Beyond the dichotomy of use and Not-Use: Forms and motivations of user non-use behaviors toward AI customer service

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Junchen Yao , Dongqi Yan , Hongzhong Zhang
{"title":"Beyond the dichotomy of use and Not-Use: Forms and motivations of user non-use behaviors toward AI customer service","authors":"Junchen Yao ,&nbsp;Dongqi Yan ,&nbsp;Hongzhong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the era of artificial intelligence, the dichotomy of acceptance versus abandonment falls short in capturing the complexities of user behavior. This study focuses on AI customer service (AICS)—a pervasive but difficult-to-abandon AI application—to explore how users’ perceptions shape diverse non-use behaviors. Through a sequential mixed-methods design, we develop and test an extended Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM). Qualitative findings first reveal that users evaluate AICS through functional and emotional dimensions, and engage in two forms of non-use behavior: active (e.g., self-education, seeking help) and passive (e.g., teasing, verbal abuse). Building on these insights, quantitative results show that both functional and emotional performance perceptions significantly predict satisfaction. Crucially, cognitive satisfaction negatively predicts passive non-use, whereas emotional satisfaction positively predicts active non-use—a finding that challenges conventional models where satisfaction predicts continuance. Moreover, expectation confirmation significantly moderates the relationship between performance perception and satisfaction. Our research extends ECM by introducing a dual-pathway model of non-use and offers managers and designers nuanced insights for improving human-AI coexistence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 108793"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563225002407","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of artificial intelligence, the dichotomy of acceptance versus abandonment falls short in capturing the complexities of user behavior. This study focuses on AI customer service (AICS)—a pervasive but difficult-to-abandon AI application—to explore how users’ perceptions shape diverse non-use behaviors. Through a sequential mixed-methods design, we develop and test an extended Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM). Qualitative findings first reveal that users evaluate AICS through functional and emotional dimensions, and engage in two forms of non-use behavior: active (e.g., self-education, seeking help) and passive (e.g., teasing, verbal abuse). Building on these insights, quantitative results show that both functional and emotional performance perceptions significantly predict satisfaction. Crucially, cognitive satisfaction negatively predicts passive non-use, whereas emotional satisfaction positively predicts active non-use—a finding that challenges conventional models where satisfaction predicts continuance. Moreover, expectation confirmation significantly moderates the relationship between performance perception and satisfaction. Our research extends ECM by introducing a dual-pathway model of non-use and offers managers and designers nuanced insights for improving human-AI coexistence.
超越使用和不使用的二分法:用户对人工智能客户服务的不使用行为的形式和动机
在人工智能时代,接受与放弃的二分法不足以捕捉用户行为的复杂性。本研究的重点是人工智能客户服务(AICS)——一种普遍但难以放弃的人工智能应用——以探索用户的感知如何塑造不同的非使用行为。通过顺序混合方法设计,我们开发并测试了扩展的期望确认模型(ECM)。定性研究结果首先揭示了用户通过功能和情感维度来评估AICS,并参与两种形式的非使用行为:主动(如自我教育、寻求帮助)和被动(如戏弄、言语虐待)。基于这些见解,定量结果表明,功能和情感表现感知都能显著预测满意度。关键是,认知满意度消极地预测被动不使用,而情感满意度积极地预测主动不使用——这一发现挑战了传统模型,即满意度预测持续使用。此外,期望确认显著调节绩效感知与满意度之间的关系。我们的研究通过引入非使用的双路径模型扩展了ECM,并为管理人员和设计师提供了改善人类与人工智能共存的细致见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信