Integration of resilience-based community physical infrastructure system performance and community performance correlation relationships

IF 12 1区工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY

Sustainable Cities and Society Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106862

Juan Zhang , Pingyuan Liu , Ming Lei , Guofeng Du , Mingyuan Zhang

{"title":"Integration of resilience-based community physical infrastructure system performance and community performance correlation relationships","authors":"Juan Zhang , Pingyuan Liu , Ming Lei , Guofeng Du , Mingyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the basic units of cities, resilient communities are essential to building resilient and sustainable cities. Community resilience is inextricably linked to subsystems (i.e., buildings, physical infrastructures), so the relationship between them has consistently been a focal point of research. Therefore, this paper introduced a novel method for establishing a relationship between community performance goals (CPG) and community subsystem performance goals (CSPG). Firstly, a community performance assessment framework and model were established from the technical dimension. Then, the community initial performance (CIPG) considering earthquake disaster was set through selecting appropriate parameters. Subsequently, the CPG was decomposed into the community vital function performance goals (CVFPG) through the event tree method, and then the CSPGs were derived similarly. Finally, the proposed method was used in a community in Dalian, China. Then, the CVFPGs and CSPGs were obtained using the proposed method. The result showed that to satisfy the CPG, the CSPGs must be superior to the CPG, and demonstrated the feasibility of decomposing CPGs to obtain CSPGs. The proposed framework can effectively establish the connection between the CPGs and the CSPGs, and can be decomposed to obtain the CSPGs. The method proposed in this paper can link CPGs with the design norms and standards of subsystems while providing relevant designers with a technical approach to adjust the performance goals at the component, system, and community levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 106862"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725007358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the basic units of cities, resilient communities are essential to building resilient and sustainable cities. Community resilience is inextricably linked to subsystems (i.e., buildings, physical infrastructures), so the relationship between them has consistently been a focal point of research. Therefore, this paper introduced a novel method for establishing a relationship between community performance goals (CPG) and community subsystem performance goals (CSPG). Firstly, a community performance assessment framework and model were established from the technical dimension. Then, the community initial performance (CIPG) considering earthquake disaster was set through selecting appropriate parameters. Subsequently, the CPG was decomposed into the community vital function performance goals (CVFPG) through the event tree method, and then the CSPGs were derived similarly. Finally, the proposed method was used in a community in Dalian, China. Then, the CVFPGs and CSPGs were obtained using the proposed method. The result showed that to satisfy the CPG, the CSPGs must be superior to the CPG, and demonstrated the feasibility of decomposing CPGs to obtain CSPGs. The proposed framework can effectively establish the connection between the CPGs and the CSPGs, and can be decomposed to obtain the CSPGs. The method proposed in this paper can link CPGs with the design norms and standards of subsystems while providing relevant designers with a technical approach to adjust the performance goals at the component, system, and community levels.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于弹性的社区物理基础设施系统绩效与社区绩效相关关系的整合

韧性社区作为城市的基本单元，对于建设有韧性和可持续发展的城市至关重要。社区恢复力与子系统（即建筑物、物理基础设施）密不可分，因此它们之间的关系一直是研究的焦点。为此，本文提出了一种建立社区绩效目标（CPG）和社区子系统绩效目标（CSPG）之间关系的新方法。首先，从技术维度构建社区绩效评估框架和模型；然后，通过选择合适的参数，设定考虑地震灾害的社区初始绩效（CIPG）。然后，通过事件树方法将CPG分解为社区重要功能性能目标（CVFPG），进而导出社区重要功能性能目标。最后，以大连市某社区为例进行了研究。然后，利用该方法得到了cvfpga和CSPGs。结果表明，要满足CPG， cspg必须优于CPG，并证明了分解CPG获得cspg的可行性。该框架可以有效地建立cpg和cspg之间的联系，并可以分解得到cspg。本文提出的方法可以将cpg与子系统的设计规范和标准联系起来，同时为相关设计人员提供在组件、系统和社区层面调整性能目标的技术途径。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development

CiteScore

22.00

自引率

13.70%

发文量

810

审稿时长

27 days

期刊介绍： Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;