A powerless alternative? Citizen participation, private actors, and corporate dominance in the contested rollout of renewable energy communities in Portugal
{"title":"A powerless alternative? Citizen participation, private actors, and corporate dominance in the contested rollout of renewable energy communities in Portugal","authors":"Vera Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent European Union policy developments, particularly the Renewable Energy Directive II (2018), have promoted the decentralization of renewable energy (RE) and introduced legal frameworks for collective organization, such as Renewable Energy Communities (RECs). In Portugal, where community-led initiatives were virtually absent before RED II's partial transposition, the concept of “(renewable) energy community” has recently gained prominence. This article presents the first systematic mapping and preliminary characterization of 160 collective and decentralized RE initiatives reported in Portuguese online media between March 2020 and March 2025. The initiatives are analyzed along four dimensions: implementation site, actors, legal status, and stated goals. The findings highlight the predominance of collective self-consumption projects, largely promoted by private energy and technology companies, and the very limited number of legally recognized RECs. The study shows that the term “renewable energy community” has been widely applied across diverse legal and organizational formats, often by incumbent market actors. This discursive appropriation risks diluting the concept's normative foundations and legitimizing market-led approaches through “community-washing”. While collective self-consumption can provide environmental and social benefits, including lower energy costs and potential contributions to alleviating energy poverty, it often falls short of enabling meaningful democratic participation in RE governance. By documenting these dynamics in Portugal, this article advances international debates on community renewable energy and energy democracy, particularly in under-researched Southern European contexts. It underscores the need to investigate the barriers constraining RECs and to assess whether current trajectories foster a more democratic energy transition or reproduce existing power asymmetries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104360"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent European Union policy developments, particularly the Renewable Energy Directive II (2018), have promoted the decentralization of renewable energy (RE) and introduced legal frameworks for collective organization, such as Renewable Energy Communities (RECs). In Portugal, where community-led initiatives were virtually absent before RED II's partial transposition, the concept of “(renewable) energy community” has recently gained prominence. This article presents the first systematic mapping and preliminary characterization of 160 collective and decentralized RE initiatives reported in Portuguese online media between March 2020 and March 2025. The initiatives are analyzed along four dimensions: implementation site, actors, legal status, and stated goals. The findings highlight the predominance of collective self-consumption projects, largely promoted by private energy and technology companies, and the very limited number of legally recognized RECs. The study shows that the term “renewable energy community” has been widely applied across diverse legal and organizational formats, often by incumbent market actors. This discursive appropriation risks diluting the concept's normative foundations and legitimizing market-led approaches through “community-washing”. While collective self-consumption can provide environmental and social benefits, including lower energy costs and potential contributions to alleviating energy poverty, it often falls short of enabling meaningful democratic participation in RE governance. By documenting these dynamics in Portugal, this article advances international debates on community renewable energy and energy democracy, particularly in under-researched Southern European contexts. It underscores the need to investigate the barriers constraining RECs and to assess whether current trajectories foster a more democratic energy transition or reproduce existing power asymmetries.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.