Investigation of Recharge Sources, Mechanisms, and Rates to the Shallow Aquifer Within Shelby County, TN, USA

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sagar Singh Airee, Brian Waldron, Daniel Larsen, Scott Schoefernacker, Rodrigo Villalpando-Vizcaino
{"title":"Investigation of Recharge Sources, Mechanisms, and Rates to the Shallow Aquifer Within Shelby County, TN, USA","authors":"Sagar Singh Airee,&nbsp;Brian Waldron,&nbsp;Daniel Larsen,&nbsp;Scott Schoefernacker,&nbsp;Rodrigo Villalpando-Vizcaino","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Determination of recharge rates for an urban setting is a complicated process that is subject to variation based on the chosen methodology, as well as the suitability and constraints of each method. The recharge mechanism and rates to the shallow aquifer within Shelby County were assessed using multiple approaches, including the water-table fluctuations (WTF) method (using two approaches), the vadose zone pulsing method, the chemical tracer method, and the identification of areas with potential infrastructure leaks. The WTF method generated a total annual recharge rate ranging from 0.12 m/year, or 9% of precipitation (for S<sub>y</sub> = 0.1), to 2.17 m/year, or 158% of precipitation (for S<sub>y</sub> = 0.3), using the master recession curve (MRC) method. The large disparity in results could be due to the influence of surface-water features, additional recharge from underground water infrastructure, and high specific yield. However, the vadose zone pulsing method failed to yield any definitive outcomes, while the chemical tracer method revealed no significant presence of fluoridated municipal water flowing into the shallow aquifer. The results of WTF appeared to be more coherent and more reasonable than the other approaches. Additional regional-scale techniques and a comprehensive investigation of artificial recharge computation via leakage should be conducted to obtain more accurate estimations of recharge rate.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"61 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determination of recharge rates for an urban setting is a complicated process that is subject to variation based on the chosen methodology, as well as the suitability and constraints of each method. The recharge mechanism and rates to the shallow aquifer within Shelby County were assessed using multiple approaches, including the water-table fluctuations (WTF) method (using two approaches), the vadose zone pulsing method, the chemical tracer method, and the identification of areas with potential infrastructure leaks. The WTF method generated a total annual recharge rate ranging from 0.12 m/year, or 9% of precipitation (for Sy = 0.1), to 2.17 m/year, or 158% of precipitation (for Sy = 0.3), using the master recession curve (MRC) method. The large disparity in results could be due to the influence of surface-water features, additional recharge from underground water infrastructure, and high specific yield. However, the vadose zone pulsing method failed to yield any definitive outcomes, while the chemical tracer method revealed no significant presence of fluoridated municipal water flowing into the shallow aquifer. The results of WTF appeared to be more coherent and more reasonable than the other approaches. Additional regional-scale techniques and a comprehensive investigation of artificial recharge computation via leakage should be conducted to obtain more accurate estimations of recharge rate.

Abstract Image

美国田纳西州谢尔比县浅层含水层补给来源、机制和速率的调查
确定城市环境的补给率是一个复杂的过程,根据所选择的方法以及每种方法的适用性和局限性而有所不同。采用多种方法对谢尔比县浅层含水层的补给机制和速率进行了评估,包括地下水位波动(WTF)法(使用两种方法)、渗透带脉冲法、化学示踪法以及潜在基础设施泄漏区域的识别。采用主衰退曲线(MRC)方法,WTF方法得到的年总补给率为0.12 m/年,占降水量的9%(当Sy = 0.1时)至2.17 m/年,占降水量的158%(当Sy = 0.3时)。结果的巨大差异可能是由于地表水特征的影响,地下水基础设施的额外补给以及高比产。然而,渗透带脉冲法未能得出任何明确的结果,而化学示踪法显示,流入浅层含水层的含氟市政用水没有显著存在。WTF的结果似乎比其他方法更连贯,更合理。为了获得更准确的补给率估计,还需要进行额外的区域尺度技术和通过泄漏进行人工补给计算的全面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The American Water Resources Association
Journal of The American Water Resources Association 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy. JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信