AI-driven mixed-methods analysis of technology dependence: Personality-moderated pathways to Oral English anxiety in language learning.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Xiaowei Wang, Shuaijun Lin, Bowen Chen, Hongfeng Zhang
{"title":"AI-driven mixed-methods analysis of technology dependence: Personality-moderated pathways to Oral English anxiety in language learning.","authors":"Xiaowei Wang, Shuaijun Lin, Bowen Chen, Hongfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intelligent education systems are reshaping the language learning ecosystem; however, the psychological mechanisms linking technology dependency (TD) and oral English anxiety (OA) remain under-explored. This study employs a mixed-methods approach grounded in Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988) and Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1986), supplemented by Trait Activation Theory to examine personality moderation associations.Surveying 716 university students in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chongqing, it investigates the mediating effects of psychological burden (PB) and digital self-efficacy (DSE) on the TD-OA relationship, alongside the moderating associations of personality traits. Mplus structural equation modelling was combined with Python XGBoost-SHAP machine learning. SEM revealed an asymmetric dual-path mechanism: PB acted as a complementary mediator, amplifying the positive association between TD and OA, while DSE functioned as a competitive mediator, marginally buffering the association with a path ratio of 7.83:1. Personality traits significantly modulated these relationships: Extraversion (EX) enhanced resilience to technology-induced anxiety, while Neuroticism (NEU) amplified vulnerability. Mixed-methods enhanced predictive accuracy by detecting complex nonlinear interactions. The study contributes in two key areas: 1. A dual-process model explaining technology dependence by highlighting differentiated associations through cognitive load and efficacy pathways; 2.A trait adaptation framework that clarifies how personality traits are associated with psychological adaptation in technology learning environments. Practical implications inform the development of \"anxiety-sensitive\" intelligent tutoring systems. This research advocates for adaptive adjustments based on psychological burden and personality-oriented personalised intervention strategies, emphasizing the importance of protecting learners' mental health while pursuing technological efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"260 ","pages":"105670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intelligent education systems are reshaping the language learning ecosystem; however, the psychological mechanisms linking technology dependency (TD) and oral English anxiety (OA) remain under-explored. This study employs a mixed-methods approach grounded in Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988) and Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1986), supplemented by Trait Activation Theory to examine personality moderation associations.Surveying 716 university students in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chongqing, it investigates the mediating effects of psychological burden (PB) and digital self-efficacy (DSE) on the TD-OA relationship, alongside the moderating associations of personality traits. Mplus structural equation modelling was combined with Python XGBoost-SHAP machine learning. SEM revealed an asymmetric dual-path mechanism: PB acted as a complementary mediator, amplifying the positive association between TD and OA, while DSE functioned as a competitive mediator, marginally buffering the association with a path ratio of 7.83:1. Personality traits significantly modulated these relationships: Extraversion (EX) enhanced resilience to technology-induced anxiety, while Neuroticism (NEU) amplified vulnerability. Mixed-methods enhanced predictive accuracy by detecting complex nonlinear interactions. The study contributes in two key areas: 1. A dual-process model explaining technology dependence by highlighting differentiated associations through cognitive load and efficacy pathways; 2.A trait adaptation framework that clarifies how personality traits are associated with psychological adaptation in technology learning environments. Practical implications inform the development of "anxiety-sensitive" intelligent tutoring systems. This research advocates for adaptive adjustments based on psychological burden and personality-oriented personalised intervention strategies, emphasizing the importance of protecting learners' mental health while pursuing technological efficiency.

人工智能驱动的技术依赖混合方法分析:语言学习中英语口语焦虑的人格调节途径。
智能教育系统正在重塑语言学习生态系统;然而,技术依赖与英语口语焦虑之间的心理机制尚未得到充分的研究。本研究采用以认知负荷理论(Sweller, 1988)和社会认知理论(Bandura, 1986)为基础的混合方法,辅以特质激活理论来检验人格调节关联。本研究以北京、上海、广州、重庆4个城市的716名大学生为调查对象,探讨了心理负担(PB)和数字自我效能感(DSE)对TD-OA关系的中介作用,以及人格特质的调节作用。Mplus结构方程建模与Python XGBoost-SHAP机器学习相结合。SEM揭示了一个不对称的双路径机制:PB作为互补中介,放大了TD和OA之间的正相关关系,而DSE作为竞争中介,以7.83:1的路径比微弱缓冲了二者之间的关联。人格特质显著调节了这些关系:外向性(EX)增强了对技术诱发焦虑的适应能力,而神经质(NEU)放大了脆弱性。混合方法通过检测复杂的非线性相互作用来提高预测精度。该研究在两个关键领域做出了贡献:1。技术依赖的双过程模型:通过认知负荷和效能途径强调不同的关联;2.一个特质适应框架,阐明了技术学习环境中人格特质与心理适应的关系。实际意义为“焦虑敏感”智能辅导系统的发展提供了信息。本研究提倡基于心理负担的适应性调整和以个性为导向的个性化干预策略,强调在追求技术效率的同时保护学习者的心理健康的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信