Beyond partisan rhetoric: Institutional constraints and local COVID-19 policies in Brazil

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ivan Filipe Fernandes , Gustavo Andrey de Almeida Lopes Fernandes , Michael Touchton , Brian Libgober
{"title":"Beyond partisan rhetoric: Institutional constraints and local COVID-19 policies in Brazil","authors":"Ivan Filipe Fernandes ,&nbsp;Gustavo Andrey de Almeida Lopes Fernandes ,&nbsp;Michael Touchton ,&nbsp;Brian Libgober","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Political polarization can influence policy responses, particularly during crises. While institutions aim to counterbalance these effects, their capacity to do so under stress remains underexplored. This study examines whether mayoral partisan ideology affected pandemic policymaking in Brazilian municipalities, a highly polarized context with a severe COVID-19 health burden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a regression discontinuity design in 599 closely contested mayoral elections in 2016 to identify causal effects of partisan ideology on municipal pandemic responses in 2020. The analysis focused on formal policy measures and behavioral outcomes, particularly compliance with social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mayoral partisan ideology had minimal influence on formal pandemic policymaking at the municipal level, challenging assumptions based on national partisan cues. However, municipalities led by right-wing mayors showed lower compliance with social isolation in the short term, despite no significant differences in formal policies and overall compliance across the first year of the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight the complexity of partisan influence on health policymaking during crises. While national politics may shape public discourse, institutional structures and political and electoral interests can mitigate ideological effects on local policymaking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 118607"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625009384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Political polarization can influence policy responses, particularly during crises. While institutions aim to counterbalance these effects, their capacity to do so under stress remains underexplored. This study examines whether mayoral partisan ideology affected pandemic policymaking in Brazilian municipalities, a highly polarized context with a severe COVID-19 health burden.

Methods

We used a regression discontinuity design in 599 closely contested mayoral elections in 2016 to identify causal effects of partisan ideology on municipal pandemic responses in 2020. The analysis focused on formal policy measures and behavioral outcomes, particularly compliance with social isolation.

Results

Mayoral partisan ideology had minimal influence on formal pandemic policymaking at the municipal level, challenging assumptions based on national partisan cues. However, municipalities led by right-wing mayors showed lower compliance with social isolation in the short term, despite no significant differences in formal policies and overall compliance across the first year of the pandemic.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the complexity of partisan influence on health policymaking during crises. While national politics may shape public discourse, institutional structures and political and electoral interests can mitigate ideological effects on local policymaking.
超越党派言论:巴西的制度限制和地方COVID-19政策
政治两极分化会影响政策反应,尤其是在危机期间。虽然各机构的目标是抵消这些影响,但它们在压力下做到这一点的能力仍未得到充分探索。本研究考察了市长的党派意识形态是否影响了巴西各城市的大流行政策制定,这是一个高度两极分化的背景,造成了严重的COVID-19卫生负担。方法对2016年竞争激烈的599个市长选举进行回归不连续设计,以确定党派意识形态对2020年城市流行病应对的因果影响。分析的重点是正式政策措施和行为结果,特别是遵守社会隔离的情况。结果市长党派意识形态对市级正式流行病决策的影响最小,挑战了基于国家党派线索的假设。然而,右翼市长领导的城市在短期内对社会隔离的遵守程度较低,尽管在大流行的第一年,正式政策和总体遵守情况没有显著差异。这些发现突出了危机期间党派对卫生政策制定影响的复杂性。虽然国家政治可能会影响公共话语,但制度结构以及政治和选举利益可以减轻意识形态对地方决策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信