“We stole her back too” - Acts of resistance and restoration when traditional governance and authority of child and family matters is reclaimed by the grandmothers of a First Nation community

Val Wood, Catherine Twinn , Connie Santos, Bob Lonne
{"title":"“We stole her back too” - Acts of resistance and restoration when traditional governance and authority of child and family matters is reclaimed by the grandmothers of a First Nation community","authors":"Val Wood,&nbsp;Catherine Twinn ,&nbsp;Connie Santos,&nbsp;Bob Lonne","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Canada's 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission's findings concerning child welfare highlighted impacts resulting in Indigenous people's dispossession, trauma, separation, and relational upheavals through forced removals and lasting harm to children, families and communities. Canadian Provincial government legislation over child welfare authority dominates and these outcomes continue today through child apprehensions. In 2020 the Canadian Federal Government enacted Bill C-92 respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families; a legal framework intended to reduce the gross over-representation of Indigenous children in care. It affirms the inherent jurisdictional authority of Indigenous communities over their child and family matters. In 2024 following some Provincial Governments' legal challenges, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously confirmed C-92 is constitutional in its entirety.</div><div>This article chronicles the efforts of a team of Indigenous Dene, provincially-delegated workers with extensive experience working within provincial child and family legislative frameworks. Within 15-months 47 children taken by Alberta Children's Services from their rural community were returned and re-connected to their families, kin and culture. Culturally-based practices such as inclusion of ceremonial practices, using circle processes to conduct meetings and problem solve and respecting the traditional authority of matriarchs within the Indigenous Dene kinship system were key strategies in resisting and challenging the status quo of provincial child welfare authorities. These actions can encourage other communities to transform current child welfare approaches by restoring and reclaiming their own laws and traditional practices which offer alternative, humane and culturally-connected ways to protect children, support healing and rebuild communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193825001408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canada's 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission's findings concerning child welfare highlighted impacts resulting in Indigenous people's dispossession, trauma, separation, and relational upheavals through forced removals and lasting harm to children, families and communities. Canadian Provincial government legislation over child welfare authority dominates and these outcomes continue today through child apprehensions. In 2020 the Canadian Federal Government enacted Bill C-92 respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families; a legal framework intended to reduce the gross over-representation of Indigenous children in care. It affirms the inherent jurisdictional authority of Indigenous communities over their child and family matters. In 2024 following some Provincial Governments' legal challenges, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously confirmed C-92 is constitutional in its entirety.
This article chronicles the efforts of a team of Indigenous Dene, provincially-delegated workers with extensive experience working within provincial child and family legislative frameworks. Within 15-months 47 children taken by Alberta Children's Services from their rural community were returned and re-connected to their families, kin and culture. Culturally-based practices such as inclusion of ceremonial practices, using circle processes to conduct meetings and problem solve and respecting the traditional authority of matriarchs within the Indigenous Dene kinship system were key strategies in resisting and challenging the status quo of provincial child welfare authorities. These actions can encourage other communities to transform current child welfare approaches by restoring and reclaiming their own laws and traditional practices which offer alternative, humane and culturally-connected ways to protect children, support healing and rebuild communities.
“我们也把她偷回来了”——当传统的儿童和家庭事务的治理和权威被第一民族社区的祖母们收回时,反抗和恢复的行为
加拿大2015年真相与和解委员会关于儿童福利的调查结果强调了强迫迁移和对儿童、家庭和社区的持久伤害对土著人民造成的剥夺、创伤、分离和关系动荡的影响。加拿大省政府对儿童福利当局的立法占主导地位,这些结果今天通过儿童逮捕继续存在。2020年,加拿大联邦政府颁布了《第C-92号法案》,尊重第一民族、因纽特人和姆萨梅蒂斯人的儿童、青年和家庭;一个法律框架,旨在减少土著儿童在照料机构中的比例过高。它肯定土著社区对其儿童和家庭事务的固有管辖权。2024年,在一些省政府提出法律挑战后,加拿大最高法院一致确认C-92完全符合宪法。本文记录了在省儿童和家庭立法框架内具有丰富工作经验的省委派的土著迪尼人工作小组的努力。在15个月内,47名被艾伯塔省儿童服务中心从农村社区带走的儿童被送回,并重新与他们的家庭、亲属和文化联系起来。以文化为基础的做法,如纳入仪式做法、利用循环程序举行会议和解决问题以及尊重土著迪尼族亲属制度中女族长的传统权威,是抵制和挑战省级儿童福利当局现状的关键策略。这些行动可以鼓励其他社区通过恢复和恢复自己的法律和传统习俗来改变目前的儿童福利做法,这些法律和传统习俗提供了另一种、人道的和与文化相联系的方式来保护儿童,支持康复和重建社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信