Atef Oreiby, Hazim O. Khalifa, Mohamed A. A. Abdelhamid, Mohamed Borham, Ayman S. Seada, Ragab M. Fereig, Robert Barigye, Gobena Ameni, Arve Lee Willingham, Yamen Hegazy
{"title":"A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of the Two Major Brucella species in Mediterranean Basin Countries","authors":"Atef Oreiby, Hazim O. Khalifa, Mohamed A. A. Abdelhamid, Mohamed Borham, Ayman S. Seada, Ragab M. Fereig, Robert Barigye, Gobena Ameni, Arve Lee Willingham, Yamen Hegazy","doi":"10.1155/tbed/2502968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of brucellosis major causative bacteria <i>Brucella abortus</i> and <i>Brucella melitensis</i> is complicating human treatment strategies in the Mediterranean basin, where the disease was first reported and is still endemic. The current meta-analysis examines the prevalence and patterns of AMR in 119 <i>Brucella abortus</i> and 1344 <i>Brucella melitensis</i> isolates across Mediterranean countries, highlighting significant geographical disparities in resistance data. The E-test and disc diffusion were mostly used for measuring antimicrobial susceptibility, which was validated by the CLSI guidelines of <i>Haemophilus</i> spp. or bacteria of bioterrorism. Genotypic detection of resistance was conducted in a few studies. Despite the documented burden of brucellosis, studies on AMR remain scarce, particularly in North Africa, the Middle East, and several European Mediterranean nations. Comparative phenotypic–genotypic resistograms were reported in only a few studies, yet they are essential for understanding the mechanisms of AMR in this serious zoonotic pathogen. The analysis revealed a high overall AMR proportion (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%–51%) with considerable heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Notable differences in resistance were observed between regions, with African Mediterranean countries exhibiting the highest resistance rates (71%, 95% CI: 44%–94%) and European Mediterranean countries the lowest (9%, 95% CI: 0%–42%). Eastern Mediterranean countries exhibited higher resistance rates than their western counterparts (<i>p</i> = 0.11). <i>Brucella abortus</i> showed higher resistance (63%, 95% CI: 25%–95%) than <i>Brucella melitensis</i> (24%, 95% CI: 8%–43%). Isolates of bovine origin displayed the highest percentage of resistance (89%, 95% CI: 69%–100%) compared to isolates of other origins. Resistance to rifampicin and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was generally low, but macrolide resistance, especially to azithromycin, was notably higher in African countries (<i>p</i> < 0.01). This study underscores the need for standardized AMR surveillance based on Brucella-specific validation criteria, which are lacking, improved testing methodologies, and region-specific interventions to address AMR in brucellosis, particularly in livestock, where resistance is more prevalent. The findings highlight the importance of targeted antibiotic stewardship and monitoring to mitigate the spread of resistant Brucella strains and protect public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/2502968","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/2502968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of brucellosis major causative bacteria Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis is complicating human treatment strategies in the Mediterranean basin, where the disease was first reported and is still endemic. The current meta-analysis examines the prevalence and patterns of AMR in 119 Brucella abortus and 1344 Brucella melitensis isolates across Mediterranean countries, highlighting significant geographical disparities in resistance data. The E-test and disc diffusion were mostly used for measuring antimicrobial susceptibility, which was validated by the CLSI guidelines of Haemophilus spp. or bacteria of bioterrorism. Genotypic detection of resistance was conducted in a few studies. Despite the documented burden of brucellosis, studies on AMR remain scarce, particularly in North Africa, the Middle East, and several European Mediterranean nations. Comparative phenotypic–genotypic resistograms were reported in only a few studies, yet they are essential for understanding the mechanisms of AMR in this serious zoonotic pathogen. The analysis revealed a high overall AMR proportion (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16%–51%) with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, p < 0.01). Notable differences in resistance were observed between regions, with African Mediterranean countries exhibiting the highest resistance rates (71%, 95% CI: 44%–94%) and European Mediterranean countries the lowest (9%, 95% CI: 0%–42%). Eastern Mediterranean countries exhibited higher resistance rates than their western counterparts (p = 0.11). Brucella abortus showed higher resistance (63%, 95% CI: 25%–95%) than Brucella melitensis (24%, 95% CI: 8%–43%). Isolates of bovine origin displayed the highest percentage of resistance (89%, 95% CI: 69%–100%) compared to isolates of other origins. Resistance to rifampicin and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole was generally low, but macrolide resistance, especially to azithromycin, was notably higher in African countries (p < 0.01). This study underscores the need for standardized AMR surveillance based on Brucella-specific validation criteria, which are lacking, improved testing methodologies, and region-specific interventions to address AMR in brucellosis, particularly in livestock, where resistance is more prevalent. The findings highlight the importance of targeted antibiotic stewardship and monitoring to mitigate the spread of resistant Brucella strains and protect public health.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.