Validity and Reliability of Bengali Language Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Version on Patients With Frozen Shoulder at a Rehabilitation Centre in Bangladesh: A Validation Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abid Hasan Khan, Md. Saruar Hossain Bhuiyan, H. M. Al-Amin, Rajib Sutradhar, Md. Sherajul Haque
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of Bengali Language Shoulder Pain and Disability Index Version on Patients With Frozen Shoulder at a Rehabilitation Centre in Bangladesh: A Validation Study","authors":"Abid Hasan Khan,&nbsp;Md. Saruar Hossain Bhuiyan,&nbsp;H. M. Al-Amin,&nbsp;Rajib Sutradhar,&nbsp;Md. Sherajul Haque","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) is a commonly utilized outcome measure. The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Bengali version of the SPADI among patients with frozen shoulder.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SPADI was administered to 103 patients with frozen shoulder receiving physiotherapy at Centre for the rehabilitation of the paralyzed (CRP), a well-known rehabilitation hospital in Bangladesh. Among these patients, 31 underwent a retest after 15 days. To evaluate the construct validity of the SPADI, the scores were compared with other outcome measures, including the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH), the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Structural validity was assessed using a two-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Additionally, the study analyzed internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and measurement error.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This study validated the Bengali version of the SPADI for frozen shoulder (FS). It showed strong psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (pain <i>α</i> = 0.842, disability <i>α</i> = 0.878), and reliability (ICC &gt; 0.98). A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a two-factor structure (CFI = 0.985). Findings highlight SPADI's value in FS assessment while emphasizing its limitations in capturing broader quality-of-life impacts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The Bengali version of SPADI showed good reliability and validity in a group of patients with frozen shoulder. This means that it is a dependable and accurate tool for measuring shoulder pain and disability in these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71333","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

The shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) is a commonly utilized outcome measure. The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Bengali version of the SPADI among patients with frozen shoulder.

Methods

The SPADI was administered to 103 patients with frozen shoulder receiving physiotherapy at Centre for the rehabilitation of the paralyzed (CRP), a well-known rehabilitation hospital in Bangladesh. Among these patients, 31 underwent a retest after 15 days. To evaluate the construct validity of the SPADI, the scores were compared with other outcome measures, including the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH), the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Structural validity was assessed using a two-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Additionally, the study analyzed internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and measurement error.

Results

This study validated the Bengali version of the SPADI for frozen shoulder (FS). It showed strong psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (pain α = 0.842, disability α = 0.878), and reliability (ICC > 0.98). A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a two-factor structure (CFI = 0.985). Findings highlight SPADI's value in FS assessment while emphasizing its limitations in capturing broader quality-of-life impacts.

Conclusion

The Bengali version of SPADI showed good reliability and validity in a group of patients with frozen shoulder. This means that it is a dependable and accurate tool for measuring shoulder pain and disability in these patients.

Abstract Image

孟加拉康复中心对肩关节冻结患者孟加拉语肩关节疼痛和残疾指数的效度和信度:一项验证研究
背景与目的肩痛与失能指数(SPADI)是一种常用的预后指标。该研究旨在评估孟加拉版SPADI在肩周炎患者中的可靠性和有效性。方法对孟加拉国知名康复医院瘫痪康复中心(CRP)接受物理治疗的103例肩周炎患者进行SPADI治疗。其中31例患者在15天后复查。为了评估SPADI的结构效度,将得分与其他结果测量进行比较,包括手臂、肩膀和手部残疾问卷(DASH)、数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)和36项简短健康调查(SF-36)。采用双因素验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度。此外,本研究还分析了内部一致性、重测信度和测量误差。结果本研究验证了孟加拉版的SPADI治疗肩周炎(FS)。它具有较强的心理测量特性,具有较高的内部一致性(疼痛α = 0.842,残疾α = 0.878)和信度(ICC > 0.98)。验证性因子分析证实存在双因子结构(CFI = 0.985)。研究结果强调了SPADI在FS评估中的价值,同时强调了其在捕捉更广泛的生活质量影响方面的局限性。结论孟加拉语版SPADI在肩周炎患者中具有良好的信度和效度。这意味着它是测量这些患者肩痛和残疾的可靠和准确的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信