Life’s Essential 8 and Mortality Risk in Cardiovascular Disease: Results From a Nationwide Population Survey

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yang Zhang, Zhiwei Xu, Lin Li, Xiaoya Hong, Hui Xia
{"title":"Life’s Essential 8 and Mortality Risk in Cardiovascular Disease: Results From a Nationwide Population Survey","authors":"Yang Zhang,&nbsp;Zhiwei Xu,&nbsp;Lin Li,&nbsp;Xiaoya Hong,&nbsp;Hui Xia","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/6659458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Life’s Essential 8 (LE8), a comprehensive metric integrating behavioral and physiological cardiovascular health factors, may serve as a valuable stratification tool for identifying high-risk subgroups within patients already diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, we analyzed data from 3681 individuals with CVD from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2018) linked with mortality data. LE8 scores were calculated based on multidomain health indicators, and survival outcomes were assessed across score quartiles. We employed adjusted weighted Cox regression analyses, which accounted for the complex survey design by incorporating appropriate sample weights, strata, and primary sampling units through survey-weighted statistical methods. Higher LE8 scores were significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted HR per unit increase: 0.76 and 95% CI: 0.69–0.85), with a 60% reduction in mortality risk observed in the highest quartile compared with the lowest. These associations remained robust after adjustment for key sociodemographic covariates. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed a dose-response relationship between LE8 and mortality risk. Our findings underscore the value of composite health metrics such as LE8 in refining disease taxonomies, enhancing risk stratification, and potentially guiding personalized intervention strategies. This population-scale phenotypic analysis offers a clinical foundation for future AI-driven or multiomics investigations to unravel the mechanistic underpinnings and identify modifiable therapeutic targets among phenotypically diverse CVD populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/6659458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/6659458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life’s Essential 8 (LE8), a comprehensive metric integrating behavioral and physiological cardiovascular health factors, may serve as a valuable stratification tool for identifying high-risk subgroups within patients already diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, we analyzed data from 3681 individuals with CVD from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2018) linked with mortality data. LE8 scores were calculated based on multidomain health indicators, and survival outcomes were assessed across score quartiles. We employed adjusted weighted Cox regression analyses, which accounted for the complex survey design by incorporating appropriate sample weights, strata, and primary sampling units through survey-weighted statistical methods. Higher LE8 scores were significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted HR per unit increase: 0.76 and 95% CI: 0.69–0.85), with a 60% reduction in mortality risk observed in the highest quartile compared with the lowest. These associations remained robust after adjustment for key sociodemographic covariates. Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed a dose-response relationship between LE8 and mortality risk. Our findings underscore the value of composite health metrics such as LE8 in refining disease taxonomies, enhancing risk stratification, and potentially guiding personalized intervention strategies. This population-scale phenotypic analysis offers a clinical foundation for future AI-driven or multiomics investigations to unravel the mechanistic underpinnings and identify modifiable therapeutic targets among phenotypically diverse CVD populations.

Abstract Image

心血管疾病的生命要素和死亡风险:来自全国人口调查的结果
Life 's Essential 8 (LE8)是一种综合心血管健康行为和生理因素的综合指标,可作为一种有价值的分层工具,用于识别已诊断为心血管疾病(CVD)的患者中的高危亚群。在这项研究中,我们分析了来自美国国家健康与营养检查调查(2007-2018)的3681名心血管疾病患者的数据,这些数据与死亡率数据相关。根据多域健康指标计算LE8评分,并在评分四分位数上评估生存结果。我们采用调整加权Cox回归分析,通过调查加权统计方法纳入适当的样本权重、地层和主要抽样单位,从而解释了复杂的调查设计。较高的LE8评分与全因死亡率的降低显著相关(调整后的单位死亡率增加:0.76,95% CI: 0.69-0.85),与最低四分位数相比,最高四分位数的死亡风险降低了60%。在对关键的社会人口协变量进行调整后,这些关联仍然很强。限制性三次样条分析证实了LE8与死亡风险之间的剂量-反应关系。我们的研究结果强调了LE8等复合健康指标在完善疾病分类、加强风险分层和潜在指导个性化干预策略方面的价值。这种群体规模的表型分析为未来人工智能驱动或多组学研究提供了临床基础,以揭示机制基础,并在表型不同的心血管疾病人群中确定可改变的治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信