A Comparison Study Between Electrical Muscle Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Seekaow Churproong, Benjamin Metcalfe, Polly Mcguigan, Dingguo Zhang
{"title":"A Comparison Study Between Electrical Muscle Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome.","authors":"Seekaow Churproong, Benjamin Metcalfe, Polly Mcguigan, Dingguo Zhang","doi":"10.1111/aor.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) originates from myofascial trigger points (MTPs)- hypersensitive nodules commonly found in the trapezius muscle (TM) that cause pain and functional limitations. While transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a conventional treatment, a novel approach combining electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) with active stretching (AS) has recently been developed (EMS + AS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMS electrodes were placed transversely across muscle fibers to induce localized contractions and thus greater stretch of MTP-containing regions compared to AS alone. EMS plays a role similar to a therapist's hand in passive stretching in that it provides resistance force. Forty-one participants with MTPs in the TM received single sessions of EMS + AS, sham stimulation (SS) + AS, and TENS. Each session included three 10-s stimulations with 10-s rest intervals. Pain intensity (PI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and surface electromyography (sEMG) for maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC) amplitude analysis of TM function improvement were the three outcome measures used to assess treatment effectiveness. To evaluate the immediate effects of short-duration treatments with EMS + AS compared to SS + AS and TENS. All three treatments were applied in a randomized order.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EMS + AS showed significant improvements in PI and PPT (t<sub>(40)</sub> = -6.01 and t<sub>(40)</sub> = 5.38, p < 0.001, respectively). EMS + AS showed a small sEMG activity during TM function improvement of 0.49 ± 0.056 %MVC at post-treatment, normalized to pre-treatment values. Compared to SS + AS and TENS, EMS + AS significantly increased PPT changes (F<sub>(2,120)</sub> = 13.442, p < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences in PI or mean %MVC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that EMS generates a local contraction instead of a full contraction for a muscle. EMS's effect is related to the aim of mimicking passive stretching performed by the therapist's hand. Ultimately, EMS + AS has the potential to be an effective approach for alleviating MPS symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) originates from myofascial trigger points (MTPs)- hypersensitive nodules commonly found in the trapezius muscle (TM) that cause pain and functional limitations. While transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a conventional treatment, a novel approach combining electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) with active stretching (AS) has recently been developed (EMS + AS).

Methods: EMS electrodes were placed transversely across muscle fibers to induce localized contractions and thus greater stretch of MTP-containing regions compared to AS alone. EMS plays a role similar to a therapist's hand in passive stretching in that it provides resistance force. Forty-one participants with MTPs in the TM received single sessions of EMS + AS, sham stimulation (SS) + AS, and TENS. Each session included three 10-s stimulations with 10-s rest intervals. Pain intensity (PI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and surface electromyography (sEMG) for maximal voluntary contraction (%MVC) amplitude analysis of TM function improvement were the three outcome measures used to assess treatment effectiveness. To evaluate the immediate effects of short-duration treatments with EMS + AS compared to SS + AS and TENS. All three treatments were applied in a randomized order.

Results: EMS + AS showed significant improvements in PI and PPT (t(40) = -6.01 and t(40) = 5.38, p < 0.001, respectively). EMS + AS showed a small sEMG activity during TM function improvement of 0.49 ± 0.056 %MVC at post-treatment, normalized to pre-treatment values. Compared to SS + AS and TENS, EMS + AS significantly increased PPT changes (F(2,120) = 13.442, p < 0.001); however, there were no significant differences in PI or mean %MVC.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that EMS generates a local contraction instead of a full contraction for a muscle. EMS's effect is related to the aim of mimicking passive stretching performed by the therapist's hand. Ultimately, EMS + AS has the potential to be an effective approach for alleviating MPS symptoms.

肌电刺激与经皮神经电刺激治疗肌筋膜疼痛综合征的比较研究。
背景:肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)起源于肌筋膜触发点(mtp)-通常在斜方肌(TM)中发现的引起疼痛和功能限制的超敏结节。虽然经皮神经电刺激(TENS)是传统的治疗方法,但最近开发了一种将肌肉电刺激(EMS)与主动拉伸(AS)相结合的新方法(EMS + AS)。方法:EMS电极横向放置在肌纤维上,以诱导局部收缩,从而使含有mtp的区域比单独放置更大的拉伸。EMS在被动拉伸中的作用类似于治疗师的手,因为它提供了阻力。41名MTPs患者接受单次EMS + AS、假刺激(SS) + AS和TENS。每个疗程包括三个10秒的刺激和10秒的休息间隔。疼痛强度(PI)、压痛阈值(PPT)和表面肌电图(sEMG)最大自主收缩(%MVC)幅度分析是评估治疗效果的三个结果指标。评价EMS + AS与SS + AS和TENS短时间治疗的即时效果。所有三种治疗均按随机顺序进行。结果:EMS + AS显著改善了PI和PPT (t(40) = -6.01和t(40) = 5.38, p (2120) = 13.442, p)。结论:本研究表明EMS对肌肉产生局部收缩而不是完全收缩。EMS的效果与模仿治疗师的手进行被动拉伸的目的有关。最终,EMS + AS有可能成为缓解MPS症状的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信