Khai Jie Wong , Yu Xuan Leiu , Do Yee Hoo , Yasunori Kikuchi , Yuichiro Kanematsu , Khang Wei Tan , Heng Yi Teah
{"title":"Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of nanocellulose synthesis via chlorine-free biomass pretreatments","authors":"Khai Jie Wong , Yu Xuan Leiu , Do Yee Hoo , Yasunori Kikuchi , Yuichiro Kanematsu , Khang Wei Tan , Heng Yi Teah","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nanocellulose fibers (CNF) encompass the characteristics of cellulose and nanomaterials, are endowed with great potential for diverse applications. Prior to the extraction of nanocellulose, pretreating biomass to remove lignin and hemicellulose is crucial to ease cellulose isolation at minimal environmental and economic costs. This study presents a comprehensive comparison between acid-chlorite (AC), alkaline peroxide (AP), and hydrogen peroxide-acetic acid (HPAC) treatments, revealing that the latter two total chlorine-free technologies are promising alternatives to AC. Experimental data served as the primary input to the life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) to evaluate the quality of CNFs produced and investigate the trade-offs between environmental burden and costs associated with the three bleaching pathways. The FTIR and FESEM analyses showed a successful CNF synthesis regardless of the applied bleaching technique. Notably, CNF-AC was the least eco-efficient at industrial-scale production due to its low yield and the use of chemicals. CNF-AP emerged as the greenest option; however, CNF-HPAC was the most cost-effective with a moderate environmental load for its low electricity consumption, which resulted from the short reaction time required and satisfactory yield. This study highlighted the potential of HPAC technology as a promising alternative to conventional AC treatment in CNF production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107912"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025011796","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nanocellulose fibers (CNF) encompass the characteristics of cellulose and nanomaterials, are endowed with great potential for diverse applications. Prior to the extraction of nanocellulose, pretreating biomass to remove lignin and hemicellulose is crucial to ease cellulose isolation at minimal environmental and economic costs. This study presents a comprehensive comparison between acid-chlorite (AC), alkaline peroxide (AP), and hydrogen peroxide-acetic acid (HPAC) treatments, revealing that the latter two total chlorine-free technologies are promising alternatives to AC. Experimental data served as the primary input to the life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) to evaluate the quality of CNFs produced and investigate the trade-offs between environmental burden and costs associated with the three bleaching pathways. The FTIR and FESEM analyses showed a successful CNF synthesis regardless of the applied bleaching technique. Notably, CNF-AC was the least eco-efficient at industrial-scale production due to its low yield and the use of chemicals. CNF-AP emerged as the greenest option; however, CNF-HPAC was the most cost-effective with a moderate environmental load for its low electricity consumption, which resulted from the short reaction time required and satisfactory yield. This study highlighted the potential of HPAC technology as a promising alternative to conventional AC treatment in CNF production.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.