{"title":"The development of copula/affirmative response marker polysemy in Chinese and other languages in China","authors":"Haiping Long","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2025.104028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contact with Chinese may explain the development of copula/affirmative response marker polysemy in other languages in China. Chinese <em>shì</em> developed the polysemous pattern because it underwent polygrammaticalization in Old Chinese: (a) pronominal demonstrative > demonstrative verb of manner > affirmative response marker, and (b) pronominal demonstrative > copula. Since Middle Chinese, most other usages have disappeared, and the polysemy has persisted for over a millennium. Speakers of other languages in China were in contact with Chinese, and adopted one of the three strategies to incorporate this polysemy: (a) using Chinese <em>shì</em> as a loan word to function as copula and affirmative response marker in the target language, (b) using the copula of the target language to function as affirmative response marker, and (c) using the attributive adjective meaning ‘true, correct’ of the target language to function as copula and affirmative response marker, typically starting with copula. The latter two strategies support two arguments: (a) grammatical changes in language contact do not always involve grammaticalization, and (b) speakers of the target language may sometimes adopt linguistic items with more abstract meaning to refer to more concrete polysemous meaning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 104028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384125001536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contact with Chinese may explain the development of copula/affirmative response marker polysemy in other languages in China. Chinese shì developed the polysemous pattern because it underwent polygrammaticalization in Old Chinese: (a) pronominal demonstrative > demonstrative verb of manner > affirmative response marker, and (b) pronominal demonstrative > copula. Since Middle Chinese, most other usages have disappeared, and the polysemy has persisted for over a millennium. Speakers of other languages in China were in contact with Chinese, and adopted one of the three strategies to incorporate this polysemy: (a) using Chinese shì as a loan word to function as copula and affirmative response marker in the target language, (b) using the copula of the target language to function as affirmative response marker, and (c) using the attributive adjective meaning ‘true, correct’ of the target language to function as copula and affirmative response marker, typically starting with copula. The latter two strategies support two arguments: (a) grammatical changes in language contact do not always involve grammaticalization, and (b) speakers of the target language may sometimes adopt linguistic items with more abstract meaning to refer to more concrete polysemous meaning.
期刊介绍:
Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.