Alex Bersani , Saulo Martelli , Maxence Lavaill , Giorgio Davico
{"title":"Stochastic modelling of muscle control during shoulder abduction","authors":"Alex Bersani , Saulo Martelli , Maxence Lavaill , Giorgio Davico","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intrinsic variability of the shoulder joint motion is a critical factor in the characterisation of the shoulder joint. However, traditional computational approaches struggle to account for it. On the other hand, the stochastic approach allows to identify a set of plausible solutions. In this study, the Myobolica toolbox, which yielded promising results in the lower limb, was employed to simulate a shoulder abduction, with twofold aims: to assess its generalisability to other joints, and to evaluate an electromyography (EMG)-informed version of Myobolica.</div><div>Publicly available kinematics, EMG, and glenohumeral (GH) joint force data measured by an instrumented implant on a 64-year-old man executing three weighted shoulder abductions were used. A previously developed shoulder musculoskeletal model was employed to compute stochastic simulations informed and not with EMG data, sampling 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> solutions every 30 timeframes. The predicted GH joint force were compared to the experimental data, and the variance in the solutions across simulations was computed.</div><div>Overall, the correlation between the GH joint force predicted by Myobolica and the experimental values increased when the EMG-based constraint was applied (from approximately R<sup>2</sup> = 0.06, RMSE = 1.82 BW to R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6, RMSE = 0.73 BW when all available EMG data were employed). Using EMG led to a reduction (from 2.3 to 0.65 BW) in the solution bandwidths.</div><div>Providing EMG data to inform the simulations helped improve their accuracy. However, the results obtained otherwise remain promising. Additional work is required to minimize the computational cost of the Myobolica approach. A consistency gap between experimental data and the model is reported.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112993"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025005056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The intrinsic variability of the shoulder joint motion is a critical factor in the characterisation of the shoulder joint. However, traditional computational approaches struggle to account for it. On the other hand, the stochastic approach allows to identify a set of plausible solutions. In this study, the Myobolica toolbox, which yielded promising results in the lower limb, was employed to simulate a shoulder abduction, with twofold aims: to assess its generalisability to other joints, and to evaluate an electromyography (EMG)-informed version of Myobolica.
Publicly available kinematics, EMG, and glenohumeral (GH) joint force data measured by an instrumented implant on a 64-year-old man executing three weighted shoulder abductions were used. A previously developed shoulder musculoskeletal model was employed to compute stochastic simulations informed and not with EMG data, sampling 1 × 105 solutions every 30 timeframes. The predicted GH joint force were compared to the experimental data, and the variance in the solutions across simulations was computed.
Overall, the correlation between the GH joint force predicted by Myobolica and the experimental values increased when the EMG-based constraint was applied (from approximately R2 = 0.06, RMSE = 1.82 BW to R2 = 0.6, RMSE = 0.73 BW when all available EMG data were employed). Using EMG led to a reduction (from 2.3 to 0.65 BW) in the solution bandwidths.
Providing EMG data to inform the simulations helped improve their accuracy. However, the results obtained otherwise remain promising. Additional work is required to minimize the computational cost of the Myobolica approach. A consistency gap between experimental data and the model is reported.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.