A powerless alternative? Citizen participation, private actors, and corporate dominance in the contested rollout of renewable energy communities in Portugal

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Vera Ferreira
{"title":"A powerless alternative? Citizen participation, private actors, and corporate dominance in the contested rollout of renewable energy communities in Portugal","authors":"Vera Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent European Union policy developments, particularly the Renewable Energy Directive II (2018), have promoted the decentralization of renewable energy (RE) and introduced legal frameworks for collective organization, such as Renewable Energy Communities (RECs). In Portugal, where community-led initiatives were virtually absent before RED II's partial transposition, the concept of “(renewable) energy community” has recently gained prominence. This article presents the first systematic mapping and preliminary characterization of 160 collective and decentralized RE initiatives reported in Portuguese online media between March 2020 and March 2025. The initiatives are analyzed along four dimensions: implementation site, actors, legal status, and stated goals. The findings highlight the predominance of collective self-consumption projects, largely promoted by private energy and technology companies, and the very limited number of legally recognized RECs. The study shows that the term “renewable energy community” has been widely applied across diverse legal and organizational formats, often by incumbent market actors. This discursive appropriation risks diluting the concept's normative foundations and legitimizing market-led approaches through “community-washing”. While collective self-consumption can provide environmental and social benefits, including lower energy costs and potential contributions to alleviating energy poverty, it often falls short of enabling meaningful democratic participation in RE governance. By documenting these dynamics in Portugal, this article advances international debates on community renewable energy and energy democracy, particularly in under-researched Southern European contexts. It underscores the need to investigate the barriers constraining RECs and to assess whether current trajectories foster a more democratic energy transition or reproduce existing power asymmetries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104360"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625004414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent European Union policy developments, particularly the Renewable Energy Directive II (2018), have promoted the decentralization of renewable energy (RE) and introduced legal frameworks for collective organization, such as Renewable Energy Communities (RECs). In Portugal, where community-led initiatives were virtually absent before RED II's partial transposition, the concept of “(renewable) energy community” has recently gained prominence. This article presents the first systematic mapping and preliminary characterization of 160 collective and decentralized RE initiatives reported in Portuguese online media between March 2020 and March 2025. The initiatives are analyzed along four dimensions: implementation site, actors, legal status, and stated goals. The findings highlight the predominance of collective self-consumption projects, largely promoted by private energy and technology companies, and the very limited number of legally recognized RECs. The study shows that the term “renewable energy community” has been widely applied across diverse legal and organizational formats, often by incumbent market actors. This discursive appropriation risks diluting the concept's normative foundations and legitimizing market-led approaches through “community-washing”. While collective self-consumption can provide environmental and social benefits, including lower energy costs and potential contributions to alleviating energy poverty, it often falls short of enabling meaningful democratic participation in RE governance. By documenting these dynamics in Portugal, this article advances international debates on community renewable energy and energy democracy, particularly in under-researched Southern European contexts. It underscores the need to investigate the barriers constraining RECs and to assess whether current trajectories foster a more democratic energy transition or reproduce existing power asymmetries.
一个无能为力的选择?在葡萄牙可再生能源社区的竞争中,公民参与、私人行为者和企业主导地位
欧盟最近的政策发展,特别是可再生能源指令II(2018年),促进了可再生能源(RE)的分散化,并为可再生能源社区(rec)等集体组织引入了法律框架。在葡萄牙,在RED II部分转换之前,社区主导的倡议实际上是缺席的,“(可再生)能源社区”的概念最近得到了突出。本文首次对葡萄牙在线媒体在2020年3月至2025年3月间报道的160项集体和分散的可再生能源倡议进行了系统的描绘和初步描述。从四个方面对计划进行分析:实施地点、参与者、法律地位和既定目标。调查结果突出了集体自我消费项目的优势,这些项目主要由私营能源和技术公司推动,而法律认可的RECs数量非常有限。该研究表明,“可再生能源社区”一词已被广泛应用于各种法律和组织形式,通常由现有的市场参与者使用。这种话语挪用有可能稀释概念的规范基础,并通过“社区清洗”使市场主导的方法合法化。虽然集体自我消费可以提供环境和社会效益,包括降低能源成本和减轻能源贫困的潜在贡献,但它往往无法实现可再生能源治理中有意义的民主参与。通过记录葡萄牙的这些动态,本文推动了关于社区可再生能源和能源民主的国际辩论,特别是在研究不足的南欧背景下。它强调有必要调查限制RECs的障碍,并评估当前的轨迹是促进更民主的能源转型,还是再现现有的权力不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信