Factors Influencing Mental Burden Caused by Flooding: Insights from the 2021 Flood in the Ahr Valley (Germany)

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tabea Klör, Philip Bubeck, Rainer Bell, Annegret H. Thieken
{"title":"Factors Influencing Mental Burden Caused by Flooding: Insights from the 2021 Flood in the Ahr Valley (Germany)","authors":"Tabea Klör,&nbsp;Philip Bubeck,&nbsp;Rainer Bell,&nbsp;Annegret H. Thieken","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The number of individuals exposed to flooding is increasing and is projected to increase in the future. Catastrophic events like the July 2021 flood in Germany's Ahr Valley (Rhineland-Palatinate) illustrate the severe and often long-lasting mental health impacts such disasters can cause. However, research on the psychological consequences of extreme flooding remains less developed than studies on physical damage. Gaining a clearer understanding of individual mental burden following such events is essential for tailoring recovery efforts to address mental health needs effectively. This study investigates how various factors—including flood characteristics, circumstances of the recovery process, personal characteristics, perceptions, and sociodemographic characteristics—affect self-reported mental burden. Using binary logistic regression, we analyzed responses from 277 individuals affected by the July 2021 flood in the Ahrweiler district. Results show that even 18 months after the event, 42.6% of respondents continued to experience high to very high levels of mental burden. Interestingly, the analysis found that sociodemographic variables—particularly, health status—and personal characteristics and perceptions (e.g., persistent mental preoccupation) had a greater impact on mental burden than the characteristics of the flood or the reconstruction process. Considering the strong impact of health status, health monitoring of affected populations may help identify individuals at greater risk, ensuring timely and targeted mental health interventions. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating long-term psychosocial support into disaster recovery strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of individuals exposed to flooding is increasing and is projected to increase in the future. Catastrophic events like the July 2021 flood in Germany's Ahr Valley (Rhineland-Palatinate) illustrate the severe and often long-lasting mental health impacts such disasters can cause. However, research on the psychological consequences of extreme flooding remains less developed than studies on physical damage. Gaining a clearer understanding of individual mental burden following such events is essential for tailoring recovery efforts to address mental health needs effectively. This study investigates how various factors—including flood characteristics, circumstances of the recovery process, personal characteristics, perceptions, and sociodemographic characteristics—affect self-reported mental burden. Using binary logistic regression, we analyzed responses from 277 individuals affected by the July 2021 flood in the Ahrweiler district. Results show that even 18 months after the event, 42.6% of respondents continued to experience high to very high levels of mental burden. Interestingly, the analysis found that sociodemographic variables—particularly, health status—and personal characteristics and perceptions (e.g., persistent mental preoccupation) had a greater impact on mental burden than the characteristics of the flood or the reconstruction process. Considering the strong impact of health status, health monitoring of affected populations may help identify individuals at greater risk, ensuring timely and targeted mental health interventions. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating long-term psychosocial support into disaster recovery strategies.

Abstract Image

影响洪水造成精神负担的因素:来自2021年Ahr河谷洪水(德国)的启示
受洪水影响的人数正在增加,预计未来还会增加。像2021年7月在德国Ahr山谷(莱茵兰-普法尔茨)发生的洪水这样的灾难性事件说明了这类灾难可能造成的严重且往往是长期的心理健康影响。然而,对极端洪水的心理后果的研究仍然比对物理损害的研究欠发达。在此类事件发生后,更清楚地了解个人的精神负担,对于调整恢复工作以有效地解决心理健康需求至关重要。本研究调查了各种因素——包括洪水特征、恢复过程的环境、个人特征、观念和社会人口特征——如何影响自我报告的精神负担。利用二元logistic回归分析了Ahrweiler地区受2021年7月洪水影响的277名个体的反应。结果显示,即使在事件发生18个月后,42.6%的受访者仍然经历着很高或非常高的精神负担。有趣的是,分析发现,社会人口变量——特别是健康状况——和个人特征和观念(例如,持续的心理关注)对心理负担的影响比洪水或重建过程的特征更大。考虑到健康状况的巨大影响,对受影响人群进行健康监测可能有助于确定风险较大的个人,确保及时和有针对性的精神卫生干预。这些发现强调了将长期社会心理支持纳入灾后恢复战略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信