Automation, Economic Growth, and the Income Distribution in a Two-Class Economy

IF 0.9 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Metroeconomica Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1111/meca.12502
Shogo Ogawa, Takefumi Hagiwara, Thu Giang Huong Pham, Noriki Fukatani, Naoto Okahara, Hiroaki Sasaki
{"title":"Automation, Economic Growth, and the Income Distribution in a Two-Class Economy","authors":"Shogo Ogawa,&nbsp;Takefumi Hagiwara,&nbsp;Thu Giang Huong Pham,&nbsp;Noriki Fukatani,&nbsp;Naoto Okahara,&nbsp;Hiroaki Sasaki","doi":"10.1111/meca.12502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study presents a growth model with automation technology to consider two classes, workers and capitalists, and investigates how the existence of automation capital affects economic growth and the income distribution. In addition to the two production factors, labor and traditional capital, we consider automation capital as a third production factor. We also introduce Pasinetti-type saving functions into the model to investigate how the difference between the savings rates of capitalists and workers affects economic growth and the income distribution. We find that when the savings rate of capitalists is above a threshold level, per capita output exhibits endogenous growth irrespective of the savings rate of workers. In this case, the income gap between workers and capitalists widens over time. By contrast, when the savings rate of capitalists is below the threshold level, two long-run states occur depending on the savings rate of workers: the share of automation capital of capitalists approaches either a constant or zero. In both cases, per capita output growth is zero and the income gap between the two classes becomes constant over time. We additionally show that the introduction of a redistribution policy that imposes a robot tax on capitalists can narrow the income gap between workers and capitalists. However, this income redistribution policy lowers per capita output growth. Therefore, there is a trade-off between equality and growth.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46885,"journal":{"name":"Metroeconomica","volume":"76 4","pages":"527-544"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metroeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.12502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a growth model with automation technology to consider two classes, workers and capitalists, and investigates how the existence of automation capital affects economic growth and the income distribution. In addition to the two production factors, labor and traditional capital, we consider automation capital as a third production factor. We also introduce Pasinetti-type saving functions into the model to investigate how the difference between the savings rates of capitalists and workers affects economic growth and the income distribution. We find that when the savings rate of capitalists is above a threshold level, per capita output exhibits endogenous growth irrespective of the savings rate of workers. In this case, the income gap between workers and capitalists widens over time. By contrast, when the savings rate of capitalists is below the threshold level, two long-run states occur depending on the savings rate of workers: the share of automation capital of capitalists approaches either a constant or zero. In both cases, per capita output growth is zero and the income gap between the two classes becomes constant over time. We additionally show that the introduction of a redistribution policy that imposes a robot tax on capitalists can narrow the income gap between workers and capitalists. However, this income redistribution policy lowers per capita output growth. Therefore, there is a trade-off between equality and growth.

Abstract Image

自动化、经济增长和两阶级经济中的收入分配
本文提出了一个包含自动化技术的增长模型,考虑了工人和资本家两个阶层,并探讨了自动化资本的存在如何影响经济增长和收入分配。除了劳动力和传统资本这两个生产要素之外,我们认为自动化资本是第三个生产要素。我们还在模型中引入pasineti型储蓄函数,以研究资本家和工人储蓄率的差异如何影响经济增长和收入分配。我们发现,当资本家的储蓄率高于阈值水平时,无论工人的储蓄率如何,人均产出都表现出内生增长。在这种情况下,工人和资本家之间的收入差距随着时间的推移而扩大。相比之下,当资本家的储蓄率低于阈值水平时,根据工人的储蓄率会出现两种长期状态:资本家的自动化资本份额要么接近常数,要么接近零。在这两种情况下,人均产出增长都是零,两个阶层之间的收入差距随着时间的推移变得不变。我们还表明,引入对资本家征收机器人税的再分配政策可以缩小工人和资本家之间的收入差距。然而,这种收入再分配政策降低了人均产出增长。因此,在平等和增长之间存在一种权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metroeconomica
Metroeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信