Developing an adequate DEM model to simulate soil-tool interactions under sticky soil conditions

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Abouelnadar El Salem , Shuqi Shang , Dongwei Wang , Guozhong Zhang , Hongchang Wang , Mohamed Anwer Abdeen , Taher A. Shehabeldeen
{"title":"Developing an adequate DEM model to simulate soil-tool interactions under sticky soil conditions","authors":"Abouelnadar El Salem ,&nbsp;Shuqi Shang ,&nbsp;Dongwei Wang ,&nbsp;Guozhong Zhang ,&nbsp;Hongchang Wang ,&nbsp;Mohamed Anwer Abdeen ,&nbsp;Taher A. Shehabeldeen","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The numerical modelling of interactions between soil-engaging tools is crucial for designing more effective and affordable soil preparation equipment. In this study, the linear cohesion model was coupled with the hysteretic spring model (HSCM) to effectively represent soil cohesion behavior and plastic deformation in sticky soil found in paddy fields. The sensitivity of DEM-simulated soil bulk density to specific parameters of the proposed model was analyzed using a two-level factorial test to identify the key influencing parameters. The discrete element model was calibrated against experimentally determined wet bulk density (wet weight basis) to accurately represent the soil mass being displaced by soil-engaging tools, which is critical for draught prediction under high-moisture soil conditions. These key parameters were calibrated in two consecutive phases: (1) the steepest ascent design and (2) the Box-Behnken design to determine the optimum values of these parameters that minimize the relative error between the DEM-simulated bulk density and experimentally measured soil wet bulk density. The calibrated model was then validated through soil furrowing experiments, using the created furrow profile dimensions and the draught at different depths as evaluation metrics. The validation results demonstrate that the calibrated model achieves satisfactory predictive accuracy for draught across multiple furrowing depths, with relative errors between 7.5 % and 8.8 %. Furthermore, comparative analysis of furrow profile dimensions revealed that the model accurately simulates both width and depth, exhibiting relative errors of 14.7 % and 1.3 %, respectively. Thus, the proposed model can facilitate and accelerate the design and optimization of components that engage with sticky soil. The findings also offer a framework for selecting optimal DEM parameters for soft, sticky soils, minimizing the computational cost of model calibration in future applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 106893"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725004477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The numerical modelling of interactions between soil-engaging tools is crucial for designing more effective and affordable soil preparation equipment. In this study, the linear cohesion model was coupled with the hysteretic spring model (HSCM) to effectively represent soil cohesion behavior and plastic deformation in sticky soil found in paddy fields. The sensitivity of DEM-simulated soil bulk density to specific parameters of the proposed model was analyzed using a two-level factorial test to identify the key influencing parameters. The discrete element model was calibrated against experimentally determined wet bulk density (wet weight basis) to accurately represent the soil mass being displaced by soil-engaging tools, which is critical for draught prediction under high-moisture soil conditions. These key parameters were calibrated in two consecutive phases: (1) the steepest ascent design and (2) the Box-Behnken design to determine the optimum values of these parameters that minimize the relative error between the DEM-simulated bulk density and experimentally measured soil wet bulk density. The calibrated model was then validated through soil furrowing experiments, using the created furrow profile dimensions and the draught at different depths as evaluation metrics. The validation results demonstrate that the calibrated model achieves satisfactory predictive accuracy for draught across multiple furrowing depths, with relative errors between 7.5 % and 8.8 %. Furthermore, comparative analysis of furrow profile dimensions revealed that the model accurately simulates both width and depth, exhibiting relative errors of 14.7 % and 1.3 %, respectively. Thus, the proposed model can facilitate and accelerate the design and optimization of components that engage with sticky soil. The findings also offer a framework for selecting optimal DEM parameters for soft, sticky soils, minimizing the computational cost of model calibration in future applications.
开发一个适当的DEM模型来模拟粘性土壤条件下土壤-工具的相互作用
土壤接触工具之间相互作用的数值模拟对于设计更有效和负担得起的土壤制备设备至关重要。本文将线性黏聚模型与滞回弹簧模型(HSCM)相结合,有效地表征了稻田黏性土壤的黏聚行为和塑性变形。采用双水平析因检验分析dem模拟土壤容重对模型特定参数的敏感性,以确定关键影响参数。根据实验确定的湿容重(湿重为基础)对离散元模型进行校准,以准确地表示土壤参与工具所位移的土壤质量,这对于高湿度土壤条件下的干旱预测至关重要。这些关键参数在两个连续阶段进行校准:(1)最陡爬坡设计和(2)Box-Behnken设计,以确定这些参数的最佳值,使dem模拟的容重与实验测量的土壤湿容重之间的相对误差最小。然后通过土壤犁沟试验,以创建的犁沟轮廓尺寸和不同深度的吃水作为评价指标,对校准模型进行验证。验证结果表明,校正后的模型对多沟深的吃水预测精度较好,相对误差在7.5 % ~ 8.8 %之间。此外,对沟槽轮廓尺寸的对比分析表明,该模型准确地模拟了宽度和深度,相对误差分别为14.7 %和1.3 %。因此,所提出的模型可以促进和加速与粘性土壤接触的部件的设计和优化。研究结果还为选择软粘性土壤的最佳DEM参数提供了一个框架,从而最大限度地减少了未来应用中模型校准的计算成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信