Brachial systolic Pressure averages twice diastolic: evidence from invasive high-fidelity pressure recordings.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Denis Chemla, Mathieu Jozwiak, Olfa Hamzaoui, Pierre Attal, Jean-Louis Teboul
{"title":"Brachial systolic Pressure averages twice diastolic: evidence from invasive high-fidelity pressure recordings.","authors":"Denis Chemla, Mathieu Jozwiak, Olfa Hamzaoui, Pierre Attal, Jean-Louis Teboul","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) are key measurements in cardiovascular assessment. A recent invasive study by our group found that SAP averages twice DAP at the radial and femoral levels. Whether this relationship applies to the brachial artery and central aorta remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by two systematic reviews, we conducted a secondary data analysis of studies that simultaneously reported high-fidelity invasive brachial and aortic pressures in adults undergoing cardiac catheterization. Allowing a ± 2.5% measurement error in SAP and DAP, we defined an acceptable SAP/DAP ratio range of 1.90 to 2.10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included (n = 268; 69% male; mean age 62 years). The weighted mean brachial SAP/DAP ratio was 1.98 (141.6/71.6 mmHg) across the cohort and aligned with our hypothesis in six studies (n = 256; 95% of the population). The one study that did not support the hypothesis was a letter-format publication with a small sample size (n = 12). The hypothesis regarding the aortic SAP/DAP ratio was largely unsupported, being rejected in six studies (n = 232) and in the pooled data (1.89 = 134.7/71.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This preliminary analysis shows that brachial SAP averages twice DAP within a minimal margin of measurement error. These findings highlight a potentially important hemodynamic feature of the brachial artery-and, more generally, of peripheral large arteries, in contrast to the aorta. However, broader validation is needed to assess the clinical relevance of these results beyond the predominantly older male cohort referred for catheterization, and the physiological basis of this pattern also warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) are key measurements in cardiovascular assessment. A recent invasive study by our group found that SAP averages twice DAP at the radial and femoral levels. Whether this relationship applies to the brachial artery and central aorta remains unknown.

Methods: Guided by two systematic reviews, we conducted a secondary data analysis of studies that simultaneously reported high-fidelity invasive brachial and aortic pressures in adults undergoing cardiac catheterization. Allowing a ± 2.5% measurement error in SAP and DAP, we defined an acceptable SAP/DAP ratio range of 1.90 to 2.10.

Results: Seven studies were included (n = 268; 69% male; mean age 62 years). The weighted mean brachial SAP/DAP ratio was 1.98 (141.6/71.6 mmHg) across the cohort and aligned with our hypothesis in six studies (n = 256; 95% of the population). The one study that did not support the hypothesis was a letter-format publication with a small sample size (n = 12). The hypothesis regarding the aortic SAP/DAP ratio was largely unsupported, being rejected in six studies (n = 232) and in the pooled data (1.89 = 134.7/71.4).

Conclusion: This preliminary analysis shows that brachial SAP averages twice DAP within a minimal margin of measurement error. These findings highlight a potentially important hemodynamic feature of the brachial artery-and, more generally, of peripheral large arteries, in contrast to the aorta. However, broader validation is needed to assess the clinical relevance of these results beyond the predominantly older male cohort referred for catheterization, and the physiological basis of this pattern also warrants further investigation.

臂膀收缩压平均为舒张压的两倍:来自有创高保真压力记录的证据。
背景:收缩压(SAP)和舒张压(DAP)是评价心血管疾病的关键指标。我们小组最近的一项侵入性研究发现,SAP在桡骨和股骨水平平均为DAP的两倍。这种关系是否适用于肱动脉和中央主动脉还不清楚。方法:在两篇系统综述的指导下,我们对同时报道成人心导管置入术中高保真侵入性肱动脉和主动脉压力的研究进行了二次数据分析。在SAP和DAP中允许±2.5%的测量误差,我们定义了一个可接受的SAP/DAP比值范围为1.90至2.10。结果:纳入7项研究(n = 268, 69%为男性,平均年龄62岁)。整个队列的加权平均肱SAP/DAP比值为1.98 (141.6/71.6 mmHg),在6项研究(n = 256, 95%的人群)中与我们的假设一致。一项不支持该假设的研究是一篇小样本量的信件格式出版物(n = 12)。关于主动脉SAP/DAP比值的假设在很大程度上没有得到支持,在6项研究(n = 232)和汇总数据(1.89 = 134.7/71.4)中被拒绝。结论:这一初步分析表明,在最小的测量误差范围内,肱SAP平均为DAP的两倍。这些发现强调了与主动脉相比,肱动脉和更普遍的外周大动脉的潜在的重要血流动力学特征。然而,需要更广泛的验证来评估这些结果的临床相关性,而不是主要的老年男性队列,这种模式的生理基础也需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信