Ana Larrañaga-Zumeta , Neco Villegas , Katerina Koutlia , Luis Diez , Ramón Agüero , Sandra Lagén
{"title":"Analysis of different functional split options for XR traffic in 5G-LENA","authors":"Ana Larrañaga-Zumeta , Neco Villegas , Katerina Koutlia , Luis Diez , Ramón Agüero , Sandra Lagén","doi":"10.1016/j.simpat.2025.103211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Virtualized Radio Access Networks (vRAN) allow the disaggregation of the RAN protocol stack into different network units. This disaggregation depends on the selected Functional Split (FS), ranging from Option 1 to Option 8. The possible combination of this virtualization paradigm with different FS configurations could enhance the agility, flexibility, and scalability of 5G and beyond networks. Several studies exploring FSs use open-source platforms such as srsRAN, which provide full-stack 4G and 5G RAN software. However, these platforms have limitations for large-scale network analysis and usually require hardware for realistic testing. In contrast, system-level simulators such as ns-3 5G-LENA accurately model key 5G RAN functionalities and provide a flexible, scalable, and entirely software-based environment to implement, test, and evaluate a wide range of features. Based on the above, in this work we present a software-based model for the ns-3 5G-LENA simulator that allows simulating various FS options. We study and evaluate these FS options, specifically Options 6, 7.3, 7.2, and 7.1. Moreover, we analyze their impact on the end-to-end system performance using eXtended Reality (XR) traffic and under diverse network conditions. Our analysis shows that an appropriate FS selection can improve overall performance, helping the system more effectively handle XR traffic demands across different network conditions. Specifically, when Fronthaul (FH) and bandwidth are not limiting, all FS configurations yield similar throughput and latency, with XR delays mostly below 11 ms and data rates closely matching the offered load. Under FH constraints, lower FSs (e.g., Options 6 or 7.3) are preferable due to large, bursty XR packets. Otherwise, for standardized Open RAN (O-RAN) 7.2 or 7.1 FSs, delays may exceed 50 ms and data rates degrade, significantly affecting XR traffic performance. This work provides the research community with an accessible tool for studying FSs in realistic 5G environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49518,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 103211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X25001467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Virtualized Radio Access Networks (vRAN) allow the disaggregation of the RAN protocol stack into different network units. This disaggregation depends on the selected Functional Split (FS), ranging from Option 1 to Option 8. The possible combination of this virtualization paradigm with different FS configurations could enhance the agility, flexibility, and scalability of 5G and beyond networks. Several studies exploring FSs use open-source platforms such as srsRAN, which provide full-stack 4G and 5G RAN software. However, these platforms have limitations for large-scale network analysis and usually require hardware for realistic testing. In contrast, system-level simulators such as ns-3 5G-LENA accurately model key 5G RAN functionalities and provide a flexible, scalable, and entirely software-based environment to implement, test, and evaluate a wide range of features. Based on the above, in this work we present a software-based model for the ns-3 5G-LENA simulator that allows simulating various FS options. We study and evaluate these FS options, specifically Options 6, 7.3, 7.2, and 7.1. Moreover, we analyze their impact on the end-to-end system performance using eXtended Reality (XR) traffic and under diverse network conditions. Our analysis shows that an appropriate FS selection can improve overall performance, helping the system more effectively handle XR traffic demands across different network conditions. Specifically, when Fronthaul (FH) and bandwidth are not limiting, all FS configurations yield similar throughput and latency, with XR delays mostly below 11 ms and data rates closely matching the offered load. Under FH constraints, lower FSs (e.g., Options 6 or 7.3) are preferable due to large, bursty XR packets. Otherwise, for standardized Open RAN (O-RAN) 7.2 or 7.1 FSs, delays may exceed 50 ms and data rates degrade, significantly affecting XR traffic performance. This work provides the research community with an accessible tool for studying FSs in realistic 5G environments.
期刊介绍:
The journal Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory provides a forum for original, high-quality papers dealing with any aspect of systems simulation and modelling.
The journal aims at being a reference and a powerful tool to all those professionally active and/or interested in the methods and applications of simulation. Submitted papers will be peer reviewed and must significantly contribute to modelling and simulation in general or use modelling and simulation in application areas.
Paper submission is solicited on:
• theoretical aspects of modelling and simulation including formal modelling, model-checking, random number generators, sensitivity analysis, variance reduction techniques, experimental design, meta-modelling, methods and algorithms for validation and verification, selection and comparison procedures etc.;
• methodology and application of modelling and simulation in any area, including computer systems, networks, real-time and embedded systems, mobile and intelligent agents, manufacturing and transportation systems, management, engineering, biomedical engineering, economics, ecology and environment, education, transaction handling, etc.;
• simulation languages and environments including those, specific to distributed computing, grid computing, high performance computers or computer networks, etc.;
• distributed and real-time simulation, simulation interoperability;
• tools for high performance computing simulation, including dedicated architectures and parallel computing.