A systematic review of enteric pathogens in solid waste disposal sites and surrounding environments

IF 3.3 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Richard Lizwe Steven Mvula , Amber N. Barnes , John Njalam’mano , Fasil Ejigu Eregno , Wilfred Kadewa
{"title":"A systematic review of enteric pathogens in solid waste disposal sites and surrounding environments","authors":"Richard Lizwe Steven Mvula ,&nbsp;Amber N. Barnes ,&nbsp;John Njalam’mano ,&nbsp;Fasil Ejigu Eregno ,&nbsp;Wilfred Kadewa","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solid waste disposal sites and indiscriminate dumping are favorable breeding grounds for various pathogens, including enteric pathogens. The pathogens include protozoan parasites, bacteria, and viruses. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of various enteric pathogens at solid waste disposal sites and surrounding environments. Additionally, it analyzed detection methods, assessed reported antimicrobial resistance, and identified the research gaps in the literature. We searched five databases, targeting peer-reviewed articles from January 2003 to June 2024. Thirty-eight articles were retained for final analysis. The results indicate that at least one enteric pathogen was detected in every study. 71 % of the studies reported on bacteria, 13 % on parasites, 5.3 % on viruses, and the remaining percentage was on multiple pathogens. Evidence indicates the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in solid waste disposal sites. Culture-based enteric pathogen detection methods dominated compared to molecular and microscopic techniques. Our work identified research gaps such as a lack of completeness and underrepresentation of data in all geographic regions, such as low- and middle-income countries. Further, not all enteric pathogens have been extensively studied, leaving a gap in understanding their impacts. Additionally, the studies are missing the pathways for transmitting enteric pathogens and the employment of quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA). We recommend more thorough studies for all pathogens, including fungi, and prioritizing research in low and middle-income countries. Additionally, implementing quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA) and integrating a holistic One Health approach in studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article e02994"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625004648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid waste disposal sites and indiscriminate dumping are favorable breeding grounds for various pathogens, including enteric pathogens. The pathogens include protozoan parasites, bacteria, and viruses. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of various enteric pathogens at solid waste disposal sites and surrounding environments. Additionally, it analyzed detection methods, assessed reported antimicrobial resistance, and identified the research gaps in the literature. We searched five databases, targeting peer-reviewed articles from January 2003 to June 2024. Thirty-eight articles were retained for final analysis. The results indicate that at least one enteric pathogen was detected in every study. 71 % of the studies reported on bacteria, 13 % on parasites, 5.3 % on viruses, and the remaining percentage was on multiple pathogens. Evidence indicates the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in solid waste disposal sites. Culture-based enteric pathogen detection methods dominated compared to molecular and microscopic techniques. Our work identified research gaps such as a lack of completeness and underrepresentation of data in all geographic regions, such as low- and middle-income countries. Further, not all enteric pathogens have been extensively studied, leaving a gap in understanding their impacts. Additionally, the studies are missing the pathways for transmitting enteric pathogens and the employment of quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA). We recommend more thorough studies for all pathogens, including fungi, and prioritizing research in low and middle-income countries. Additionally, implementing quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA) and integrating a holistic One Health approach in studies.
固体废物处理场及其周围环境中肠道病原体的系统综述
固体废物处理场和任意倾倒是各种病原体,包括肠道病原体的良好滋生地。病原体包括原生动物、寄生虫、细菌和病毒。本研究旨在了解固体废物处理场及其周围环境中各种肠道病原体的流行情况。此外,它分析了检测方法,评估了报告的抗菌素耐药性,并确定了文献中的研究空白。我们检索了五个数据库,以2003年1月至2024年6月的同行评议文章为目标。保留38篇文章作最后分析。结果表明,在每项研究中至少检测到一种肠道病原体。71%的研究报告了细菌,13%的研究报告了寄生虫,5.3%的研究报告了病毒,其余的研究报告了多种病原体。有证据表明,固体废物处理场所普遍存在抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)和抗微生物药物耐药性基因(ARGs)。与分子和显微技术相比,基于培养的肠道病原体检测方法占主导地位。我们的工作确定了研究差距,例如所有地理区域(如低收入和中等收入国家)的数据缺乏完整性和代表性不足。此外,并不是所有的肠道病原体都得到了广泛的研究,在了解它们的影响方面留下了空白。此外,这些研究还缺少肠道病原体的传播途径和定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)的应用。我们建议对包括真菌在内的所有病原体进行更彻底的研究,并优先考虑低收入和中等收入国家的研究。此外,实施定量微生物风险评估(QMRA),并在研究中整合整体的“同一个健康”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信