Safeguarding worker psychosocial well-being in the age of AI: The critical role of decision control

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Mario Passalacqua , Robert Pellerin , Florian Magnani , Laurent Joblot , Frédéric Rosin , Esma Yahia , Pierre-Majorique Léger
{"title":"Safeguarding worker psychosocial well-being in the age of AI: The critical role of decision control","authors":"Mario Passalacqua ,&nbsp;Robert Pellerin ,&nbsp;Florian Magnani ,&nbsp;Laurent Joblot ,&nbsp;Frédéric Rosin ,&nbsp;Esma Yahia ,&nbsp;Pierre-Majorique Léger","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, transforming workplace dynamics with AI's enhanced decision-making capabilities. While AI has been shown to reduce worker mental workload, improve performance, and enhance physical safety, it also has the potential to negatively impact psychosocial factors, such as work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, and motivation, among others. These factors are crucial as they impact employee retention, well-being, and organizational performance. Yet, the impact of automating decision-making aspects of work on the psychosocial dimension of human-AI interaction remains largely unknown due to the lack of empirical evidence. To address this gap, our study conducted an experiment with 102 participants in a laboratory designed to replicate a manufacturing line. We manipulated the level of AI decision support—characterized by the AI's decision-making control—to observe its effects on worker psychosocial factors through a blend of perceptual, physiological, and observational measures. Our aim was to discern the differential impacts of fully versus partially automated AI decision support on workers' perceptions of job meaningfulness, autonomy, competence, motivation, engagement, and performance on an error-detection task. The results of this study suggest the presence of a critical boundary in automation for psychosocial factors, demonstrating that while some automation of decision selection can nurture work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, competence, self-determined motivation, and engagement, there is a pivotal point beyond which these benefits can decline. Thus, balancing AI assistance with human control is vital to protect psychosocial well‑being. Practically, industry and operations managers should keep employees involved in decision making by adopting partial, confirm‑or‑override AI systems that sustain motivation and engagement, boosting retention and productivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 103649"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158192500206X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in the era of the fourth industrial revolution, transforming workplace dynamics with AI's enhanced decision-making capabilities. While AI has been shown to reduce worker mental workload, improve performance, and enhance physical safety, it also has the potential to negatively impact psychosocial factors, such as work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, and motivation, among others. These factors are crucial as they impact employee retention, well-being, and organizational performance. Yet, the impact of automating decision-making aspects of work on the psychosocial dimension of human-AI interaction remains largely unknown due to the lack of empirical evidence. To address this gap, our study conducted an experiment with 102 participants in a laboratory designed to replicate a manufacturing line. We manipulated the level of AI decision support—characterized by the AI's decision-making control—to observe its effects on worker psychosocial factors through a blend of perceptual, physiological, and observational measures. Our aim was to discern the differential impacts of fully versus partially automated AI decision support on workers' perceptions of job meaningfulness, autonomy, competence, motivation, engagement, and performance on an error-detection task. The results of this study suggest the presence of a critical boundary in automation for psychosocial factors, demonstrating that while some automation of decision selection can nurture work meaningfulness, worker autonomy, competence, self-determined motivation, and engagement, there is a pivotal point beyond which these benefits can decline. Thus, balancing AI assistance with human control is vital to protect psychosocial well‑being. Practically, industry and operations managers should keep employees involved in decision making by adopting partial, confirm‑or‑override AI systems that sustain motivation and engagement, boosting retention and productivity.
在人工智能时代保障工作者的社会心理健康:决策控制的关键作用
人工智能(AI)的发展引领了第四次工业革命时代,通过人工智能增强的决策能力改变了工作场所的动态。虽然人工智能已被证明可以减少工人的精神工作量,提高绩效,增强人身安全,但它也有可能对社会心理因素产生负面影响,如工作意义,工人自主权和动机等。这些因素至关重要,因为它们会影响员工的留任、幸福感和组织绩效。然而,由于缺乏经验证据,自动化决策方面的工作对人类与人工智能互动的社会心理维度的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。为了解决这一差距,我们的研究在一个旨在复制生产线的实验室中对102名参与者进行了一项实验。我们操纵人工智能决策支持的水平——以人工智能的决策控制为特征——通过感知、生理和观察措施的混合来观察其对工人心理社会因素的影响。我们的目的是辨别完全自动化和部分自动化的人工智能决策支持对工人对工作意义、自主性、能力、动机、参与度和错误检测任务表现的看法的不同影响。本研究的结果表明,在社会心理因素的自动化中存在一个关键的边界,表明虽然决策选择的一些自动化可以培养工作的意义、员工的自主性、能力、自主动机和参与度,但有一个关键点,超过了这个临界点,这些好处就会下降。因此,平衡人工智能援助与人类控制对于保护社会心理健康至关重要。实际上,行业和运营经理应该通过采用部分、确认或覆盖的人工智能系统来保持员工参与决策,从而保持积极性和参与度,提高员工留存率和生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities. Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to: • Innovative interaction techniques • Multimodal interaction • Speech interaction • Graphic interaction • Natural language interaction • Interaction in mobile and embedded systems • Interface design and evaluation methodologies • Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems • User interface prototyping and management systems • Ubiquitous computing • Wearable computers • Pervasive computing • Affective computing • Empirical studies of user behaviour • Empirical studies of programming and software engineering • Computer supported cooperative work • Computer mediated communication • Virtual reality • Mixed and augmented Reality • Intelligent user interfaces • Presence ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信