Safety and efficacy of transcranial ultrasound stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

IF 4.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Jong-Ling Fuh , Shuu-Jiun Wang , Pei-Ning Wang , Hsiu-Mei Wu , Wei-Shen Su , Hsin-Mei Lin , Feng-Yi Yang
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of transcranial ultrasound stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial","authors":"Jong-Ling Fuh ,&nbsp;Shuu-Jiun Wang ,&nbsp;Pei-Ning Wang ,&nbsp;Hsiu-Mei Wu ,&nbsp;Wei-Shen Su ,&nbsp;Hsin-Mei Lin ,&nbsp;Feng-Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) has emerged as a potential neuromodulatory intervention for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated TUS’s safety and preliminary efficacy in patients with mild AD. Patients aged 50–90 years were enrolled and randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive TUS treatment for 30 sessions (15 min/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks) or a placebo procedure. Safety was monitored through magnetic resonance imaging, adverse event reporting, and laboratory assessments. Efficacy was assessed with the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Nine of 30 patients screened were enrolled (six TUS, three placebo). All patients completed the study, and no serious clinical or radiographic adverse events related to TUS were observed. At 52 weeks, the change in ADAS-cog score from baseline remained relatively stable in the TUS group compared to worsening in the placebo group (0.5 ± 4.7 vs. 5.0 ± 4.0, p = 0.237), particularly in the memory domain. The change in MMSE score from baseline showed a significant benefit in the TUS group at 24 weeks compared to placebo (2.2 ± 2.2 vs. −3.0 ± 2.6, p &lt; 0.05), and this improvement persisted to 52 weeks. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of repeated TUS sessions in AD and suggests potential benefits in preserving cognitive function. Larger, adequately powered trials are required to validate these preliminary findings and further define the therapeutic potential of TUS in AD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23522,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasonics","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 107844"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041624X25002811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) has emerged as a potential neuromodulatory intervention for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated TUS’s safety and preliminary efficacy in patients with mild AD. Patients aged 50–90 years were enrolled and randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive TUS treatment for 30 sessions (15 min/day, 5 days/week for 6 weeks) or a placebo procedure. Safety was monitored through magnetic resonance imaging, adverse event reporting, and laboratory assessments. Efficacy was assessed with the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Nine of 30 patients screened were enrolled (six TUS, three placebo). All patients completed the study, and no serious clinical or radiographic adverse events related to TUS were observed. At 52 weeks, the change in ADAS-cog score from baseline remained relatively stable in the TUS group compared to worsening in the placebo group (0.5 ± 4.7 vs. 5.0 ± 4.0, p = 0.237), particularly in the memory domain. The change in MMSE score from baseline showed a significant benefit in the TUS group at 24 weeks compared to placebo (2.2 ± 2.2 vs. −3.0 ± 2.6, p < 0.05), and this improvement persisted to 52 weeks. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of repeated TUS sessions in AD and suggests potential benefits in preserving cognitive function. Larger, adequately powered trials are required to validate these preliminary findings and further define the therapeutic potential of TUS in AD.
经颅超声刺激治疗阿尔茨海默病的安全性和有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
经颅超声刺激(TUS)已成为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的潜在神经调节干预手段。这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验评估了TUS在轻度AD患者中的安全性和初步疗效。年龄50-90岁的患者被纳入研究,并按2:1的比例随机分配,接受30次TUS治疗(15分钟/天,每周5天,持续6周)或安慰剂治疗。通过磁共振成像、不良事件报告和实验室评估来监测安全性。采用阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-cog)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评估疗效。筛选的30名患者中有9名入组(6名服用安慰剂,3名服用安慰剂)。所有患者均完成了研究,未观察到与TUS相关的严重临床或影像学不良事件。在52周时,与安慰剂组相比,TUS组的ADAS-cog评分相对于基线的变化保持相对稳定(0.5±4.7 vs 5.0±4.0,p = 0.237),特别是在记忆领域。在24周时,与安慰剂组相比,TUS组MMSE评分从基线的变化显示出显著的益处(2.2±2.2 vs - 3.0±2.6,p < 0.05),并且这种改善持续到52周。该研究证明了AD患者反复进行TUS治疗的安全性和可行性,并提示了在保持认知功能方面的潜在益处。需要更大规模、更有力的试验来验证这些初步发现,并进一步确定TUS在AD中的治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasonics is the only internationally established journal which covers the entire field of ultrasound research and technology and all its many applications. Ultrasonics contains a variety of sections to keep readers fully informed and up-to-date on the whole spectrum of research and development throughout the world. Ultrasonics publishes papers of exceptional quality and of relevance to both academia and industry. Manuscripts in which ultrasonics is a central issue and not simply an incidental tool or minor issue, are welcomed. As well as top quality original research papers and review articles by world renowned experts, Ultrasonics also regularly features short communications, a calendar of forthcoming events and special issues dedicated to topical subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信