{"title":"From inflammation to carcinogenesis: Distinct pathways and clinical implications of IBD-associated colorectal cancer compared with sporadic CRC","authors":"Anshu Kapadia , Drasti Joshi, Ankit Chavda, Parloop Bhatt","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2025.156249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer (IBD-CRC) represents a distinct clinical and molecular entity compared with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). While sporadic CRC arises through the adenoma–carcinoma sequence, IBD-CRC follows an inflammation–dysplasia–carcinoma pathway, characterized by early TP53 alterations, multifocality, and flat lesions that challenge detection. Contemporary epidemiology indicates declining IBD-CRC incidence in high-income regions due to improved surveillance, though risk remains elevated in subgroups with long-standing colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), or persistent inflammation. In contrast, underreporting in low- and middle-income countries obscures the true global burden. Advances in high-definition colonoscopy and chromoendoscopy have improved detection, yet optimal risk-adapted surveillance strategies remain underutilized. Molecular insights highlight differences in genetic alterations, immune evasion, and microbial drivers between IBD-CRC and sporadic CRC. This review synthesizes epidemiologic, pathogenetic, and clinical distinctions, underscores challenges in surveillance and reporting, and discusses emerging technologies—including liquid biopsy, artificial intelligence, and multi-omics—that may refine prevention and early detection. Recognition of IBD-CRC as a separate disease process is essential to optimize individualized risk stratification, surveillance algorithms, and therapeutic strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"275 ","pages":"Article 156249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S034403382500442X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer (IBD-CRC) represents a distinct clinical and molecular entity compared with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). While sporadic CRC arises through the adenoma–carcinoma sequence, IBD-CRC follows an inflammation–dysplasia–carcinoma pathway, characterized by early TP53 alterations, multifocality, and flat lesions that challenge detection. Contemporary epidemiology indicates declining IBD-CRC incidence in high-income regions due to improved surveillance, though risk remains elevated in subgroups with long-standing colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), or persistent inflammation. In contrast, underreporting in low- and middle-income countries obscures the true global burden. Advances in high-definition colonoscopy and chromoendoscopy have improved detection, yet optimal risk-adapted surveillance strategies remain underutilized. Molecular insights highlight differences in genetic alterations, immune evasion, and microbial drivers between IBD-CRC and sporadic CRC. This review synthesizes epidemiologic, pathogenetic, and clinical distinctions, underscores challenges in surveillance and reporting, and discusses emerging technologies—including liquid biopsy, artificial intelligence, and multi-omics—that may refine prevention and early detection. Recognition of IBD-CRC as a separate disease process is essential to optimize individualized risk stratification, surveillance algorithms, and therapeutic strategies.
期刊介绍:
Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.