Shifting Racialised Borders and the Right to Exit Within Europe

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Julija Sardelić
{"title":"Shifting Racialised Borders and the Right to Exit Within Europe","authors":"Julija Sardelić","doi":"10.1111/imig.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper investigates how countries within Europe limit and control the right to exit of negatively racialised minorities, especially Roma. Based on a socio-legal analysis of four case studies, the paper argues that ‘countries of origin’ limit the right to exit in collaboration with possible countries of destination. They do so by making different multilateral and bilateral agreements, which promise countries of origin a sort of reward (like visa-free travel for majority citizens), while countries of destination use it as a ‘remote control’ to prevent access to their territory to unwanted migrants. The paper discusses the following examples: first, the case of the UK's border officers being stationed at the Prague airport, disproportionately not allowing Roma to board flights to the UK. Second, it discusses the incentives France used to discourage Romani EU citizens from leaving Romania and Bulgaria towards France. Third, it investigates European Parliament restrictions on the visa-free regime, should there be a greater number of Romani asylum seekers from non-EU former Yugoslav countries. And fourth, the impediments Romani refugees faced when trying to exit Ukraine after the full-scale Russian invasion.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.70087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates how countries within Europe limit and control the right to exit of negatively racialised minorities, especially Roma. Based on a socio-legal analysis of four case studies, the paper argues that ‘countries of origin’ limit the right to exit in collaboration with possible countries of destination. They do so by making different multilateral and bilateral agreements, which promise countries of origin a sort of reward (like visa-free travel for majority citizens), while countries of destination use it as a ‘remote control’ to prevent access to their territory to unwanted migrants. The paper discusses the following examples: first, the case of the UK's border officers being stationed at the Prague airport, disproportionately not allowing Roma to board flights to the UK. Second, it discusses the incentives France used to discourage Romani EU citizens from leaving Romania and Bulgaria towards France. Third, it investigates European Parliament restrictions on the visa-free regime, should there be a greater number of Romani asylum seekers from non-EU former Yugoslav countries. And fourth, the impediments Romani refugees faced when trying to exit Ukraine after the full-scale Russian invasion.

Abstract Image

不断变化的种族化边界和欧洲内部的退出权
本文研究了欧洲国家如何限制和控制被消极种族化的少数民族,特别是罗姆人的出境权。基于对四个案例研究的社会法律分析,本文认为“原籍国”限制了与可能的目的地国合作的出境权利。他们通过签订不同的多边和双边协议来做到这一点,这些协议向原籍国承诺一种奖励(比如大多数公民免签证旅行),而目的地国则将其作为“远程控制”,防止不受欢迎的移民进入他们的领土。本文讨论了以下例子:首先,英国边境官员驻扎在布拉格机场,不成比例地不允许罗姆人登上飞往英国的航班。其次,它讨论了法国用来阻止罗姆裔欧盟公民离开罗马尼亚和保加利亚前往法国的激励措施。第三,它调查了欧洲议会对免签证制度的限制,以防有更多来自非欧盟前南斯拉夫国家的罗姆人寻求庇护。第四,在俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰后,罗姆难民试图离开乌克兰时面临的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: International Migration is a refereed, policy oriented journal on migration issues as analysed by demographers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists from all parts of the world. It covers the entire field of policy relevance in international migration, giving attention not only to a breadth of topics reflective of policy concerns, but also attention to coverage of all regions of the world and to comparative policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信