Analyzing Synthetic Stage-Discharge Rating Curves and Riverine Flood Inundation Maps Derived From Global-Scale Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Joseph L. Gutenson, Michael L. Follum, Kathleen A. Staebell, Emily S. Ondich, Mark D. Wahl
{"title":"Analyzing Synthetic Stage-Discharge Rating Curves and Riverine Flood Inundation Maps Derived From Global-Scale Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling","authors":"Joseph L. Gutenson,&nbsp;Michael L. Follum,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Staebell,&nbsp;Emily S. Ondich,&nbsp;Mark D. Wahl","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Synthetic rating curves (SRCs) are often used to translate streamflow forecasts into flood inundation maps. Previous studies have investigated the development and errors in SRCs at local, regional, and continental scales. In this analysis, we used the latest global methodology and datasets to develop SRCs for use in flood inundation map forecasting. Using the Yellowstone River Basin and the 2022 floods that affected the region, we analyzed the error in the SRCs assessment of stage and water surface elevation (WSE). We then investigated the error in flood inundation maps produced using the SRCs. Comparing SRCs to locally derived rating curves from 29 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gages, median error in SRC stage ranged from 0.45 to 0.65 m and SRC error was greatest at higher magnitude streamflows. This error increased to a median of 1.98–2.30 m when converting the stage to a WSE. After using the SRC WSE estimates to create an estimated flood inundation map, the WSE error at observed high-water marks (1.99 m) was nearly proportional to average WSE error at the stream gage locations along the same river reach. Our results provide the first regional assessment of globally derived SRCs that are used in flood inundation mapping.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70135","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synthetic rating curves (SRCs) are often used to translate streamflow forecasts into flood inundation maps. Previous studies have investigated the development and errors in SRCs at local, regional, and continental scales. In this analysis, we used the latest global methodology and datasets to develop SRCs for use in flood inundation map forecasting. Using the Yellowstone River Basin and the 2022 floods that affected the region, we analyzed the error in the SRCs assessment of stage and water surface elevation (WSE). We then investigated the error in flood inundation maps produced using the SRCs. Comparing SRCs to locally derived rating curves from 29 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream gages, median error in SRC stage ranged from 0.45 to 0.65 m and SRC error was greatest at higher magnitude streamflows. This error increased to a median of 1.98–2.30 m when converting the stage to a WSE. After using the SRC WSE estimates to create an estimated flood inundation map, the WSE error at observed high-water marks (1.99 m) was nearly proportional to average WSE error at the stream gage locations along the same river reach. Our results provide the first regional assessment of globally derived SRCs that are used in flood inundation mapping.

Abstract Image

基于全球尺度水文水工模拟的综合级流量曲线和河流洪水淹没图分析
综合等级曲线(src)常用于将流量预报转化为洪水淹没图。以往的研究已经在地方、区域和大陆尺度上探讨了src的发展和错误。在这一分析中,我们使用了最新的全球方法和数据集来开发用于洪水淹没图预测的src。利用黄石河流域和2022年影响该地区的洪水,分析了SRCs评价阶段和水面高程(WSE)的误差。然后,我们研究了使用src生成的洪水淹没图的误差。将SRC与美国地质调查局(USGS) 29个河流测量仪的本地评级曲线进行比较,SRC阶段的中位误差范围为0.45至0.65 m,并且SRC误差在更高量级的河流中最大。当将阶段转换为WSE时,该误差中值增加到1.98-2.30 m。在使用SRC WSE估计值创建估计的洪水淹没图后,观测到的高水位标记(1.99 m)的WSE误差几乎与同一河段的流计位置的平均WSE误差成正比。我们的研究结果首次提供了用于洪水淹没制图的全球衍生src的区域评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信