General interaction battery: Simple object navigation and affordances (GIBSONA)

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Danaja Rutar , Alva Markelius , Wout Schellaert , José Hernández-Orallo , Lucy Cheke
{"title":"General interaction battery: Simple object navigation and affordances (GIBSONA)","authors":"Danaja Rutar ,&nbsp;Alva Markelius ,&nbsp;Wout Schellaert ,&nbsp;José Hernández-Orallo ,&nbsp;Lucy Cheke","doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Perception of affordances</em> is an agent’s capability to identify what action-possibilities exist with a particular object or set of objects, based on its own physical properties and capacities. This capability has been well explored in psychology because perception of affordances provides the basis for understanding and interacting with the world. For the same reason, affordance perception is also crucial for AI research. Most approaches to evaluating AI are <em>task-oriented</em> which means that they are geared towards evaluating aggregate performance on a specific set of tasks, rather than focusing on the nature and degree of underlying <em>capabilities</em> that drive task performance. An alternative approach to measuring performance in AI is <em>capability-oriented</em> evaluation, which aims to measure robust, task-independent capabilities across different conditions and difficulties. This approach allows not only measurement of performance but also prediction of performance on novel challenges that share the same fundamental demands. In the context of affordances, there are currently no clear guidelines as to how such capability-oriented approach should best be implemented; for example, there is much variation in what perception of affordances entails. Perhaps for this reason, no comprehensive battery of affordances tasks for AI currently exists. Building on this gap, the aims of this paper are to first, lay out some candidate guidelines for the construction of capability-oriented task batteries for embodied AI and second, to construct and present a battery GIBSONA that takes a step towards this goal: Assessing perception of a set of affordances in AI, directly following these guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55242,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Systems Research","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389041725000919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perception of affordances is an agent’s capability to identify what action-possibilities exist with a particular object or set of objects, based on its own physical properties and capacities. This capability has been well explored in psychology because perception of affordances provides the basis for understanding and interacting with the world. For the same reason, affordance perception is also crucial for AI research. Most approaches to evaluating AI are task-oriented which means that they are geared towards evaluating aggregate performance on a specific set of tasks, rather than focusing on the nature and degree of underlying capabilities that drive task performance. An alternative approach to measuring performance in AI is capability-oriented evaluation, which aims to measure robust, task-independent capabilities across different conditions and difficulties. This approach allows not only measurement of performance but also prediction of performance on novel challenges that share the same fundamental demands. In the context of affordances, there are currently no clear guidelines as to how such capability-oriented approach should best be implemented; for example, there is much variation in what perception of affordances entails. Perhaps for this reason, no comprehensive battery of affordances tasks for AI currently exists. Building on this gap, the aims of this paper are to first, lay out some candidate guidelines for the construction of capability-oriented task batteries for embodied AI and second, to construct and present a battery GIBSONA that takes a step towards this goal: Assessing perception of a set of affordances in AI, directly following these guidelines.
通用交互电池:简单对象导航和启示(GIBSONA)
对启示的感知是agent基于自身的物理属性和能力,识别特定对象或一组对象存在何种行动可能性的能力。这种能力在心理学上已经得到了很好的探索,因为对能力的感知提供了理解和与世界互动的基础。出于同样的原因,可视性感知对人工智能研究也至关重要。大多数评估人工智能的方法都是面向任务的,这意味着它们旨在评估特定任务集的总体性能,而不是关注驱动任务性能的底层能力的性质和程度。衡量人工智能性能的另一种方法是以能力为导向的评估,其目的是衡量在不同条件和困难下的稳健、任务独立的能力。这种方法不仅可以测量性能,还可以预测具有相同基本要求的新挑战的性能。在提供方面,目前没有明确的准则说明如何最好地执行这种面向能力的办法;例如,对可视性的感知有很多变化。也许正是出于这个原因,目前还没有针对人工智能的全面的功能支持任务。基于这一差距,本文的目的是首先,为具体化人工智能的能力导向任务电池的构建制定一些候选指南,其次,构建并呈现一个电池GIBSONA,朝着这一目标迈出了一步:评估对人工智能中一系列功能的感知,直接遵循这些指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Systems Research
Cognitive Systems Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Systems Research is dedicated to the study of human-level cognition. As such, it welcomes papers which advance the understanding, design and applications of cognitive and intelligent systems, both natural and artificial. The journal brings together a broad community studying cognition in its many facets in vivo and in silico, across the developmental spectrum, focusing on individual capacities or on entire architectures. It aims to foster debate and integrate ideas, concepts, constructs, theories, models and techniques from across different disciplines and different perspectives on human-level cognition. The scope of interest includes the study of cognitive capacities and architectures - both brain-inspired and non-brain-inspired - and the application of cognitive systems to real-world problems as far as it offers insights relevant for the understanding of cognition. Cognitive Systems Research therefore welcomes mature and cutting-edge research approaching cognition from a systems-oriented perspective, both theoretical and empirically-informed, in the form of original manuscripts, short communications, opinion articles, systematic reviews, and topical survey articles from the fields of Cognitive Science (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science), Artificial Intelligence/Computer Science, Cognitive Robotics, Developmental Science, Psychology, and Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Engineering. Empirical studies will be considered if they are supplemented by theoretical analyses and contributions to theory development and/or computational modelling studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信