Vaccine acceptance and refusal in Western and Central and Eastern European countries: An analysis based on the European Social Survey data from 23 countries, using a classification and regression tree

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Michał Wróblewski , Andrzej Meler
{"title":"Vaccine acceptance and refusal in Western and Central and Eastern European countries: An analysis based on the European Social Survey data from 23 countries, using a classification and regression tree","authors":"Michał Wróblewski ,&nbsp;Andrzej Meler","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to explore the socio-political and demographic determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and refusal across Western and Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. While most existing studies treat vaccine hesitancy as a universal phenomenon, our analysis emphasises the role of national and regional contexts. Using data from the 11th round of the European Social Survey (2023–2024), covering 23 European countries and 39,184 respondents, we applied a Classification and Regression Tree model to identify key predictors of vaccination status.</div><div>The dependent variable was defined as receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine approved by national regulatory authorities. Independent variables included institutional and social trust, political attitudes, voting behaviour, attitudes toward minorities, and socio-demographics. The Classification and Regression Tree model enabled non-parametric analysis of complex and nonlinear relationships and allowed segmentation of respondents based on context-specific predictors.</div><div>Our findings demonstrate significant regional differences. In Western Europe, vaccine acceptance was strongly associated with voting for non-populist parties and with high institutional trust, suggesting that vaccination is perceived as not only a public health measure but also a civic responsibility. In contrast, in CEE countries, vaccine acceptance was primarily shaped by age and education level, with younger and less educated individuals showing greater refusal. Institutional trust remained a key predictor in both regions. The model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 85.3 %.</div><div>We argue that the difference between Western Europe and CEE is related to different political circumstances during the pandemic. In Western Europe, populist parties critical of restrictions and vaccination programs were often in opposition. In CEE countries, however, populist parties were mostly in power and managed the health crisis (by introducing restrictions and organizing mass vaccination programs).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 127807"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25011041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the socio-political and demographic determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and refusal across Western and Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. While most existing studies treat vaccine hesitancy as a universal phenomenon, our analysis emphasises the role of national and regional contexts. Using data from the 11th round of the European Social Survey (2023–2024), covering 23 European countries and 39,184 respondents, we applied a Classification and Regression Tree model to identify key predictors of vaccination status.
The dependent variable was defined as receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine approved by national regulatory authorities. Independent variables included institutional and social trust, political attitudes, voting behaviour, attitudes toward minorities, and socio-demographics. The Classification and Regression Tree model enabled non-parametric analysis of complex and nonlinear relationships and allowed segmentation of respondents based on context-specific predictors.
Our findings demonstrate significant regional differences. In Western Europe, vaccine acceptance was strongly associated with voting for non-populist parties and with high institutional trust, suggesting that vaccination is perceived as not only a public health measure but also a civic responsibility. In contrast, in CEE countries, vaccine acceptance was primarily shaped by age and education level, with younger and less educated individuals showing greater refusal. Institutional trust remained a key predictor in both regions. The model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 85.3 %.
We argue that the difference between Western Europe and CEE is related to different political circumstances during the pandemic. In Western Europe, populist parties critical of restrictions and vaccination programs were often in opposition. In CEE countries, however, populist parties were mostly in power and managed the health crisis (by introducing restrictions and organizing mass vaccination programs).
西欧、中欧和东欧国家的疫苗接受和拒绝:基于23个国家的欧洲社会调查数据的分析,使用分类和回归树
本研究旨在探讨西欧、中欧和东欧(CEE)国家COVID-19疫苗接受和拒绝的社会政治和人口决定因素。虽然大多数现有研究将疫苗犹豫视为一种普遍现象,但我们的分析强调了国家和区域背景的作用。利用第11轮欧洲社会调查(2023-2024)的数据,涵盖23个欧洲国家和39184名受访者,我们应用分类和回归树模型来确定疫苗接种状况的关键预测因素。因变量定义为接受至少一剂国家监管机构批准的COVID-19疫苗。独立变量包括制度和社会信任、政治态度、投票行为、对少数民族的态度和社会人口统计学。分类和回归树模型能够对复杂和非线性关系进行非参数分析,并允许基于特定于上下文的预测因子对受访者进行分割。我们的研究结果显示了显著的地区差异。在西欧,接受疫苗与投票给非民粹主义政党和机构信任度高密切相关,这表明疫苗接种不仅被视为一项公共卫生措施,而且被视为一项公民责任。相比之下,在中东欧国家,疫苗接受程度主要受年龄和教育水平的影响,年轻人和受教育程度较低的人更拒绝接种。机构信任仍然是这两个地区的关键预测指标。该模型的总体分类准确率为85.3%。我们认为,西欧和中东欧之间的差异与疫情期间不同的政治环境有关。在西欧,批评限制和疫苗接种计划的民粹主义政党经常处于反对地位。然而,在中东欧国家,民粹主义政党大多掌权,并管理了卫生危机(通过引入限制和组织大规模疫苗接种计划)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信