Exploring Cross-Cultural Resilience: Rasch Rating Scale Analysis of the 10-Item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in an International Sample

IF 2.9
Yun-Ruei Ku, Stefanie A. Wind, Catanya G. Stager, Randall E. Schumacker
{"title":"Exploring Cross-Cultural Resilience: Rasch Rating Scale Analysis of the 10-Item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale in an International Sample","authors":"Yun-Ruei Ku,&nbsp;Stefanie A. Wind,&nbsp;Catanya G. Stager,&nbsp;Randall E. Schumacker","doi":"10.1007/s42844-024-00160-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the psychometric properties of the English version of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale using the Rasch Rating Scale model in a sample of 177 international students and scholars at a U.S. university. The Connor-Davison Resilience Scale was developed to measure individual differences in psychological resilience. Previous studies using item response theory (IRT) approaches to evaluate the scale have not yet considered potential differences in psychometric properties related to participants’ ethnicities and cultures. Thus, this study extended prior investigations by examining possible violations of measurement invariance across participants’ demographic characteristics at the item level using the Rasch rating scale model. Although the CD-RISC-10 demonstrated adequate person separation reliability, visual inspection of individual ratings and the variable map indicates that some participants provided extreme and inconsistent responses. Moreover, the CD-RISC-10 had an apparent ceiling effect, and one item showed differential item functioning across gender groups. Altogether, the results suggest that the English CD-RISC-10 shows adequate psychometric properties within a sample of international participants in the U.S. However, continued research is needed to determine how population differences may affect performance on the instrument and to develop items capable of measuring a broader range of psychological resilience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":"6 3","pages":"193 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-024-00160-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the English version of the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale using the Rasch Rating Scale model in a sample of 177 international students and scholars at a U.S. university. The Connor-Davison Resilience Scale was developed to measure individual differences in psychological resilience. Previous studies using item response theory (IRT) approaches to evaluate the scale have not yet considered potential differences in psychometric properties related to participants’ ethnicities and cultures. Thus, this study extended prior investigations by examining possible violations of measurement invariance across participants’ demographic characteristics at the item level using the Rasch rating scale model. Although the CD-RISC-10 demonstrated adequate person separation reliability, visual inspection of individual ratings and the variable map indicates that some participants provided extreme and inconsistent responses. Moreover, the CD-RISC-10 had an apparent ceiling effect, and one item showed differential item functioning across gender groups. Altogether, the results suggest that the English CD-RISC-10 shows adequate psychometric properties within a sample of international participants in the U.S. However, continued research is needed to determine how population differences may affect performance on the instrument and to develop items capable of measuring a broader range of psychological resilience.

Abstract Image

跨文化心理弹性探索:国际样本中10项康纳-戴维森心理弹性量表的Rasch评定量表分析
本研究以美国一所大学的177名国际学生和学者为样本,采用Rasch评定量表模型,考察了10项康纳-戴维森弹性量表的英文版本的心理测量特性。康诺-戴维森心理弹性量表是为了测量心理弹性的个体差异而开发的。先前使用项目反应理论(IRT)方法评估量表的研究尚未考虑与参与者种族和文化相关的心理测量属性的潜在差异。因此,本研究通过使用Rasch评定量表模型在项目水平上检查参与者人口统计学特征中可能违反测量不变性的行为,扩展了先前的调查。虽然CD-RISC-10表现出足够的人分离可靠性,但对个人评级和变量图的目视检查表明,一些参与者提供了极端和不一致的反应。此外,CD-RISC-10具有明显的天花板效应,其中一个项目在性别群体中表现出不同的项目功能。总之,结果表明,英语CD-RISC-10在美国的国际参与者样本中显示出足够的心理测量特性。然而,需要继续研究以确定人口差异如何影响仪器的表现,并开发能够测量更广泛心理弹性的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信