Giovanni Ermanis , Yan Tereshko , Enrico Belgrado , Christian Lettieri , Gian Luigi Gigli , Mariarosaria Valente
{"title":"Botulinum toxin as an effective rescue treatment after failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine patients","authors":"Giovanni Ermanis , Yan Tereshko , Enrico Belgrado , Christian Lettieri , Gian Luigi Gigli , Mariarosaria Valente","doi":"10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) represent a highly effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraineurs, but for some subjects they are ineffective. We aimed to determine if OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT/A) treatment may be helpful in these cases. We collected data from fourteen chronic migraineurs who attended our Headache Center and who did not benefit from anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. After anti-CGRP mAbs failure, these patients underwent at least one BoNT/A treatment according to the PREEMPT protocol. We then compared the variation in headache days (DOH), pain intensity (NRS), and symptomatic medication intake (ADI) before and after anti-CGRP mAbs therapy and before and after BoNT/A treatment: we confirmed that the interruption of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment had actually been due to a lack of benefit in terms of DOH (19.21 ± 7.58 days and 20.29 ± 8.32 days; p = 0.74), NRS (7.64 ± 0.75 vs 7.57 ± 1.01; p = 0.85) and ADI (42.86 ± 52.74 vs 45.64 ± 52.82; p = 0.79). All patients started BoNT/A therapy after discontinuing anti-CGRP mAbs. After a period without treatment, therapy with BoNT/A caused a significant reduction in DOH (23.86 ± 6.97 vs. 11.36 ± 10.10, p = 0.010), ADI (47.07 ± 51.19 vs. 20.50 ± 21.42, p = 0.010) and NRS (8.07 ± 1.00 vs. 6.64 ± 1.60, p = 0.014), improving clinical conditions in patients non-responders to anti-CGRP mAbs. It is not well established on which basis pharmacological resistance to anti-CGRP mAbs develops in such refractory patients. Still, these data may point towards a mechanism of pain relief that could not be solely related to CGRP pathways activity, thus being a good rescue therapy in resistant headache management, although further data are needed. Our preliminary results suggest that BoNT/A may be a promising salvage therapy option when anti-CGRP mAbs are ineffective, but evidence requires confirmation from basic research and in larger, uncontrolled, prospective studies in chronic migraineurs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23289,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 108605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010125003800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) represent a highly effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraineurs, but for some subjects they are ineffective. We aimed to determine if OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT/A) treatment may be helpful in these cases. We collected data from fourteen chronic migraineurs who attended our Headache Center and who did not benefit from anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. After anti-CGRP mAbs failure, these patients underwent at least one BoNT/A treatment according to the PREEMPT protocol. We then compared the variation in headache days (DOH), pain intensity (NRS), and symptomatic medication intake (ADI) before and after anti-CGRP mAbs therapy and before and after BoNT/A treatment: we confirmed that the interruption of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment had actually been due to a lack of benefit in terms of DOH (19.21 ± 7.58 days and 20.29 ± 8.32 days; p = 0.74), NRS (7.64 ± 0.75 vs 7.57 ± 1.01; p = 0.85) and ADI (42.86 ± 52.74 vs 45.64 ± 52.82; p = 0.79). All patients started BoNT/A therapy after discontinuing anti-CGRP mAbs. After a period without treatment, therapy with BoNT/A caused a significant reduction in DOH (23.86 ± 6.97 vs. 11.36 ± 10.10, p = 0.010), ADI (47.07 ± 51.19 vs. 20.50 ± 21.42, p = 0.010) and NRS (8.07 ± 1.00 vs. 6.64 ± 1.60, p = 0.014), improving clinical conditions in patients non-responders to anti-CGRP mAbs. It is not well established on which basis pharmacological resistance to anti-CGRP mAbs develops in such refractory patients. Still, these data may point towards a mechanism of pain relief that could not be solely related to CGRP pathways activity, thus being a good rescue therapy in resistant headache management, although further data are needed. Our preliminary results suggest that BoNT/A may be a promising salvage therapy option when anti-CGRP mAbs are ineffective, but evidence requires confirmation from basic research and in larger, uncontrolled, prospective studies in chronic migraineurs.
期刊介绍:
Toxicon has an open access mirror Toxicon: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. An introductory offer Toxicon: X - full waiver of the Open Access fee.
Toxicon''s "aims and scope" are to publish:
-articles containing the results of original research on problems related to toxins derived from animals, plants and microorganisms
-papers on novel findings related to the chemical, pharmacological, toxicological, and immunological properties of natural toxins
-molecular biological studies of toxins and other genes from poisonous and venomous organisms that advance understanding of the role or function of toxins
-clinical observations on poisoning and envenoming where a new therapeutic principle has been proposed or a decidedly superior clinical result has been obtained.
-material on the use of toxins as tools in studying biological processes and material on subjects related to venom and antivenom problems.
-articles on the translational application of toxins, for example as drugs and insecticides
-epidemiological studies on envenoming or poisoning, so long as they highlight a previously unrecognised medical problem or provide insight into the prevention or medical treatment of envenoming or poisoning. Retrospective surveys of hospital records, especially those lacking species identification, will not be considered for publication. Properly designed prospective community-based surveys are strongly encouraged.
-articles describing well-known activities of venoms, such as antibacterial, anticancer, and analgesic activities of arachnid venoms, without any attempt to define the mechanism of action or purify the active component, will not be considered for publication in Toxicon.
-review articles on problems related to toxinology.
To encourage the exchange of ideas, sections of the journal may be devoted to Short Communications, Letters to the Editor and activities of the affiliated societies.