Effect of magnetic auricular acupuncture on pain during ophthalmic examination of the newborn: a multicenter, triple-blinded, randomized controlled study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Long Li, Roukeyan Tuerxun, Yajie Su, Yanli Yao, Chuanzhong Yang, Hongyun Wang, Lili Wang, Hui Wu, Yanxiang Chen, Xiuxiang Liu, Hong Jiang, Hongxia Gao, Dong Li, Fang Wu, Yuan Shi, Xiaoying Li, Huiqing Sun, Yanchen Wang, Laishuan Wang, Shoo K Lee
{"title":"Effect of magnetic auricular acupuncture on pain during ophthalmic examination of the newborn: a multicenter, triple-blinded, randomized controlled study.","authors":"Long Li, Roukeyan Tuerxun, Yajie Su, Yanli Yao, Chuanzhong Yang, Hongyun Wang, Lili Wang, Hui Wu, Yanxiang Chen, Xiuxiang Liu, Hong Jiang, Hongxia Gao, Dong Li, Fang Wu, Yuan Shi, Xiaoying Li, Huiqing Sun, Yanchen Wang, Laishuan Wang, Shoo K Lee","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-06126-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Newborn eye examination is a painful procedure. Untreated pain experiences in infants have both short-term and long-term consequences, and pain control is essential. Unfortunately, non-pharmacological pain strategies are usually ineffective for complex and protracted procedures, whereas many pharmacologic agents have adverse effects. Magnetic auricular acupuncture (MAA) is a new method of pain relief that is potentially safe and effective. The objective of this study was to conduct a large definitive triple blinded randomized controlled trial of MAA for reducing pain in neonates undergoing ophthalmic examination. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID number ChiCTR1900027474) on November 14, 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at 16 tertiary hospitals in the People's Republic of China. Infants were eligible for participation if they were born at 26 to 42 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to participating NICUs during the study enrollment period, and scheduled to receive an eye examination for the first time at <44 weeks' corrected GA. Written informed consent was obtained from parents. Infants who were critically ill, dying or receiving sedatives were excluded. Infants randomized to the intervention (MAA) group received magnetic stickers applied prior to the ophthalmic procedure. Control group infants received placebo stickers with the magnets removed. We compared the primary outcome of Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score during the procedure between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 408 patients were randomized, but 14 patients in each of the placebo and intervention groups did not receive ophthalmic examination; leaving 190 patients in control group and 190 in intervention group. Infant characteristics were similar in the two groups, mean PIPP scores during eye exam were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (median (IQR): 10.00 (5.00,13.00) v 12.00 (7.00,14.00), p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MAA may offer an alternative or adjunct to current non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions to alleviate neonatal pain. Future studies should assess combinations of pain interventions and long term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-06126-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Newborn eye examination is a painful procedure. Untreated pain experiences in infants have both short-term and long-term consequences, and pain control is essential. Unfortunately, non-pharmacological pain strategies are usually ineffective for complex and protracted procedures, whereas many pharmacologic agents have adverse effects. Magnetic auricular acupuncture (MAA) is a new method of pain relief that is potentially safe and effective. The objective of this study was to conduct a large definitive triple blinded randomized controlled trial of MAA for reducing pain in neonates undergoing ophthalmic examination. The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID number ChiCTR1900027474) on November 14, 2019.

Methods: This was a multi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at 16 tertiary hospitals in the People's Republic of China. Infants were eligible for participation if they were born at 26 to 42 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to participating NICUs during the study enrollment period, and scheduled to receive an eye examination for the first time at <44 weeks' corrected GA. Written informed consent was obtained from parents. Infants who were critically ill, dying or receiving sedatives were excluded. Infants randomized to the intervention (MAA) group received magnetic stickers applied prior to the ophthalmic procedure. Control group infants received placebo stickers with the magnets removed. We compared the primary outcome of Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score during the procedure between the two groups.

Results: A total of 408 patients were randomized, but 14 patients in each of the placebo and intervention groups did not receive ophthalmic examination; leaving 190 patients in control group and 190 in intervention group. Infant characteristics were similar in the two groups, mean PIPP scores during eye exam were significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (median (IQR): 10.00 (5.00,13.00) v 12.00 (7.00,14.00), p = 0.038).

Conclusions: MAA may offer an alternative or adjunct to current non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions to alleviate neonatal pain. Future studies should assess combinations of pain interventions and long term outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

耳磁针刺对新生儿眼科检查疼痛的影响:一项多中心、三盲、随机对照研究。
新生儿眼科检查是一个痛苦的过程。未经治疗的婴儿疼痛经历有短期和长期的后果,疼痛控制是必不可少的。不幸的是,非药物疼痛策略通常是无效的复杂和长期的程序,而许多药物药物有不良反应。耳磁针刺是一种安全有效的镇痛新方法。本研究的目的是进行一项大型三盲随机对照试验,确定MAA用于减轻接受眼科检查的新生儿疼痛。该试验已于2019年11月14日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ID: ChiCTR1900027474)。方法:这是一项在中华人民共和国16所三级医院进行的多中心随机对照试验。如果婴儿出生在26 ~ 42周胎龄(GA),并在研究入组期间入住新生儿重症监护病房(nicu),并计划在第一次接受眼科检查,则有资格参加研究。结果:共有408例患者被随机分组,但安慰剂组和干预组各有14例患者未接受眼科检查;对照组190例,干预组190例。两组患儿的特征相似,干预组在眼部检查时的平均PIPP评分显著低于对照组(IQR中位数:10.00 (5.00,13.00)vs 12.00 (7.00,14.00), p = 0.038)。结论:MAA可能是当前非药物和药物干预措施的替代或辅助手段,以减轻新生儿疼痛。未来的研究应该评估疼痛干预和长期结果的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信