Interprofessional simulation co-debriefing practices: A systematic review

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Elisabeth Jacob PhD, RN , Tracy Parrish RN , Clare Duffy BA, GCETE, GDIM , Sara Geale PhD, RN , Scott Stewart PhD , Kylie Kendrick MPH
{"title":"Interprofessional simulation co-debriefing practices: A systematic review","authors":"Elisabeth Jacob PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Tracy Parrish RN ,&nbsp;Clare Duffy BA, GCETE, GDIM ,&nbsp;Sara Geale PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Scott Stewart PhD ,&nbsp;Kylie Kendrick MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interprofessional simulation allows healthcare students to practice the role of a professional with students from other professions. Debriefing is essential to the simulation, promoting insight into actions taken and thought processes behind the actions. The impact of co-debrief with interprofessional teams remains in question. This paper aims to explore the impact of co-debriefing on student experiences. This systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist (PRISMA). Search terms including “inter-professional education,” “simulation,” “co-debriefing,” and “university students” were undertaken across seven databases. Twenty-seven papers with students from 17 professions were included. Simulations were considered effective, however the impact of co-debriefing on student outcomes was not explored in any studies. Debriefing is imperative to healthcare simulation, yet little evidence is available to support the role of co- debriefing. Further research is required to determine its effectiveness and appropriateness for all inter-professional simulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187613992500132X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interprofessional simulation allows healthcare students to practice the role of a professional with students from other professions. Debriefing is essential to the simulation, promoting insight into actions taken and thought processes behind the actions. The impact of co-debrief with interprofessional teams remains in question. This paper aims to explore the impact of co-debriefing on student experiences. This systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses checklist (PRISMA). Search terms including “inter-professional education,” “simulation,” “co-debriefing,” and “university students” were undertaken across seven databases. Twenty-seven papers with students from 17 professions were included. Simulations were considered effective, however the impact of co-debriefing on student outcomes was not explored in any studies. Debriefing is imperative to healthcare simulation, yet little evidence is available to support the role of co- debriefing. Further research is required to determine its effectiveness and appropriateness for all inter-professional simulations.
跨专业模拟联合汇报实践:系统回顾
跨专业模拟允许医疗保健学生与来自其他专业的学生一起实践专业角色。汇报对模拟来说是必不可少的,它有助于深入了解所采取的行动和行动背后的思维过程。与跨专业团队共同汇报的影响仍然存在疑问。本文旨在探讨共同汇报对学生体验的影响。本系统文献综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目清单(PRISMA)。包括“跨专业教育”、“模拟”、“共同汇报”和“大学生”在内的搜索词在七个数据库中进行了研究。论文27篇,来自17个专业。模拟被认为是有效的,然而,在任何研究中都没有探讨共同汇报对学生成绩的影响。报告是医疗保健模拟的必要条件,但很少有证据支持共同报告的作用。需要进一步研究以确定其对所有专业间模拟的有效性和适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信