The adaptable community resilience assessment framework for small islands and coastal communities (SICC): A scoping review

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Mohammad Ridwan Lessy , Jonatan Lassa , Kerstin K. Zander
{"title":"The adaptable community resilience assessment framework for small islands and coastal communities (SICC): A scoping review","authors":"Mohammad Ridwan Lessy ,&nbsp;Jonatan Lassa ,&nbsp;Kerstin K. Zander","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Being geographically isolated, physically exposed, under resource constraints, and lacking sovereignty makes small island communities more vulnerable to climate change and disasters than mainland regions. Regrettably, there is a lack of research on what could be the responsive model or framework to assess risk and resilience in small island and coastal communities (SICC). Using a scoping review strategy, this article examined thirty-five peer-reviewed articles published during 2000–2024 to identify gaps in the existing frameworks for assessing resilience. Established practice indicates that, First, most assessment frameworks are continentally biased as they are developed to identify risk inland on the mainland. Second, coastal vulnerability assessment tools are often tweaked and used by SICC specialists to examine small islands' risk and resilience. Third, various dimensions, variables, and indicators can be used to analyse the small island community's resilience, which can be adjusted to the physical, socio-economic, institutions and governance as well as environmental characteristics of each island. The overall findings suggest that the development of community resilience assessment tools is useful for understanding and reducing risk, vulnerability, and ensuring sustainable development for coastal and small island communities. Moreover, SICC resilience assessment research requires consideration of non-traditional variables, including new type of climate risks, community's agency, social capital, island sovereignty, and stakeholders' participation to ensure continuity and consistency in building small islands' resilience. Further enhancements are required to account for spatial and temporal dynamics when constructing the resilience of small island communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 107949"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125004120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Being geographically isolated, physically exposed, under resource constraints, and lacking sovereignty makes small island communities more vulnerable to climate change and disasters than mainland regions. Regrettably, there is a lack of research on what could be the responsive model or framework to assess risk and resilience in small island and coastal communities (SICC). Using a scoping review strategy, this article examined thirty-five peer-reviewed articles published during 2000–2024 to identify gaps in the existing frameworks for assessing resilience. Established practice indicates that, First, most assessment frameworks are continentally biased as they are developed to identify risk inland on the mainland. Second, coastal vulnerability assessment tools are often tweaked and used by SICC specialists to examine small islands' risk and resilience. Third, various dimensions, variables, and indicators can be used to analyse the small island community's resilience, which can be adjusted to the physical, socio-economic, institutions and governance as well as environmental characteristics of each island. The overall findings suggest that the development of community resilience assessment tools is useful for understanding and reducing risk, vulnerability, and ensuring sustainable development for coastal and small island communities. Moreover, SICC resilience assessment research requires consideration of non-traditional variables, including new type of climate risks, community's agency, social capital, island sovereignty, and stakeholders' participation to ensure continuity and consistency in building small islands' resilience. Further enhancements are required to account for spatial and temporal dynamics when constructing the resilience of small island communities.
小岛屿和沿海社区适应性社区恢复力评估框架:范围审查
小岛屿社区在地理上孤立、自然暴露、资源限制和缺乏主权,使其比大陆地区更容易受到气候变化和灾害的影响。令人遗憾的是,缺乏关于评估小岛屿和沿海社区(SICC)风险和复原力的响应模式或框架的研究。使用范围审查策略,本文检查了2000-2024年间发表的35篇同行评议文章,以确定评估弹性的现有框架中的差距。既定的实践表明,首先,大多数评估框架是有大陆偏见的,因为它们是为了识别大陆内陆的风险而开发的。其次,沿海脆弱性评估工具经常被SICC专家用来检查小岛屿的风险和恢复能力。第三,可以使用各种维度、变量和指标来分析小岛屿社区的复原力,这些复原力可以根据每个岛屿的物质、社会经济、机构和治理以及环境特征进行调整。总体研究结果表明,开发社区恢复力评估工具有助于了解和降低沿海和小岛屿社区的风险、脆弱性,并确保可持续发展。此外,SICC韧性评估研究需要考虑非传统变量,包括新型气候风险、社区机构、社会资本、岛屿主权和利益相关者参与,以确保小岛屿韧性建设的连续性和一致性。在建设小岛屿社区的复原力时,需要进一步加强考虑到空间和时间动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信