Dissection of immunotherapeutic predictive versus prognostic transcriptional programs identifies SLC22A5-centric carnitine metabolism-driven resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 treatment in non-small cell lung cancer
Yu-Ze Wang , Ning Gao , Zhanwen Lin , Si-Heng Wang , Shichang Ai , Zhanqi Wei , Shuishen Zhang , Junchao Cai , Weixiong Yang , Si-Cong Ma , Chao Cheng
{"title":"Dissection of immunotherapeutic predictive versus prognostic transcriptional programs identifies SLC22A5-centric carnitine metabolism-driven resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 treatment in non-small cell lung cancer","authors":"Yu-Ze Wang , Ning Gao , Zhanwen Lin , Si-Heng Wang , Shichang Ai , Zhanqi Wei , Shuishen Zhang , Junchao Cai , Weixiong Yang , Si-Cong Ma , Chao Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.drup.2025.101313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are two common biomarker types in clinics, with the former indicating the natural course of cancer regardless of treatment, and the latter determining the response to a specific regimen. Understanding the predictive versus prognostic effect of biomarkers is essential to understand treatment-specific response from the inherent prognosis of cancer. Herein, we aimed to uncover the predictive metabolic signatures specific to immunotherapy resistance by distinguishing the predictive versus prognostic effect of transcriptional programs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical and transcriptomic data were collected from two randomized controlled trials, OAK (n = 699, discovery cohort) and POPLAR (n = 192, validation cohort) comparing immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Metabolic transcriptional signature scores were calculated through gene set variation analysis. Cox regression and interaction test were conducted to differentiate the predictive versus prognostic effect. Additionally, lung tumor-bearing murine models were established using <em>Slc22a5</em>-overexpressing (OE) and control Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cells, and treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy. The translational potential of an SLC22A5 (Solute Carrier Family 22 Member 5) inhibitor in combination with immunotherapy was assessed in preclinical setting. The tumor microenvironment was analyzed by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to validate the mechanistic findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Metabolic transcriptional programs were divided into four categories based on different predictive effects specific to immunotherapy or chemotherapy, among which carnitine metabolism stood out as the most prominent metabolic process contributing to the resistance to immunotherapy. Specifically, SLC22A5 as the only high-affinity carnitine transporter was remarkably upregulated in immunotherapy-resistant patients. The predictive effect of SLC22A5-centric carnitine metabolism for resistance to immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy was independently validated in an external randomized trial. Critically, preclinical models revealed that <em>Slc22a5</em> overexpression drove resistance to immunotherapy but not chemotherapy, by fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by M2 macrophage accumulation and CD8 + T cell exclusion. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of SLC22A5 by meldonium reshaped the tumor microenvironment toward a more inflamed state and re-sensitized resistant tumors to immunotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study elucidates the predictive versus prognostic effect of metabolic pathways in advanced NSCLC under immunotherapy. Tumor-intrinsic carnitine metabolism may predict and drive immunotherapy resistance, and targeting SLC22A5-mediated carnitine metabolism could be used to overcome resistance in advanced NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51022,"journal":{"name":"Drug Resistance Updates","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101313"},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Resistance Updates","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368764625001165","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Prognostic and predictive biomarkers are two common biomarker types in clinics, with the former indicating the natural course of cancer regardless of treatment, and the latter determining the response to a specific regimen. Understanding the predictive versus prognostic effect of biomarkers is essential to understand treatment-specific response from the inherent prognosis of cancer. Herein, we aimed to uncover the predictive metabolic signatures specific to immunotherapy resistance by distinguishing the predictive versus prognostic effect of transcriptional programs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy.
Methods
Clinical and transcriptomic data were collected from two randomized controlled trials, OAK (n = 699, discovery cohort) and POPLAR (n = 192, validation cohort) comparing immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Metabolic transcriptional signature scores were calculated through gene set variation analysis. Cox regression and interaction test were conducted to differentiate the predictive versus prognostic effect. Additionally, lung tumor-bearing murine models were established using Slc22a5-overexpressing (OE) and control Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cells, and treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy. The translational potential of an SLC22A5 (Solute Carrier Family 22 Member 5) inhibitor in combination with immunotherapy was assessed in preclinical setting. The tumor microenvironment was analyzed by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to validate the mechanistic findings.
Results
Metabolic transcriptional programs were divided into four categories based on different predictive effects specific to immunotherapy or chemotherapy, among which carnitine metabolism stood out as the most prominent metabolic process contributing to the resistance to immunotherapy. Specifically, SLC22A5 as the only high-affinity carnitine transporter was remarkably upregulated in immunotherapy-resistant patients. The predictive effect of SLC22A5-centric carnitine metabolism for resistance to immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy was independently validated in an external randomized trial. Critically, preclinical models revealed that Slc22a5 overexpression drove resistance to immunotherapy but not chemotherapy, by fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment characterized by M2 macrophage accumulation and CD8 + T cell exclusion. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of SLC22A5 by meldonium reshaped the tumor microenvironment toward a more inflamed state and re-sensitized resistant tumors to immunotherapy.
Conclusions
Our study elucidates the predictive versus prognostic effect of metabolic pathways in advanced NSCLC under immunotherapy. Tumor-intrinsic carnitine metabolism may predict and drive immunotherapy resistance, and targeting SLC22A5-mediated carnitine metabolism could be used to overcome resistance in advanced NSCLC.
期刊介绍:
Drug Resistance Updates serves as a platform for publishing original research, commentary, and expert reviews on significant advancements in drug resistance related to infectious diseases and cancer. It encompasses diverse disciplines such as molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, pharmacology, microbiology, preclinical therapeutics, oncology, and clinical medicine. The journal addresses both basic research and clinical aspects of drug resistance, providing insights into novel drugs and strategies to overcome resistance. Original research articles are welcomed, and review articles are authored by leaders in the field by invitation.
Articles are written by leaders in the field, in response to an invitation from the Editors, and are peer-reviewed prior to publication. Articles are clear, readable, and up-to-date, suitable for a multidisciplinary readership and include schematic diagrams and other illustrations conveying the major points of the article. The goal is to highlight recent areas of growth and put them in perspective.
*Expert reviews in clinical and basic drug resistance research in oncology and infectious disease
*Describes emerging technologies and therapies, particularly those that overcome drug resistance
*Emphasises common themes in microbial and cancer research