Expanding Descriptions of Autistic Rituals and Routines: A Co-Produced Update

Stephanie Petty, Amy Cantwell, Lindsay Clayton, Lucy Matthews, Stuart Angell-McGregor
{"title":"Expanding Descriptions of Autistic Rituals and Routines: A Co-Produced Update","authors":"Stephanie Petty,&nbsp;Amy Cantwell,&nbsp;Lindsay Clayton,&nbsp;Lucy Matthews,&nbsp;Stuart Angell-McGregor","doi":"10.1002/dvr2.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Descriptions of rituals and routines inform autism assessment and diagnosis and remain influential when determining what being autistic means. Currently they present autistic characteristics as problematic. Examples slowly catch-up with research that shows their personal appearances and meanings. We explored what happens when descriptions of autistic rituals and routines are co-authored by autistic people. In this qualitative participatory study in the UK, 12 autistic adults contributed via interviews, written exchanges, and data analysis/writing sessions. We identified five themes using codebook thematic analysis: (1) ways of talking about rituals and routines; (2) meanings; (3) visibility; (4) what makes a ritual or routine autistic; and (5) when rituals and routines become detrimental. Rituals were frequently hidden. They had superstitious qualities that achieved a subjective sense of things being ‘OK’. They were behaviours, repetitive thoughts, and mental checks. Whilst there were both positive and negative impacts of performing rituals and routines, it was reliability, necessity, and devotion to them that characterised them as autistic behaviours. There is an important re-narration of the ‘inflexibility’ or ‘rigidity’ of autistic repetitive behaviours when authored by autistic people, which appreciates the demands of navigating neurotypical-default environments. Autistic adults emphasised a heavily-tipped scale in the direction of valuing rituals and routines over censoring them.</p>","PeriodicalId":100379,"journal":{"name":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dvr2.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity & Inclusion Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvr2.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Descriptions of rituals and routines inform autism assessment and diagnosis and remain influential when determining what being autistic means. Currently they present autistic characteristics as problematic. Examples slowly catch-up with research that shows their personal appearances and meanings. We explored what happens when descriptions of autistic rituals and routines are co-authored by autistic people. In this qualitative participatory study in the UK, 12 autistic adults contributed via interviews, written exchanges, and data analysis/writing sessions. We identified five themes using codebook thematic analysis: (1) ways of talking about rituals and routines; (2) meanings; (3) visibility; (4) what makes a ritual or routine autistic; and (5) when rituals and routines become detrimental. Rituals were frequently hidden. They had superstitious qualities that achieved a subjective sense of things being ‘OK’. They were behaviours, repetitive thoughts, and mental checks. Whilst there were both positive and negative impacts of performing rituals and routines, it was reliability, necessity, and devotion to them that characterised them as autistic behaviours. There is an important re-narration of the ‘inflexibility’ or ‘rigidity’ of autistic repetitive behaviours when authored by autistic people, which appreciates the demands of navigating neurotypical-default environments. Autistic adults emphasised a heavily-tipped scale in the direction of valuing rituals and routines over censoring them.

Abstract Image

扩展自闭症仪式和惯例的描述:共同制作的更新
对仪式和惯例的描述为自闭症的评估和诊断提供了信息,并且在确定自闭症的意义时仍然具有影响力。目前他们认为自闭症特征是有问题的。例子慢慢地赶上了研究,显示了它们的个人外观和含义。我们探索了当自闭症患者共同撰写自闭症仪式和日常活动的描述时会发生什么。在英国进行的这项定性参与研究中,12名自闭症成年人通过访谈、书面交流和数据分析/写作会议做出了贡献。我们使用密码本主题分析确定了五个主题:(1)谈论仪式和惯例的方式;(2)意义;(3)可见性;(4)是什么使一种仪式或常规自闭;(5)当仪式和惯例变得有害时。仪式经常被隐藏起来。他们有一种迷信的特质,主观地认为事情是“好的”。它们是行为、重复的想法和心理检查。虽然执行仪式和例行公事既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响,但对它们的可靠性、必要性和奉献精神是自闭症行为的特征。自闭症患者对自闭症重复行为的“不灵活”或“僵化”进行了重要的重新叙述,这是对导航神经典型默认环境的需求的赞赏。自闭症成年人强调了一个高度倾斜的尺度,即重视仪式和惯例,而不是审查它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信