Beyond expected travel time: Unveiling the role of ergodicity breaking in mobility decisions and effective transportation policy

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Arne Vanhoyweghen , Vincent Ginis , Cathy Macharis
{"title":"Beyond expected travel time: Unveiling the role of ergodicity breaking in mobility decisions and effective transportation policy","authors":"Arne Vanhoyweghen ,&nbsp;Vincent Ginis ,&nbsp;Cathy Macharis","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we direct the attention of the mobility science community to the concept of ergodicity-breaking, a principle of importance for understanding and addressing the complexities of (personal) mobility. Ergodicity refers to the assumption that a system’s evolution over time can be approximated by its ensemble average at one time step: an assumption whose validity has been increasingly put into question. Through a series of thought experiments, we illustrate the non-ergodic properties of travel time. These experiments reveal a new perspective of an old adagio, “People value reliability” more so than transportation speed. We show that this statement does not necessarily stem from heuristics, biases, or idiosyncrasies but rather that it is a consequence of the environment and dynamic in which people make modal choices. Our approach could be a powerful tool for instilling behavioural change. We offer new insights into inducing modal shifts and improving urban mobility systems. Thanks to this shift in perspective, the analytical frameworks used in mobility science could also include non-ergodic dynamics, thereby enriching our understanding and approach to creating more effective mobility interventions and policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 101663"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225003422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we direct the attention of the mobility science community to the concept of ergodicity-breaking, a principle of importance for understanding and addressing the complexities of (personal) mobility. Ergodicity refers to the assumption that a system’s evolution over time can be approximated by its ensemble average at one time step: an assumption whose validity has been increasingly put into question. Through a series of thought experiments, we illustrate the non-ergodic properties of travel time. These experiments reveal a new perspective of an old adagio, “People value reliability” more so than transportation speed. We show that this statement does not necessarily stem from heuristics, biases, or idiosyncrasies but rather that it is a consequence of the environment and dynamic in which people make modal choices. Our approach could be a powerful tool for instilling behavioural change. We offer new insights into inducing modal shifts and improving urban mobility systems. Thanks to this shift in perspective, the analytical frameworks used in mobility science could also include non-ergodic dynamics, thereby enriching our understanding and approach to creating more effective mobility interventions and policies.
超出预期的旅行时间:揭示遍历性打破在交通决策和有效交通政策中的作用
在本文中,我们将流动性科学界的注意力引向遍历性打破的概念,这是理解和解决(个人)流动性复杂性的重要原则。遍历性指的是一个假设,即系统随时间的演化可以用它在一个时间步长的总平均值来近似:这个假设的有效性越来越受到质疑。通过一系列的思想实验,我们说明了旅行时间的非遍历性质。这些实验揭示了一个古老的慢板的新视角,“人们更看重可靠性”而不是运输速度。我们表明,这种说法不一定源于启发式、偏见或特质,而是人们做出模态选择的环境和动态的结果。我们的方法可以成为灌输行为改变的有力工具。我们为诱导模式转变和改善城市交通系统提供了新的见解。由于这种观点的转变,流动性科学中使用的分析框架也可以包括非遍历动力学,从而丰富我们的理解和方法,以制定更有效的流动性干预措施和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信