{"title":"Evaluation of One-Year Survival and Quality of Life After Intensive Care: A Retrospective 5-Year Study","authors":"Recep Civan Yüksel, Birkan Ülger, Kamil Deveci, Şahin Temel, Murat Sungur, Kürşat Gündoğan","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/9302538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background/Objective:</b> The post-intensive care unit (ICU) period significantly impacts patients’ overall well-being, raising concerns among patients, families, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers. This study aims to evaluate 1-year survival rates, return to work, and daily functionality of individuals discharged from the ICU.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted in a medical ICU, focusing on patients with a minimum 48-h ICU stay who were subsequently discharged from the hospital.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The study included 154 patients with a median age of 51 (IQR: 34–68) years, of whom 79 (51%) were male. The 1-year mortality rate was 23.4%. Within the first year, rehospitalization occurred in 54.5%, and ICU readmission was observed in 20.1%. Notably, 89.8% of the patients were able to perform self-care activities, such as toileting and dressing. However, 63.6% of the patients had not returned to work within the first year. A comparison between patients requiring critical interventions and those who did not revealed a return-to-work rate of 21.4% for the former and 50% for the latter (<i>p</i> = 0.002).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The findings indicate that approximately one-quarter of patients treated in intensive care and discharged from the hospital died within 1 year. While a significant proportion (90%) could independently manage self-care tasks, the majority experienced delays in returning to work. These findings highlight the need for enhanced post-ICU care to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/9302538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/9302538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objective: The post-intensive care unit (ICU) period significantly impacts patients’ overall well-being, raising concerns among patients, families, healthcare professionals, and decision-makers. This study aims to evaluate 1-year survival rates, return to work, and daily functionality of individuals discharged from the ICU.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in a medical ICU, focusing on patients with a minimum 48-h ICU stay who were subsequently discharged from the hospital.
Results: The study included 154 patients with a median age of 51 (IQR: 34–68) years, of whom 79 (51%) were male. The 1-year mortality rate was 23.4%. Within the first year, rehospitalization occurred in 54.5%, and ICU readmission was observed in 20.1%. Notably, 89.8% of the patients were able to perform self-care activities, such as toileting and dressing. However, 63.6% of the patients had not returned to work within the first year. A comparison between patients requiring critical interventions and those who did not revealed a return-to-work rate of 21.4% for the former and 50% for the latter (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: The findings indicate that approximately one-quarter of patients treated in intensive care and discharged from the hospital died within 1 year. While a significant proportion (90%) could independently manage self-care tasks, the majority experienced delays in returning to work. These findings highlight the need for enhanced post-ICU care to improve patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.