Adverse Childhood Experiences and Resilience: Racial Differences and Coping Style as a Mediator

IF 2.1
Madisen Hillebrant-Openshaw, Maria Wong
{"title":"Adverse Childhood Experiences and Resilience: Racial Differences and Coping Style as a Mediator","authors":"Madisen Hillebrant-Openshaw,&nbsp;Maria Wong","doi":"10.1007/s42844-024-00153-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are at risk for many negative outcomes such as poor mental and physical health. Previous research suggests that coping styles may explain the relationship between ACEs and these outcomes. Further, Black and White individuals have been shown to cope with stressful events differently. However, we do not fully understand if ACEs differentially predict the use of certain coping styles in these two racial groups, or if certain coping styles can explain why individuals of each racial group are less resilient. The current study aimed to expand the field’s knowledge of the mediating role of coping styles on the relationship between ACEs and resilience. Additionally, we examined whether there are racial differences in the relationships within these mediation models. 548 Black and White participants were recruited for an online short-term longitudinal study via Mechanical Turk. Participants filled out questionnaires measuring ACEs, coping styles, and resilience at two time points, 3 months apart. Avoidant and vigilant coping mediated the relationship between ACEs and resilience such that greater ACEs increased the likelihood of avoidant and vigilant coping, which reduced resilience. Further, White individuals had greater increases in avoidant and vigilant coping with each additional ACE compared to Black individuals, and White participants had a greater reduction in resilience with increases in vigilant coping compared to Black participants. The implications of these findings on prevention and intervention programs for individuals with ACEs are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":"6 3","pages":"221 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42844-024-00153-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-024-00153-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are at risk for many negative outcomes such as poor mental and physical health. Previous research suggests that coping styles may explain the relationship between ACEs and these outcomes. Further, Black and White individuals have been shown to cope with stressful events differently. However, we do not fully understand if ACEs differentially predict the use of certain coping styles in these two racial groups, or if certain coping styles can explain why individuals of each racial group are less resilient. The current study aimed to expand the field’s knowledge of the mediating role of coping styles on the relationship between ACEs and resilience. Additionally, we examined whether there are racial differences in the relationships within these mediation models. 548 Black and White participants were recruited for an online short-term longitudinal study via Mechanical Turk. Participants filled out questionnaires measuring ACEs, coping styles, and resilience at two time points, 3 months apart. Avoidant and vigilant coping mediated the relationship between ACEs and resilience such that greater ACEs increased the likelihood of avoidant and vigilant coping, which reduced resilience. Further, White individuals had greater increases in avoidant and vigilant coping with each additional ACE compared to Black individuals, and White participants had a greater reduction in resilience with increases in vigilant coping compared to Black participants. The implications of these findings on prevention and intervention programs for individuals with ACEs are discussed.

童年不良经历与心理弹性:种族差异与应对方式的中介作用
有不良童年经历(ace)的个人面临许多负面后果的风险,如精神和身体健康状况不佳。先前的研究表明,应对方式可以解释ace与这些结果之间的关系。此外,黑人和白人处理压力事件的方式也不同。然而,我们并不完全了解ace是否在预测这两个种族群体中某些应对方式的使用方面存在差异,或者某些应对方式是否可以解释为什么每个种族群体的个体都缺乏弹性。本研究旨在拓展应对方式在ace与心理韧性关系中的中介作用。此外,我们研究了这些中介模型中的关系是否存在种族差异。通过Mechanical Turk招募了548名黑人和白人参与者进行在线短期纵向研究。参与者填写了问卷,分别在两个时间点(间隔3个月)测量ace、应对方式和恢复力。回避性应对和警惕性应对在ace与心理弹性之间起中介作用,ace越高,回避性应对和警惕性应对的可能性越大,从而降低心理弹性。此外,与黑人相比,白人在每增加一次ACE时,回避性和警惕性应对能力都有更大的增加,而白人在警惕性应对能力的增加时,恢复力的下降幅度比黑人大。这些研究结果对ace患者的预防和干预方案的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书