Wealth, digital overuse, and the changing landscape of digital inequality

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Soyoung Park
{"title":"Wealth, digital overuse, and the changing landscape of digital inequality","authors":"Soyoung Park","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wealth has long influenced digital inequality by shaping access to and benefits from technologies, yet its role in digital overuse—characterized by perceived dissatisfaction and negative consequences rather than mere screen time—remains underexplored. This study investigates the relationship between income and digital overuse, using data from the 2019–2022 Korean Smartphone Overuse Survey, with 101,625 respondents. Digital overuse is both defined and assessed in terms of self-control failure, behavioral salience, and negative after-effects, analyzed using quantile regression across income percentiles. This study examines whether the unintended consequences of digital engagement, like overuse, are also stratified along socioeconomic lines—just as the benefits of technology have been. To explore this, we test two hypotheses in the context of COVID-19: the Affluence Dependency Hypothesis, which suggests that affluent individuals are more prone to digital overuse due to greater access, and the Resourceful Autonomy Hypothesis, which posits that higher-income individuals are better able to regulate their usage. Results indicate that while affluent individuals exhibited higher overuse during the pandemic, this effect diminished by 2022, suggesting a recovery of control. By extending the discussion of digital inequality beyond access and benefits to include overuse, this study expands the landscape of digital inequalities, revealing a new form of stratification in which economic resources shape not only digital advantages but also the ability to mitigate digital risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 108805"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wealth has long influenced digital inequality by shaping access to and benefits from technologies, yet its role in digital overuse—characterized by perceived dissatisfaction and negative consequences rather than mere screen time—remains underexplored. This study investigates the relationship between income and digital overuse, using data from the 2019–2022 Korean Smartphone Overuse Survey, with 101,625 respondents. Digital overuse is both defined and assessed in terms of self-control failure, behavioral salience, and negative after-effects, analyzed using quantile regression across income percentiles. This study examines whether the unintended consequences of digital engagement, like overuse, are also stratified along socioeconomic lines—just as the benefits of technology have been. To explore this, we test two hypotheses in the context of COVID-19: the Affluence Dependency Hypothesis, which suggests that affluent individuals are more prone to digital overuse due to greater access, and the Resourceful Autonomy Hypothesis, which posits that higher-income individuals are better able to regulate their usage. Results indicate that while affluent individuals exhibited higher overuse during the pandemic, this effect diminished by 2022, suggesting a recovery of control. By extending the discussion of digital inequality beyond access and benefits to include overuse, this study expands the landscape of digital inequalities, revealing a new form of stratification in which economic resources shape not only digital advantages but also the ability to mitigate digital risks.
财富、数字设备的过度使用,以及不断变化的数字不平等现象
长期以来,财富通过影响技术的获取和受益,影响着数字不平等,但它在数字过度使用中的作用——其特征是感知到的不满和负面后果,而不仅仅是屏幕时间——仍未得到充分探讨。这项研究调查了收入与数字过度使用之间的关系,使用了2019-2022年韩国智能手机过度使用调查的数据,共有101625名受访者。数字过度使用的定义和评估是根据自我控制失败、行为突出和负面后果来进行的,并使用跨收入百分位数的分位数回归进行分析。这项研究考察了数字参与的意外后果,比如过度使用,是否也像技术的好处一样,按照社会经济线分层。为了探讨这一点,我们在COVID-19的背景下测试了两个假设:富裕依赖假设,这表明富裕的个人更容易过度使用数字产品,因为更多的访问,以及资源自治假设,这假设高收入的个人能够更好地调节他们的使用。结果表明,虽然富裕的个人在大流行期间表现出更高的过度使用,但这种影响到2022年减弱,表明控制权的恢复。通过将对数字不平等的讨论从获取和收益扩展到过度使用,本研究扩大了数字不平等的格局,揭示了一种新的分层形式,在这种分层形式中,经济资源不仅塑造了数字优势,还塑造了减轻数字风险的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信