Predictors of satisfaction and self-confidence in simulation learning among healthcare students in Vietnam

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Tran Thi Ngoc Tho , Tran Thi My , Tran Cong Huyen Trang
{"title":"Predictors of satisfaction and self-confidence in simulation learning among healthcare students in Vietnam","authors":"Tran Thi Ngoc Tho ,&nbsp;Tran Thi My ,&nbsp;Tran Cong Huyen Trang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulation-based learning is increasingly used in healthcare education to enhance students’ clinical competence, satisfaction, and self-confidence. While simulation has been widely adopted in Vietnam, evidence on its effectiveness and the factors influencing learner outcomes remains limited.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the levels of satisfaction and self-confidence among healthcare students following simulation-based learning and to identify key predictors of these outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 284 undergraduate healthcare students from various disciplines at a private university in Vietnam. Data were collected using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale and the Simulation Design Scale. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants reported high satisfaction (4.31 ± 0.77) and self-confidence (4.24 ± 0.67) scores. The Simulation Design Scale was the strongest predictor of both satisfaction (β = 0.823, <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and self-confidence (β = 0.819, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Academic performance also significantly predicted satisfaction (β = 0.083, <em>p</em> = .013) and self-confidence (β = 0.096, <em>p</em> = .004). Additionally, students’ perception of the debriefing session significantly influenced satisfaction (β = 0.083, <em>p</em> = .017). The regression models explained 71.6% and 71.3% of the variance in satisfaction and self-confidence, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Simulation-based learning is an effective strategy for enhancing satisfaction and self-confidence among healthcare students. Simulation design quality, academic performance, and the debriefing experience are critical elements influencing student outcomes. These findings support the continued integration and refinement of simulation in health professions education in Vietnam.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925001446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Simulation-based learning is increasingly used in healthcare education to enhance students’ clinical competence, satisfaction, and self-confidence. While simulation has been widely adopted in Vietnam, evidence on its effectiveness and the factors influencing learner outcomes remains limited.

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the levels of satisfaction and self-confidence among healthcare students following simulation-based learning and to identify key predictors of these outcomes.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 284 undergraduate healthcare students from various disciplines at a private university in Vietnam. Data were collected using the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale and the Simulation Design Scale. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data.

Results

Participants reported high satisfaction (4.31 ± 0.77) and self-confidence (4.24 ± 0.67) scores. The Simulation Design Scale was the strongest predictor of both satisfaction (β = 0.823, p < .001) and self-confidence (β = 0.819, p < .001). Academic performance also significantly predicted satisfaction (β = 0.083, p = .013) and self-confidence (β = 0.096, p = .004). Additionally, students’ perception of the debriefing session significantly influenced satisfaction (β = 0.083, p = .017). The regression models explained 71.6% and 71.3% of the variance in satisfaction and self-confidence, respectively.

Conclusion

Simulation-based learning is an effective strategy for enhancing satisfaction and self-confidence among healthcare students. Simulation design quality, academic performance, and the debriefing experience are critical elements influencing student outcomes. These findings support the continued integration and refinement of simulation in health professions education in Vietnam.
越南卫生保健学生模拟学习满意度和自信心的预测因素
基于模拟的学习越来越多地应用于卫生保健教育中,以提高学生的临床能力、满意度和自信心。虽然模拟在越南被广泛采用,但关于其有效性和影响学习者成绩的因素的证据仍然有限。目的本研究旨在评估医疗保健专业学生在模拟学习后的满意度和自信心水平,并确定这些结果的关键预测因素。方法对越南一所私立大学不同学科的284名本科保健专业学生进行横断面调查。采用《学生学习满意度与自信心量表》和《模拟设计量表》收集数据。采用描述性统计、Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和多元线性回归对数据进行分析。结果参与者满意度(4.31±0.77)和自信心(4.24±0.67)得分较高。模拟设计量表是满意度(β = 0.823, p < .001)和自信心(β = 0.819, p < .001)的最强预测因子。学业成绩显著预测满意度(β = 0.083, p = 0.013)和自信心(β = 0.096, p = 0.004)。此外,学生对述职会议的感知显著影响满意度(β = 0.083, p = 0.017)。回归模型分别解释了满意度和自信心方差的71.6%和71.3%。结论模拟学习是提高卫生专业学生满意度和自信心的有效策略。模拟设计质量、学习成绩和汇报经验是影响学生成绩的关键因素。这些发现支持越南卫生专业教育中模拟的持续整合和完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信