Maciej Stolarski , Wojciech Waleriańczyk , Weronika Mazur , Julia Karbowska , Tomasz Kurach
{"title":"Psychological time matters in sport: Measuring athletes' temporal mindsets with the Sport Time Perspective Questionnaire – Short Form (STPQ-SF)","authors":"Maciej Stolarski , Wojciech Waleriańczyk , Weronika Mazur , Julia Karbowska , Tomasz Kurach","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Athletes' tendencies to frame their experiences within specific time horizons can shape both psychological functioning and sport performance. Using data from three independent samples and applying an Ant Colony Optimization meta-heuristic, we developed the Short Form of the Sport Time Perspective Questionnaire (STPQ-SF) - a domain-specific measure of sport-related time perspectives. The instrument comprises 35 items across seven subscales: Past-Negative, Past-Positive, Present-Hedonistic, Present-Fatalistic, Present-Eudaimonic, Future-Positive, and Future-Negative. Its factor structure and subscale internal consistencies were established in a sample of 681 athletes and replicated in two further samples totaling 599 athletes. To evaluate validity, we examined the STPQ-SF's nomological network, focusing on sport-relevant constructs (performance, burnout, engagement) and individual differences (personality traits, perfectionism). Observed associations aligned with theoretical predictions, supporting the instrument's validity. The patterns linking time perspectives with psychological functioning offer empirical backing for key propositions of the conceptual model of time perspectives in sport. The STPQ-SF (in Polish: <span><span>https://osf.io/2uqj4</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> and in English: <span><span>https://osf.io/ckfse</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) is publicly available for research purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 113486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Athletes' tendencies to frame their experiences within specific time horizons can shape both psychological functioning and sport performance. Using data from three independent samples and applying an Ant Colony Optimization meta-heuristic, we developed the Short Form of the Sport Time Perspective Questionnaire (STPQ-SF) - a domain-specific measure of sport-related time perspectives. The instrument comprises 35 items across seven subscales: Past-Negative, Past-Positive, Present-Hedonistic, Present-Fatalistic, Present-Eudaimonic, Future-Positive, and Future-Negative. Its factor structure and subscale internal consistencies were established in a sample of 681 athletes and replicated in two further samples totaling 599 athletes. To evaluate validity, we examined the STPQ-SF's nomological network, focusing on sport-relevant constructs (performance, burnout, engagement) and individual differences (personality traits, perfectionism). Observed associations aligned with theoretical predictions, supporting the instrument's validity. The patterns linking time perspectives with psychological functioning offer empirical backing for key propositions of the conceptual model of time perspectives in sport. The STPQ-SF (in Polish: https://osf.io/2uqj4 and in English: https://osf.io/ckfse) is publicly available for research purposes.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.