Comparing Video-Enhanced Face-to-Face Training and Traditional Verbal Instruction for Anxiety Management in Angiography Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maryam Kiali, Nahid Zarifsanaiey, Mitra Amini
{"title":"Comparing Video-Enhanced Face-to-Face Training and Traditional Verbal Instruction for Anxiety Management in Angiography Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Maryam Kiali,&nbsp;Nahid Zarifsanaiey,&nbsp;Mitra Amini","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing angiography often experience heightened anxiety, which can adversely affect procedural outcomes. This study compared the efficacy of video-assisted face-to-face training versus conventional verbal instruction in reducing anxiety among angiography patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed at a Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS)-affiliated hospital (April 2023–December 2023). Of 180 initially enrolled patients, 174 were randomized into two groups: video-assisted face-to-face training (intervention, <i>n</i> = 87) or verbal instruction (control, <i>n</i> = 87). The intervention group received a structured 10-min educational video (accessible via TV and mobile devices) followed by face-to-face discussions with a nurse, while the control group received standard verbal instructions. Anxiety was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 1 day before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using independent-samples <i>t</i>-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and effect sizes (Cohen's <i>d</i>), with significance set at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Post-intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower state anxiety scores (mean ± SD: 34.15 ± 7.72) compared to the control group (mean ± SD: 39.85 ± 9.87), (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.64). Both groups showed significant within-group anxiety reduction (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Demographic analysis revealed that higher education levels, employment status, and income were associated with lower anxiety (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005), whereas underlying diseases correlated only with pre-intervention anxiety (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Video-assisted face-to-face training was more effective than verbal instruction in reducing pre-angiography anxiety, with a moderate clinical effect. Demographic factors influenced outcomes, suggesting tailored educational approaches may optimize anxiety management in high-risk subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71214","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Patients undergoing angiography often experience heightened anxiety, which can adversely affect procedural outcomes. This study compared the efficacy of video-assisted face-to-face training versus conventional verbal instruction in reducing anxiety among angiography patients.

Methods

A pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed at a Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS)-affiliated hospital (April 2023–December 2023). Of 180 initially enrolled patients, 174 were randomized into two groups: video-assisted face-to-face training (intervention, n = 87) or verbal instruction (control, n = 87). The intervention group received a structured 10-min educational video (accessible via TV and mobile devices) followed by face-to-face discussions with a nurse, while the control group received standard verbal instructions. Anxiety was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 1 day before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and effect sizes (Cohen's d), with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

Post-intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower state anxiety scores (mean ± SD: 34.15 ± 7.72) compared to the control group (mean ± SD: 39.85 ± 9.87), (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.64). Both groups showed significant within-group anxiety reduction (p < 0.001). Demographic analysis revealed that higher education levels, employment status, and income were associated with lower anxiety (p < 0.005), whereas underlying diseases correlated only with pre-intervention anxiety (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Video-assisted face-to-face training was more effective than verbal instruction in reducing pre-angiography anxiety, with a moderate clinical effect. Demographic factors influenced outcomes, suggesting tailored educational approaches may optimize anxiety management in high-risk subgroups.

Abstract Image

比较视频增强面对面训练和传统口头教学对血管造影术患者焦虑管理:一项准实验研究
背景和目的接受血管造影的患者通常会经历高度焦虑,这可能对手术结果产生不利影响。本研究比较了视频辅助面对面训练与传统口头指导在减少血管造影患者焦虑方面的效果。方法采用前测后测准实验设计,于2023年4月~ 2023年12月在设拉子医科大学附属医院进行实验。在180名最初入选的患者中,174名随机分为两组:视频辅助面对面培训(干预,n = 87)或口头指导(对照组,n = 87)。干预组接受了一段10分钟的结构化教育视频(可通过电视和移动设备访问),随后与护士进行了面对面的讨论,而对照组则接受了标准的口头指导。干预前后1天使用Spielberger状态-特质焦虑量表测量焦虑。数据分析采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和效应量(Cohen’s d),显著性设置为p <; 0.05。结果干预后,干预组状态焦虑评分(mean±SD: 34.15±7.72)显著低于对照组(mean±SD: 39.85±9.87),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001, Cohen’SD = 0.64)。两组均显示组内焦虑显著减少(p < 0.001)。人口统计学分析显示,高等教育水平、就业状况和收入与较低的焦虑相关(p < 0.005),而基础疾病仅与干预前焦虑相关(p < 0.01)。结论视频辅助面授训练比口头指导更能有效降低血管造影前焦虑,临床效果中等。人口统计学因素影响结果,表明量身定制的教育方法可以优化高危亚组的焦虑管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信