 screened studies, five studies (four retrospective cohort, one prospective cohort) involving phacoemulsification, extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) were included, encompassing a total of 4,918 cataract surgeries, and 208 anterior vitrectomy (AV) cases. The random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a significant AV incidence for residents (ES = 0.04, 95% CI: [0.01, 0.06]), while the incidence for experienced surgeons was not statistically significant (ES = 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.03, 0.09]). High heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I² = 92.1% for residents and I² = 96.7% for surgeons).ConclusionResidents may have a higher incidence of AV, highlighting the potential benefits of structured surgical training, early exposure, and mentorship in reducing intraoperative complications. Future research should explore simulation-based training and technology-assisted surgery to improve resident proficiency and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"11206721251380886"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251380886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeCataract surgery is a fundamental procedure in ophthalmology, yet intraoperative complications such as anterior vitrectomy can compromise surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42025637001) aim to compare the incidence of anterior vitrectomy in cataract surgeries performed by ophthalmology residents versus experienced surgeons and assess factors contributing to surgical complications.MethodsA systematic search was conducted across EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, PQDT Global, ARVO and AAO for studies published after 2000 that reported on anterior vitrectomy incidence in cataract surgery. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA v. 18.0.ResultsOut of 1,190 screened studies, five studies (four retrospective cohort, one prospective cohort) involving phacoemulsification, extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) were included, encompassing a total of 4,918 cataract surgeries, and 208 anterior vitrectomy (AV) cases. The random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a significant AV incidence for residents (ES = 0.04, 95% CI: [0.01, 0.06]), while the incidence for experienced surgeons was not statistically significant (ES = 0.03, 95% CI: [-0.03, 0.09]). High heterogeneity was observed among the included studies (I² = 92.1% for residents and I² = 96.7% for surgeons).ConclusionResidents may have a higher incidence of AV, highlighting the potential benefits of structured surgical training, early exposure, and mentorship in reducing intraoperative complications. Future research should explore simulation-based training and technology-assisted surgery to improve resident proficiency and patient outcomes.

在经验丰富的外科医生和住院医师中,白内障手术中前路玻璃体切除术的发生率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
摘要白内障手术是眼科的一项基本手术,但术中并发症如前眼玻璃体切除术会影响手术效果。本系统综述和荟萃分析(CRD42025637001)旨在比较眼科住院医师和经验丰富的外科医生在白内障手术中进行前路玻璃体切除术的发生率,并评估导致手术并发症的因素。方法系统检索EMBASE、MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov、PQDT Global、ARVO和AAO等网站2000年以后发表的有关白内障手术中前体切除术发生率的研究。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验和观察性研究。meta分析采用STATA v. 18.0进行。结果在筛选的1190项研究中,纳入了5项研究(4项回顾性队列研究,1项前瞻性队列研究),涉及超声乳化术、白内障囊外摘除术(ECCE)和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS),共计4918例白内障手术和208例前路玻璃体切除术(AV)。随机效应荟萃分析显示,住院医师的AV发生率显著(ES = 0.04, 95% CI:[0.01, 0.06]),而经验丰富的外科医生的AV发生率无统计学意义(ES = 0.03, 95% CI:[-0.03, 0.09])。在纳入的研究中观察到高度异质性(住院医师I²= 92.1%,外科医生I²= 96.7%)。结论住院医师可能有较高的房颤发生率,强调有组织的手术培训、早期暴露和指导在减少术中并发症方面的潜在益处。未来的研究应探索基于模拟的培训和技术辅助手术,以提高住院医生的熟练程度和患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信